On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 04:49:18PM +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> 2024-04-29, 14:33:15 +0200, Joel Granados wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 10:53:47AM +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> > > 2024-04-26, 12:46:53 +0200, Joel Granados via B4 Relay wrote:
...
> > > > {
> > > > + size_t table_size = ARRAY_SIZE(mpls_table);
> > >
> > > This table still has a {} as its final element. It should be gone too?
> > Now, how did that get away? I'll run my coccinelle scripts once more to
> > make sure that I don't have more of these hiding in the shadows.
>
> I didn't spot any other with a dumb
>
> sed -n '<line>,^};/p' <file>
I used a coccinelle script:
* ran it with `make coccicheck MODE=patch SPFLAGS="--in-place --debug" COCCI=script.cocci`
* script:
```
virtual patch
@r1@
identifier ctl_table_name;
@@
static struct ctl_table ctl_table_name[] = {
...
-, {}
};
```
and a gawk script
* ran it with `for f in $(git grep -l "struct ctl_table") ; do script $f ; done`
* script:
```
#!/usr/bin/gawk -f
BEGINFILE {
RS=","
has_struct = 0
}
/(static )?(const )?struct ctl_table/ {
has_struct = 1
}
has_struct && /^(\n)?[\t ]*{(\n)*[\t ]*}/ {
print "Filename : " FILENAME ", Record Number : " FNR
}
```
At this point the coccinelle script gives me too many false positives
but the gawk is spot on. Thx for the sed one. Will make a note of it.
Best
--
Joel Granados