Subject: [PATCH v2] module: create weak dependecies

It has been seen that for some network mac drivers (i.e. lan78xx) the
related module for the phy is loaded dynamically depending on the current
hardware. In this case, the associated phy is read using mdio bus and then
the associated phy module is loaded during runtime (kernel function
phy_request_driver_module). However, no software dependency is defined, so
the user tools will no be able to get this dependency. For example, if
dracut is used and the hardware is present, lan78xx will be included but no
phy module will be added, and in the next restart the device will not work
from boot because no related phy will be found during initramfs stage.

In order to solve this, we could define a normal 'pre' software dependency
in lan78xx module with all the possible phy modules (there may be some),
but proceeding in that way, all the possible phy modules would be loaded
while only one is necessary.

The idea is to create a new type of dependency, that we are going to call
'weak' to be used only by the user tools that need to detect this situation.
In that way, for example, dracut could check the 'weak' dependency of the
modules involved in order to install these dependencies in initramfs too.
That is, for the commented lan78xx module, defining the 'weak' dependency
with the possible phy modules list, only the necessary phy would be loaded
on demand keeping the same behavior, but all the possible phy modules would
be available from initramfs.

The 'weak' dependency support has been included in kmod:
https://github.com/kmod-project/kmod/commit/05828b4a6e9327a63ef94df544a042b5e9ce4fe7

Signed-off-by: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez <[email protected]>
---
V1 -> V2:
- Include reference to 'weak' dependency support in kmod.

include/linux/module.h | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h
index 1153b0d99a80..231e710d8736 100644
--- a/include/linux/module.h
+++ b/include/linux/module.h
@@ -173,6 +173,11 @@ extern void cleanup_module(void);
*/
#define MODULE_SOFTDEP(_softdep) MODULE_INFO(softdep, _softdep)

+/* Weak module dependencies. See man modprobe.d for details.
+ * Example: MODULE_WEAKDEP("module-foo")
+ */
+#define MODULE_WEAKDEP(_weakdep) MODULE_INFO(weakdep, _weakdep)
+
/*
* MODULE_FILE is used for generating modules.builtin
* So, make it no-op when this is being built as a module
--
2.44.0



2024-05-09 13:06:55

by Lucas De Marchi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] module: create weak dependecies

On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 12:24:40PM GMT, Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez wrote:
>It has been seen that for some network mac drivers (i.e. lan78xx) the
>related module for the phy is loaded dynamically depending on the current
>hardware. In this case, the associated phy is read using mdio bus and then
>the associated phy module is loaded during runtime (kernel function
>phy_request_driver_module). However, no software dependency is defined, so
>the user tools will no be able to get this dependency. For example, if
>dracut is used and the hardware is present, lan78xx will be included but no
>phy module will be added, and in the next restart the device will not work
>from boot because no related phy will be found during initramfs stage.
>
>In order to solve this, we could define a normal 'pre' software dependency
>in lan78xx module with all the possible phy modules (there may be some),
>but proceeding in that way, all the possible phy modules would be loaded
>while only one is necessary.
>
>The idea is to create a new type of dependency, that we are going to call
>'weak' to be used only by the user tools that need to detect this situation.
>In that way, for example, dracut could check the 'weak' dependency of the
>modules involved in order to install these dependencies in initramfs too.
>That is, for the commented lan78xx module, defining the 'weak' dependency
>with the possible phy modules list, only the necessary phy would be loaded
>on demand keeping the same behavior, but all the possible phy modules would
>be available from initramfs.

I think it's important a note about backward compatibility. If a system
doesn't have a new-enough depmod, it will basically not create the new
weadep file and initrd generators won't be able to use that. Only
downside is not being able to use the new feature, but it should still
work as previously.

>
>The 'weak' dependency support has been included in kmod:
>https://github.com/kmod-project/kmod/commit/05828b4a6e9327a63ef94df544a042b5e9ce4fe7
>
>Signed-off-by: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez <[email protected]>
>---
>V1 -> V2:
>- Include reference to 'weak' dependency support in kmod.
>
> include/linux/module.h | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h
>index 1153b0d99a80..231e710d8736 100644
>--- a/include/linux/module.h
>+++ b/include/linux/module.h
>@@ -173,6 +173,11 @@ extern void cleanup_module(void);
> */
> #define MODULE_SOFTDEP(_softdep) MODULE_INFO(softdep, _softdep)
>
>+/* Weak module dependencies. See man modprobe.d for details.

Documentation/process/coding-style.rst section 8 says to balance the /*
and */, but up to Luis what he enforces in the module tree.

Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <[email protected]>

Lucas De Marchi

>+ * Example: MODULE_WEAKDEP("module-foo")
>+ */
>+#define MODULE_WEAKDEP(_weakdep) MODULE_INFO(weakdep, _weakdep)
>+
> /*
> * MODULE_FILE is used for generating modules.builtin
> * So, make it no-op when this is being built as a module
>--
>2.44.0
>

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] module: create weak dependecies

> I think it's important a note about backward compatibility. If a system
> doesn't have a new-enough depmod, it will basically not create the new
> weadep file and initrd generators won't be able to use that. Only
> downside is not being able to use the new feature, but it should still
> work as previously.
Ok, good, idea, I will send a new version of the patch with the note.

Documentation/process/coding-style.rst section 8 says to balance the /*
and */, but up to Luis what he enforces in the module tree.
Ok, I will fix that too.

Thanks

Best regards
José Ignacio