2024-06-16 08:07:13

by Krzysztof Kozlowski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mfd: Explain lack of child dependency in simple-mfd

Common mistake of usage of 'simple-mfd' compatible is a dependency of
children on resources acquired and managed by the parent, e.g. clocks.
Extend the simple-mfd documentation to cover this case.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/mfd.txt | 13 +++++++------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/mfd.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/mfd.txt
index 336c0495c8a3..98b4340b65f3 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/mfd.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/mfd.txt
@@ -18,12 +18,13 @@ A typical MFD can be:
Optional properties:

- compatible : "simple-mfd" - this signifies that the operating system should
- consider all subnodes of the MFD device as separate devices akin to how
- "simple-bus" indicates when to see subnodes as children for a simple
- memory-mapped bus. For more complex devices, when the nexus driver has to
- probe registers to figure out what child devices exist etc, this should not
- be used. In the latter case the child devices will be determined by the
- operating system.
+ consider all subnodes of the MFD device as separate and independent devices
+ akin to how "simple-bus" indicates when to see subnodes as children for a
+ simple memory-mapped bus. "Independent devices" means that children do not
+ need any resources to be provided by the parent device.
+ For more complex devices, when the nexus driver has to probe registers to
+ figure out what child devices exist etc, this should not be used. In the
+ latter case the child devices will be determined by the operating system.

- ranges: Describes the address mapping relationship to the parent. Should set
the child's base address to 0, the physical address within parent's address
--
2.43.0