The kerneldoc for struct cs_dsp refers to a fw_file_name member but
there's no such member.
Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <[email protected]>
---
include/linux/firmware/cirrus/cs_dsp.h | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/firmware/cirrus/cs_dsp.h b/include/linux/firmware/cirrus/cs_dsp.h
index 29cd11d5a3cf..23384a54d575 100644
--- a/include/linux/firmware/cirrus/cs_dsp.h
+++ b/include/linux/firmware/cirrus/cs_dsp.h
@@ -123,7 +123,6 @@ struct cs_dsp_client_ops;
* @sysclk_mask: Mask of frequency bits within sysclk register (ADSP1 only)
* @sysclk_shift: Shift of frequency bits within sysclk register (ADSP1 only)
* @alg_regions: List of currently loaded algorithm regions
- * @fw_file_name: Filename of the current firmware
* @fw_name: Name of the current firmware
* @fw_id: ID of the current firmware, obtained from the wmfw
* @fw_id_version: Version of the firmware, obtained from the wmfw
--
2.30.2
On Thu, 07 Mar 2024 10:55:16 +0000, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> The kerneldoc for struct cs_dsp refers to a fw_file_name member but
> there's no such member.
>
>
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] firmware: cirrus: cs_dsp: Remove non-existent member from kerneldoc
commit: 5d51a794414359dd387c3da7a2ea7602c67f84a6
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark