It seems obvious once you know, but at first I didn't realise that the
suite name is part of this format. Document it and add some examples.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <[email protected]>
---
v1->v2: Expanded to clarify that suite_glob and test_glob are two separate
patterns. Also made some other trivial changes to formatting etc.
Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst | 33 +++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst
index 19ddf5e07013..b07252d3fa9d 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst
@@ -156,12 +156,39 @@ Filtering tests
===============
By passing a bash style glob filter to the ``exec`` or ``run``
-commands, we can run a subset of the tests built into a kernel . For
-example: if we only want to run KUnit resource tests, use:
+commands, we can run a subset of the tests built into a kernel,
+identified by a string like ``<suite_glob>[.<test_glob>]``.
+
+For example, to run the ``kunit-resource-test`` suite:
+
+.. code-block::
+
+ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run kunit-resource-test
+
+To run a specific test from that suite:
+
+.. code-block::
+
+ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run kunit-resource-test.kunit_resource_test
+
+To run all tests from suites whose names start with ``kunit``:
+
+.. code-block::
+
+ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run 'kunit*'
+
+To run all tests whose name ends with ``remove_resource``:
+
+.. code-block::
+
+ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run '*.*remove_resource'
+
+To run all tests whose name ends with ``remove_resource``, from suites whose
+names start with ``kunit``:
.. code-block::
- ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run 'kunit-resource*'
+ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run 'kunit*.*remove_resource'
This uses the standard glob format with wildcard characters.
--
2.44.0.478.gd926399ef9-goog
On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 5:51 AM Brendan Jackman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> It seems obvious once you know, but at first I didn't realise that the
> suite name is part of this format. Document it and add some examples.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <[email protected]>
Thanks!
I agree with your comment on v1, I think the extra verbosity is fine.
It's still easy to read and this should hopefully eliminate the
ambiguity for most readers.
> ---
> v1->v2: Expanded to clarify that suite_glob and test_glob are two separate
> patterns. Also made some other trivial changes to formatting etc.
<snip>