In the liointc hardware, there are different ISRs for different cores.
We always use core#0's ISR before but has no problem, it is because the
interrupts are routed to core#0 by default. If we change the routing,
we should set correct ISRs for different cores.
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tianli Xiong <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <[email protected]>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-liointc.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-liointc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-liointc.c
index e4b33aed1c97..7c4fe7ab4b83 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-liointc.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-liointc.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
#define LIOINTC_INTC_CHIP_START 0x20
-#define LIOINTC_REG_INTC_STATUS (LIOINTC_INTC_CHIP_START + 0x20)
+#define LIOINTC_REG_INTC_STATUS(core) (LIOINTC_INTC_CHIP_START + 0x20 + (core) * 8)
#define LIOINTC_REG_INTC_EN_STATUS (LIOINTC_INTC_CHIP_START + 0x04)
#define LIOINTC_REG_INTC_ENABLE (LIOINTC_INTC_CHIP_START + 0x08)
#define LIOINTC_REG_INTC_DISABLE (LIOINTC_INTC_CHIP_START + 0x0c)
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ static int liointc_init(phys_addr_t addr, unsigned long size, int revision,
goto out_free_priv;
for (i = 0; i < LIOINTC_NUM_CORES; i++)
- priv->core_isr[i] = base + LIOINTC_REG_INTC_STATUS;
+ priv->core_isr[i] = base + LIOINTC_REG_INTC_STATUS(i);
for (i = 0; i < LIOINTC_NUM_PARENT; i++)
priv->handler[i].parent_int_map = parent_int_map[i];
--
2.43.0