Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in:
include/linux/sched.h
between commit:
d9233ee073c9 ("mm: document memalloc_noreclaim_save() and memalloc_pin_save()")
from the mm-unstable branch of the mm tree and commit:
06b23f92af87 ("block: update cached timestamp post schedule/preemption")
from the block tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc include/linux/sched.h
index 5b27a548d863,15b7cb478d16..000000000000
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@@ -1642,9 -1641,8 +1642,9 @@@ extern struct pid *cad_pid
#define PF__HOLE__02000000 0x02000000
#define PF_NO_SETAFFINITY 0x04000000 /* Userland is not allowed to meddle with cpus_mask */
#define PF_MCE_EARLY 0x08000000 /* Early kill for mce process policy */
-#define PF_MEMALLOC_PIN 0x10000000 /* Allocation context constrained to zones which allow long term pinning. */
+#define PF_MEMALLOC_PIN 0x10000000 /* Allocations constrained to zones which allow long term pinning.
+ * See memalloc_pin_save() */
- #define PF__HOLE__20000000 0x20000000
+ #define PF_BLOCK_TS 0x20000000 /* plug has ts that needs updating */
#define PF__HOLE__40000000 0x40000000
#define PF_SUSPEND_TASK 0x80000000 /* This thread called freeze_processes() and should not be frozen */
Hi all,
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 11:25:19 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in:
>
> include/linux/sched.h
>
> between commit:
>
> d9233ee073c9 ("mm: document memalloc_noreclaim_save() and memalloc_pin_save()")
>
> from the mm-unstable branch of the mm tree and commit:
>
> 06b23f92af87 ("block: update cached timestamp post schedule/preemption")
>
> from the block tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc include/linux/sched.h
> index 5b27a548d863,15b7cb478d16..000000000000
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@@ -1642,9 -1641,8 +1642,9 @@@ extern struct pid *cad_pid
> #define PF__HOLE__02000000 0x02000000
> #define PF_NO_SETAFFINITY 0x04000000 /* Userland is not allowed to meddle with cpus_mask */
> #define PF_MCE_EARLY 0x08000000 /* Early kill for mce process policy */
> -#define PF_MEMALLOC_PIN 0x10000000 /* Allocation context constrained to zones which allow long term pinning. */
> +#define PF_MEMALLOC_PIN 0x10000000 /* Allocations constrained to zones which allow long term pinning.
> + * See memalloc_pin_save() */
> - #define PF__HOLE__20000000 0x20000000
> + #define PF_BLOCK_TS 0x20000000 /* plug has ts that needs updating */
> #define PF__HOLE__40000000 0x40000000
> #define PF_SUSPEND_TASK 0x80000000 /* This thread called freeze_processes() and should not be frozen */
>
This is now a conflict between the mm-stable tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell