From: Fenglin Wu <[email protected]>
The output voltage is inclusive hence the max level calculation is
off-by-one-step. Correct it.
Fixes: 11205bb63e5c ("Input: add support for pm8xxx based vibrator driver")
Signed-off-by: Fenglin Wu <[email protected]>
---
drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c b/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c
index 04cb87efd799..844ca7e1f59f 100644
--- a/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c
+++ b/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c
@@ -14,7 +14,8 @@
#define VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV (3100)
#define VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV (1200)
-#define VIB_MAX_LEVELS (VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV - VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV)
+#define VIB_PER_STEP_mV (100)
+#define VIB_MAX_LEVELS (VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV - VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV + VIB_PER_STEP_mV)
#define MAX_FF_SPEED 0xff
@@ -118,10 +119,10 @@ static void pm8xxx_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
vib->active = true;
vib->level = ((VIB_MAX_LEVELS * vib->speed) / MAX_FF_SPEED) +
VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV;
- vib->level /= 100;
+ vib->level /= VIB_PER_STEP_mV;
} else {
vib->active = false;
- vib->level = VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV / 100;
+ vib->level = VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV / VIB_PER_STEP_mV;
}
pm8xxx_vib_set(vib, vib->active);
--
2.25.1
On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 at 15:36, Fenglin Wu via B4 Relay
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Fenglin Wu <[email protected]>
>
> The output voltage is inclusive hence the max level calculation is
> off-by-one-step. Correct it.
.. while we are at it also add a define for the step size instead of
using the magic value.
With that in place:
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <[email protected]>
>
> Fixes: 11205bb63e5c ("Input: add support for pm8xxx based vibrator driver")
> Signed-off-by: Fenglin Wu <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c b/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c
> index 04cb87efd799..844ca7e1f59f 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c
> @@ -14,7 +14,8 @@
>
> #define VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV (3100)
> #define VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV (1200)
> -#define VIB_MAX_LEVELS (VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV - VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV)
> +#define VIB_PER_STEP_mV (100)
> +#define VIB_MAX_LEVELS (VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV - VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV + VIB_PER_STEP_mV)
>
> #define MAX_FF_SPEED 0xff
>
> @@ -118,10 +119,10 @@ static void pm8xxx_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> vib->active = true;
> vib->level = ((VIB_MAX_LEVELS * vib->speed) / MAX_FF_SPEED) +
> VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV;
> - vib->level /= 100;
> + vib->level /= VIB_PER_STEP_mV;
> } else {
> vib->active = false;
> - vib->level = VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV / 100;
> + vib->level = VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV / VIB_PER_STEP_mV;
> }
>
> pm8xxx_vib_set(vib, vib->active);
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 07:21:16PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 at 15:36, Fenglin Wu via B4 Relay
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > From: Fenglin Wu <[email protected]>
> >
> > The output voltage is inclusive hence the max level calculation is
> > off-by-one-step. Correct it.
>
> ... while we are at it also add a define for the step size instead of
> using the magic value.
I adjusted the patch description as Dmitry suggested, and applied this
patch. Please address Konrad's feedback on the other 2 and I will apply
the rest.
Thank you.
--
Dmitry