Dear RT Folks,
This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 4.19.312-rt134-rc3.
Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches
too.
The -rc release is also available on kernel.org
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-stable-rt.git
on the v4.19-rt-next branch.
If all goes well, this patch will be converted to the next main
release on 2024-05-14.
Signing key fingerprint:
5BF6 7BC5 0826 72CA BB45 ACAE 587C 5ECA 5D0A 306C
All keys used for the above files and repositories can be found on the
following git repository:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/docs/kernel/pgpkeys.git
Enjoy!
Daniel
Changes from v4.19.307-rt133:
Daniel Wagner (1):
Linux 4.19.312-rt134
localversion-rt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
2.44.0
v4.19.312-rt134-rc3 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
-----------
Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <[email protected]>
---
localversion-rt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/localversion-rt b/localversion-rt
index c2c7e0fb6685..6067da4c8c99 100644
--- a/localversion-rt
+++ b/localversion-rt
@@ -1 +1 @@
--rt133
+-rt134
--
2.44.0
On 2024-05-07 17:16:47 [+0200], Daniel Wagner wrote:
> Dear RT Folks,
>
> This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 4.19.312-rt134-rc3.
>
> Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches
> too.
>
> The -rc release is also available on kernel.org
I do have to complain a bit. The whole diff contains only a diff against
localversion while the content of interest not here. But but I guess it
is what we talked about so... but for everyone else it looks like
version increment.
Sebastian
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 08:59:35AM GMT, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2024-05-07 17:16:47 [+0200], Daniel Wagner wrote:
> > Dear RT Folks,
> >
> > This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 4.19.312-rt134-rc3.
> >
> > Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches
> > too.
> >
> > The -rc release is also available on kernel.org
>
> I do have to complain a bit. The whole diff contains only a diff against
> localversion while the content of interest not here. But but I guess it
> is what we talked about so... but for everyone else it looks like
> version increment.
Sure, the merge diff should also be included. This feature missing in
the tooling. I'll add it, so next time it should also contain also the
merge diff.