2024-03-19 00:51:07

by Waiman Long

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] locking/qspinlock: Always evaluate lockevent* non-event parameter once

The inc parameter of lockevent_add() and the cond parameter of
lockevent_cond_inc() are only evaluated when CONFIG_LOCK_EVENT_COUNTS
is on. That can cause problem if those parameters are expressions
with side effect like a "++". Fix this by evaluating those non-event
parameters once even if CONFIG_LOCK_EVENT_COUNTS is off. This will also
eliminate the need of the __maybe_unused attribute to the wait_early
local variable in pv_wait_node().

Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <[email protected]>
---
kernel/locking/lock_events.h | 4 ++--
kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lock_events.h b/kernel/locking/lock_events.h
index a6016b91803d..d2345e9c0190 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lock_events.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/lock_events.h
@@ -53,8 +53,8 @@ static inline void __lockevent_add(enum lock_events event, int inc)
#else /* CONFIG_LOCK_EVENT_COUNTS */

#define lockevent_inc(ev)
-#define lockevent_add(ev, c)
-#define lockevent_cond_inc(ev, c)
+#define lockevent_add(ev, c) do { (void)(c); } while (0)
+#define lockevent_cond_inc(ev, c) do { (void)(c); } while (0)

#endif /* CONFIG_LOCK_EVENT_COUNTS */

diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
index ae2b12f68b90..169950fe1aad 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static void pv_wait_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node, struct mcs_spinlock *prev)
{
struct pv_node *pn = (struct pv_node *)node;
struct pv_node *pp = (struct pv_node *)prev;
- bool __maybe_unused wait_early;
+ bool wait_early;
int loop;

for (;;) {
--
2.39.3



2024-03-19 04:41:46

by Boqun Feng

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/qspinlock: Always evaluate lockevent* non-event parameter once

On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 08:50:04PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> The inc parameter of lockevent_add() and the cond parameter of
> lockevent_cond_inc() are only evaluated when CONFIG_LOCK_EVENT_COUNTS
> is on. That can cause problem if those parameters are expressions
> with side effect like a "++". Fix this by evaluating those non-event
> parameters once even if CONFIG_LOCK_EVENT_COUNTS is off. This will also
> eliminate the need of the __maybe_unused attribute to the wait_early
> local variable in pv_wait_node().
>
> Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <[email protected]>

Regards,
Boqun

> ---
> kernel/locking/lock_events.h | 4 ++--
> kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/lock_events.h b/kernel/locking/lock_events.h
> index a6016b91803d..d2345e9c0190 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/lock_events.h
> +++ b/kernel/locking/lock_events.h
> @@ -53,8 +53,8 @@ static inline void __lockevent_add(enum lock_events event, int inc)
> #else /* CONFIG_LOCK_EVENT_COUNTS */
>
> #define lockevent_inc(ev)
> -#define lockevent_add(ev, c)
> -#define lockevent_cond_inc(ev, c)
> +#define lockevent_add(ev, c) do { (void)(c); } while (0)
> +#define lockevent_cond_inc(ev, c) do { (void)(c); } while (0)
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_LOCK_EVENT_COUNTS */
>
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
> index ae2b12f68b90..169950fe1aad 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
> +++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
> @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static void pv_wait_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node, struct mcs_spinlock *prev)
> {
> struct pv_node *pn = (struct pv_node *)node;
> struct pv_node *pp = (struct pv_node *)prev;
> - bool __maybe_unused wait_early;
> + bool wait_early;
> int loop;
>
> for (;;) {
> --
> 2.39.3
>

Subject: [tip: locking/core] locking/qspinlock: Always evaluate lockevent* non-event parameter once

The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID: 3774b28d8f3b9e8a946beb9550bee85e5454fc9f
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/3774b28d8f3b9e8a946beb9550bee85e5454fc9f
Author: Waiman Long <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 20:50:04 -04:00
Committer: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
CommitterDate: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 20:45:17 +01:00

locking/qspinlock: Always evaluate lockevent* non-event parameter once

The 'inc' parameter of lockevent_add() and the cond parameter of
lockevent_cond_inc() are only evaluated when CONFIG_LOCK_EVENT_COUNTS
is on. That can cause problem if those parameters are expressions
with side effect like a "++". Fix this by evaluating those non-event
parameters once even if CONFIG_LOCK_EVENT_COUNTS is off. This will also
eliminate the need of the __maybe_unused attribute to the wait_early
local variable in pv_wait_node().

Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
---
kernel/locking/lock_events.h | 4 ++--
kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lock_events.h b/kernel/locking/lock_events.h
index a6016b9..d2345e9 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lock_events.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/lock_events.h
@@ -53,8 +53,8 @@ static inline void __lockevent_add(enum lock_events event, int inc)
#else /* CONFIG_LOCK_EVENT_COUNTS */

#define lockevent_inc(ev)
-#define lockevent_add(ev, c)
-#define lockevent_cond_inc(ev, c)
+#define lockevent_add(ev, c) do { (void)(c); } while (0)
+#define lockevent_cond_inc(ev, c) do { (void)(c); } while (0)

#endif /* CONFIG_LOCK_EVENT_COUNTS */

diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
index ae2b12f..169950f 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static void pv_wait_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node, struct mcs_spinlock *prev)
{
struct pv_node *pn = (struct pv_node *)node;
struct pv_node *pp = (struct pv_node *)prev;
- bool __maybe_unused wait_early;
+ bool wait_early;
int loop;

for (;;) {