2024-03-04 21:42:53

by Kees Cook

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v3] sock: Use unsafe_memcpy() for sock_copy()

While testing for places where zero-sized destinations were still showing
up in the kernel, sock_copy() and inet_reqsk_clone() were found, which
are using very specific memcpy() offsets for both avoiding a portion of
struct sock, and copying beyond the end of it (since struct sock is really
just a common header before the protocol-specific allocation). Instead
of trying to unravel this historical lack of container_of(), just switch
to unsafe_memcpy(), since that's effectively what was happening already
(memcpy() wasn't checking 0-sized destinations while the code base was
being converted away from fake flexible arrays).

Avoid the following false positive warning with future changes to
CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE:

memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 3068) of destination "&nsk->__sk_common.skc_dontcopy_end" at net/core/sock.c:2057 (size 0)

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
---
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
v3: fix inet_reqsk_clone() comment
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
---
net/core/sock.c | 5 +++--
net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 5 +++--
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 0a7f46c37f0c..b7ea358eb18f 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -2053,8 +2053,9 @@ static void sock_copy(struct sock *nsk, const struct sock *osk)

memcpy(nsk, osk, offsetof(struct sock, sk_dontcopy_begin));

- memcpy(&nsk->sk_dontcopy_end, &osk->sk_dontcopy_end,
- prot->obj_size - offsetof(struct sock, sk_dontcopy_end));
+ unsafe_memcpy(&nsk->sk_dontcopy_end, &osk->sk_dontcopy_end,
+ prot->obj_size - offsetof(struct sock, sk_dontcopy_end),
+ /* alloc is larger than struct, see sk_prot_alloc() */);

#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK
nsk->sk_security = sptr;
diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
index 459af1f89739..6a14a44aa161 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
@@ -906,8 +906,9 @@ static struct request_sock *inet_reqsk_clone(struct request_sock *req,

memcpy(nreq_sk, req_sk,
offsetof(struct sock, sk_dontcopy_begin));
- memcpy(&nreq_sk->sk_dontcopy_end, &req_sk->sk_dontcopy_end,
- req->rsk_ops->obj_size - offsetof(struct sock, sk_dontcopy_end));
+ unsafe_memcpy(&nreq_sk->sk_dontcopy_end, &req_sk->sk_dontcopy_end,
+ req->rsk_ops->obj_size - offsetof(struct sock, sk_dontcopy_end),
+ /* alloc is larger than struct, see above */);

sk_node_init(&nreq_sk->sk_node);
nreq_sk->sk_tx_queue_mapping = req_sk->sk_tx_queue_mapping;
--
2.34.1



2024-03-05 13:23:57

by Simon Horman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sock: Use unsafe_memcpy() for sock_copy()

On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 01:29:31PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> While testing for places where zero-sized destinations were still showing
> up in the kernel, sock_copy() and inet_reqsk_clone() were found, which
> are using very specific memcpy() offsets for both avoiding a portion of
> struct sock, and copying beyond the end of it (since struct sock is really
> just a common header before the protocol-specific allocation). Instead
> of trying to unravel this historical lack of container_of(), just switch
> to unsafe_memcpy(), since that's effectively what was happening already
> (memcpy() wasn't checking 0-sized destinations while the code base was
> being converted away from fake flexible arrays).
>
> Avoid the following false positive warning with future changes to
> CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE:
>
> memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 3068) of destination "&nsk->__sk_common.skc_dontcopy_end" at net/core/sock.c:2057 (size 0)
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
> ---
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
> Cc: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> v3: fix inet_reqsk_clone() comment
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>

2024-03-06 03:10:58

by patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sock: Use unsafe_memcpy() for sock_copy()

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>:

On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 13:29:31 -0800 you wrote:
> While testing for places where zero-sized destinations were still showing
> up in the kernel, sock_copy() and inet_reqsk_clone() were found, which
> are using very specific memcpy() offsets for both avoiding a portion of
> struct sock, and copying beyond the end of it (since struct sock is really
> just a common header before the protocol-specific allocation). Instead
> of trying to unravel this historical lack of container_of(), just switch
> to unsafe_memcpy(), since that's effectively what was happening already
> (memcpy() wasn't checking 0-sized destinations while the code base was
> being converted away from fake flexible arrays).
>
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
- [v3] sock: Use unsafe_memcpy() for sock_copy()
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/ff73f8344e58

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html