2024-01-13 10:02:43

by Greg KH

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 6.1 0/4] 6.1.73-rc1 review

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.73 release.
There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.73-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Linux 6.1.73-rc1

Jon Maxwell <[email protected]>
ipv6: remove max_size check inline with ipv4

Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Revert "nfsd: separate nfsd_last_thread() from nfsd_put()"

Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Revert "nfsd: call nfsd_last_thread() before final nfsd_put()"

Steve French <[email protected]>
cifs: fix flushing folio regression for 6.1 backport


-------------

Diffstat:

Makefile | 4 ++--
fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c | 9 ++-------
fs/nfsd/nfsd.h | 8 +-------
fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
fs/smb/client/cifsfs.c | 2 +-
include/net/dst_ops.h | 2 +-
net/core/dst.c | 8 ++------
net/ipv6/route.c | 13 +++++--------
8 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)




2024-01-13 18:44:03

by SeongJae Park

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/4] 6.1.73-rc1 review

Hello,

On Sat, 13 Jan 2024 10:50:38 +0100 Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> wrote:

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.73 release.
> There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.73-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.

This rc kernel passes DAMON functionality test[1] on my test machine.
Attaching the test results summary below. Please note that I retrieved the
kernel from linux-stable-rc tree[2].

Tested-by: SeongJae Park <[email protected]>

[1] https://github.com/awslabs/damon-tests/tree/next/corr
[2] ccaabe946278 ("Linux 6.1.73-rc1")

Thanks,
SJ

[...]

---

ok 1 selftests: damon: debugfs_attrs.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon: debugfs_schemes.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon: debugfs_target_ids.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon: debugfs_empty_targets.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon: debugfs_huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon: debugfs_duplicate_context_creation.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon: sysfs.sh
ok 1 selftests: damon-tests: kunit.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon-tests: huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon-tests: buffer_overflow.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon-tests: rm_contexts.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon-tests: record_null_deref.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_read_before_terminate_race.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_pid_leak.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon-tests: damo_tests.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon-tests: masim-record.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon-tests: build_arm64.sh
ok 12 selftests: damon-tests: build_m68k.sh
ok 13 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_idle_flag.sh
ok 14 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_highpte.sh
ok 15 selftests: damon-tests: build_nomemcg.sh
[33m
[92mPASS [39m

2024-01-14 10:34:59

by Pavel Machek

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/4] 6.1.73-rc1 review

Hi!

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.73 release.
> There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

CIP testing did not find any problems here:

https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-6.1.y

Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <[email protected]>

Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany


Attachments:
(No filename) (657.00 B)
signature.asc (201.00 B)
Download all attachments

2024-01-14 19:38:28

by Ron Economos

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/4] 6.1.73-rc1 review

On 1/13/24 1:50 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.73 release.
> There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.73-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).

Tested-by: Ron Economos <[email protected]>


2024-01-15 08:50:30

by Naresh Kamboju

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/4] 6.1.73-rc1 review

On Sat, 13 Jan 2024 at 15:32, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.73 release.
> There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.73-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <[email protected]>

## Build
* kernel: 6.1.73-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-6.1.y
* git commit: ccaabe94627897d3e2d2234aa6b2196c32a63325
* git describe: v6.1.72-5-gccaabe946278
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.72-5-gccaabe946278/

## Test Regressions (compared to v6.1.71)

## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.1.71)

## Test Fixes (compared to v6.1.71)

## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.1.71)

## Test result summary
total: 253149, pass: 214510, fail: 4787, skip: 33543, xfail: 309

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 151 total, 150 passed, 1 failed
* arm64: 52 total, 52 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 39 total, 39 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 15 total, 14 passed, 1 failed
* s390: 16 total, 16 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 46 total, 46 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* libgpiod
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

2024-01-15 10:24:53

by Jon Hunter

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/4] 6.1.73-rc1 review

On Sat, 13 Jan 2024 10:50:38 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.73 release.
> There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.73-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

All tests passing for Tegra ...

Test results for stable-v6.1:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
116 tests: 116 pass, 0 fail

Linux version: 6.1.73-rc1-gccaabe946278
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04

Tested-by: Jon Hunter <[email protected]>

Jon

2024-01-15 12:21:13

by Conor Dooley

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/4] 6.1.73-rc1 review

On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 10:50:38AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.73 release.
> There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

It may be too late, but
Tested-by: Conor Dooley <[email protected]>

Cheers,
Conor.


Attachments:
(No filename) (528.00 B)
signature.asc (235.00 B)
Download all attachments

2024-01-15 19:10:21

by Florian Fainelli

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/4] 6.1.73-rc1 review



On 1/13/2024 1:50 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.73 release.
> There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.73-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
--
Florian

2024-01-15 19:47:06

by Allen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/4] 6.1.73-rc1 review

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.73 release.
> There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.73-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

Compiled and booted on my x86_64 and ARM64 test systems. No errors or
regressions.

Tested-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>

Thanks.