2024-02-14 17:01:16

by Oscar Salvador

Subject: [PATCH v9 1/7] lib/stackdepot: Fix first entry having a 0-handle

The very first entry of stack_record gets a handle of 0, but this is wrong
because stackdepot treats a 0-handle as a non-valid one.
E.g: See the check in stack_depot_fetch()

Fix this by adding and offset of 1.

This bug has been lurking since the very beginning of stackdepot,
but no one really cared as it seems.
Because of that I am not adding a Fixes tag.

Co-developed-by: Marco Elver <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <[email protected]>
---
lib/stackdepot.c | 16 +++++++++-------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/stackdepot.c b/lib/stackdepot.c
index 4a7055a63d9f..c043a4186bc5 100644
--- a/lib/stackdepot.c
+++ b/lib/stackdepot.c
@@ -45,15 +45,16 @@
#define DEPOT_POOL_INDEX_BITS (DEPOT_HANDLE_BITS - DEPOT_OFFSET_BITS - \
STACK_DEPOT_EXTRA_BITS)
#define DEPOT_POOLS_CAP 8192
+/* The pool_index is offset by 1 so the first record does not have a 0 handle. */
#define DEPOT_MAX_POOLS \
- (((1LL << (DEPOT_POOL_INDEX_BITS)) < DEPOT_POOLS_CAP) ? \
- (1LL << (DEPOT_POOL_INDEX_BITS)) : DEPOT_POOLS_CAP)
+ (((1LL << (DEPOT_POOL_INDEX_BITS)) - 1 < DEPOT_POOLS_CAP) ? \
+ (1LL << (DEPOT_POOL_INDEX_BITS)) - 1 : DEPOT_POOLS_CAP)

/* Compact structure that stores a reference to a stack. */
union handle_parts {
depot_stack_handle_t handle;
struct {
- u32 pool_index : DEPOT_POOL_INDEX_BITS;
+ u32 pool_index : DEPOT_POOL_INDEX_BITS; /* pool_index is offset by 1 */
u32 offset : DEPOT_OFFSET_BITS;
u32 extra : STACK_DEPOT_EXTRA_BITS;
};
@@ -372,7 +373,7 @@ static struct stack_record *depot_pop_free_pool(void **prealloc, size_t size)
stack = current_pool + pool_offset;

/* Pre-initialize handle once. */
- stack->handle.pool_index = pool_index;
+ stack->handle.pool_index = pool_index + 1;
stack->handle.offset = pool_offset >> DEPOT_STACK_ALIGN;
stack->handle.extra = 0;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&stack->hash_list);
@@ -483,18 +484,19 @@ static struct stack_record *depot_fetch_stack(depot_stack_handle_t handle)
const int pools_num_cached = READ_ONCE(pools_num);
union handle_parts parts = { .handle = handle };
void *pool;
+ u32 pool_index = parts.pool_index - 1;
size_t offset = parts.offset << DEPOT_STACK_ALIGN;
struct stack_record *stack;

lockdep_assert_not_held(&pool_lock);

- if (parts.pool_index > pools_num_cached) {
+ if (pool_index > pools_num_cached) {
WARN(1, "pool index %d out of bounds (%d) for stack id %08x\n",
- parts.pool_index, pools_num_cached, handle);
+ pool_index, pools_num_cached, handle);
return NULL;
}

- pool = stack_pools[parts.pool_index];
+ pool = stack_pools[pool_index];
if (WARN_ON(!pool))
return NULL;

--
2.43.0

2024-02-15 11:03:11

by Vlastimil Babka

Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/7] lib/stackdepot: Fix first entry having a 0-handle

On 2/14/24 18:01, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> The very first entry of stack_record gets a handle of 0, but this is wrong
> because stackdepot treats a 0-handle as a non-valid one.
> E.g: See the check in stack_depot_fetch()
>
> Fix this by adding and offset of 1.
>
> This bug has been lurking since the very beginning of stackdepot,
> but no one really cared as it seems.
> Because of that I am not adding a Fixes tag.
>
> Co-developed-by: Marco Elver <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>