From: Davide Caratti <[email protected]>
We used to call it 'master' socket at the early stages of MPTCP
development, but the correct wording is 'MPTCP' socket opposed to 'TCP
subflows': convert the last 3 comments to use a more appropriate term.
Signed-off-by: Davide Caratti <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <[email protected]>
---
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 4 ++--
net/mptcp/subflow.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 7ce11bee3b79..ead0bf63cf95 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -2202,7 +2202,7 @@ static int mptcp_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
if (skb_queue_empty(&msk->receive_queue) && __mptcp_move_skbs(msk))
continue;
- /* only the master socket status is relevant here. The exit
+ /* only the MPTCP socket status is relevant here. The exit
* conditions mirror closely tcp_recvmsg()
*/
if (copied >= target)
@@ -3521,7 +3521,7 @@ void mptcp_subflow_process_delegated(struct sock *ssk, long status)
static int mptcp_hash(struct sock *sk)
{
/* should never be called,
- * we hash the TCP subflows not the master socket
+ * we hash the TCP subflows not the MPTCP socket
*/
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
return 0;
diff --git a/net/mptcp/subflow.c b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
index 612c38570a64..39e2cbdf3801 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
@@ -1719,7 +1719,7 @@ int mptcp_subflow_create_socket(struct sock *sk, unsigned short family,
mptcp_sockopt_sync_locked(mptcp_sk(sk), sf->sk);
release_sock(sf->sk);
- /* the newly created socket really belongs to the owning MPTCP master
+ /* the newly created socket really belongs to the owning MPTCP
* socket, even if for additional subflows the allocation is performed
* by a kernel workqueue. Adjust inode references, so that the
* procfs/diag interfaces really show this one belonging to the correct
--
2.43.0