2022-10-19 13:18:45

by Heiko Stuebner

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] RISC-V: Fix compilation without RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM

Hi Anup,

Am Mittwoch, 19. Oktober 2022, 14:16:19 CEST schrieb Anup Patel:
> From: Andrew Jones <[email protected]>
>
> riscv_cbom_block_size and riscv_init_cbom_blocksize() should always
> be available and riscv_init_cbom_blocksize() should always be
> invoked, even when compiling without RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM enabled. This
> is because disabling RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM means "don't use zicbom
> instructions in the kernel" not "pretend there isn't zicbom, even
> when there is". When zicbom is available, whether the kernel enables
> its use with RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM or not, KVM will offer it to guests.
> Ensure we can build KVM and that the block size is initialized even
> when compiling without RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM.

either I'm way very low on coffee or something is strange here :-) .

I can fully grasp the need to init the cbom blocksize for guests, even when
the main kernel isn't using it, but below in the patch itself it is still:

+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM
+void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void)
+{
[...]

so the init_cbom_blocksize function is still inside a RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM
ifdef?


Heiko


>
> Fixes: 8f7e001e0325 ("RISC-V: Clean up the Zicbom block size probing")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c | 41 ---------------------------------
> 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c b/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c
> index 6cb7d96ad9c7..f318b2553612 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c
> @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
> * Copyright (C) 2017 SiFive
> */
>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> @@ -86,3 +88,42 @@ void flush_icache_pte(pte_t pte)
> flush_icache_all();
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
> +
> +unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size;
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(riscv_cbom_block_size);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM
> +void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void)
> +{
> + struct device_node *node;
> + unsigned long cbom_hartid;
> + u32 val, probed_block_size;
> + int ret;
> +
> + probed_block_size = 0;
> + for_each_of_cpu_node(node) {
> + unsigned long hartid;
> +
> + ret = riscv_of_processor_hartid(node, &hartid);
> + if (ret)
> + continue;
> +
> + /* set block-size for cbom extension if available */
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "riscv,cbom-block-size", &val);
> + if (ret)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (!probed_block_size) {
> + probed_block_size = val;
> + cbom_hartid = hartid;
> + } else {
> + if (probed_block_size != val)
> + pr_warn("cbom-block-size mismatched between harts %lu and %lu\n",
> + cbom_hartid, hartid);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (probed_block_size)
> + riscv_cbom_block_size = probed_block_size;
> +}
> +#endif
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c b/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
> index b0add983530a..d919efab6eba 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
> @@ -8,13 +8,8 @@
> #include <linux/dma-direct.h>
> #include <linux/dma-map-ops.h>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> -#include <linux/of.h>
> -#include <linux/of_device.h>
> #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
>
> -unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size;
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(riscv_cbom_block_size);
> -
> static bool noncoherent_supported;
>
> void arch_sync_dma_for_device(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size,
> @@ -77,42 +72,6 @@ void arch_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, u64 size,
> dev->dma_coherent = coherent;
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM
> -void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void)
> -{
> - struct device_node *node;
> - unsigned long cbom_hartid;
> - u32 val, probed_block_size;
> - int ret;
> -
> - probed_block_size = 0;
> - for_each_of_cpu_node(node) {
> - unsigned long hartid;
> -
> - ret = riscv_of_processor_hartid(node, &hartid);
> - if (ret)
> - continue;
> -
> - /* set block-size for cbom extension if available */
> - ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "riscv,cbom-block-size", &val);
> - if (ret)
> - continue;
> -
> - if (!probed_block_size) {
> - probed_block_size = val;
> - cbom_hartid = hartid;
> - } else {
> - if (probed_block_size != val)
> - pr_warn("cbom-block-size mismatched between harts %lu and %lu\n",
> - cbom_hartid, hartid);
> - }
> - }
> -
> - if (probed_block_size)
> - riscv_cbom_block_size = probed_block_size;
> -}
> -#endif
> -
> void riscv_noncoherent_supported(void)
> {
> WARN(!riscv_cbom_block_size,
>





2022-10-19 13:18:46

by Conor Dooley

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] RISC-V: Fix compilation without RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM

On 19/10/2022 13:30, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> Hi Anup,
>
> Am Mittwoch, 19. Oktober 2022, 14:16:19 CEST schrieb Anup Patel:
>> From: Andrew Jones <[email protected]>
>>
>> riscv_cbom_block_size and riscv_init_cbom_blocksize() should always
>> be available and riscv_init_cbom_blocksize() should always be
>> invoked, even when compiling without RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM enabled. This
>> is because disabling RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM means "don't use zicbom
>> instructions in the kernel" not "pretend there isn't zicbom, even
>> when there is". When zicbom is available, whether the kernel enables
>> its use with RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM or not, KVM will offer it to guests.
>> Ensure we can build KVM and that the block size is initialized even
>> when compiling without RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM.
>
> either I'm way very low on coffee or something is strange here :-) .
>
> I can fully grasp the need to init the cbom blocksize for guests, even when
> the main kernel isn't using it, but below in the patch itself it is still:
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM
> +void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void)
> +{
> [...]
>
> so the init_cbom_blocksize function is still inside a RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM
> ifdef?

FWIW:
Drew's patch, or at least the version of it that I have been using/did
a review of, does not have init_cbom_blocksize() inside such a #ifdef.

>
>
> Heiko
>
>
>>
>> Fixes: 8f7e001e0325 ("RISC-V: Clean up the Zicbom block size probing")
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <[email protected]>
>> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c | 41 ---------------------------------
>> 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c b/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c
>> index 6cb7d96ad9c7..f318b2553612 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c
>> @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
>> * Copyright (C) 2017 SiFive
>> */
>>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>> #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>> @@ -86,3 +88,42 @@ void flush_icache_pte(pte_t pte)
>> flush_icache_all();
>> }
>> #endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
>> +
>> +unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size;
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(riscv_cbom_block_size);
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM
>> +void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *node;
>> + unsigned long cbom_hartid;
>> + u32 val, probed_block_size;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + probed_block_size = 0;
>> + for_each_of_cpu_node(node) {
>> + unsigned long hartid;
>> +
>> + ret = riscv_of_processor_hartid(node, &hartid);
>> + if (ret)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + /* set block-size for cbom extension if available */
>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "riscv,cbom-block-size", &val);
>> + if (ret)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + if (!probed_block_size) {
>> + probed_block_size = val;
>> + cbom_hartid = hartid;
>> + } else {
>> + if (probed_block_size != val)
>> + pr_warn("cbom-block-size mismatched between harts %lu and %lu\n",
>> + cbom_hartid, hartid);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (probed_block_size)
>> + riscv_cbom_block_size = probed_block_size;
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c b/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
>> index b0add983530a..d919efab6eba 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
>> @@ -8,13 +8,8 @@
>> #include <linux/dma-direct.h>
>> #include <linux/dma-map-ops.h>
>> #include <linux/mm.h>
>> -#include <linux/of.h>
>> -#include <linux/of_device.h>
>> #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
>>
>> -unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size;
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(riscv_cbom_block_size);
>> -
>> static bool noncoherent_supported;
>>
>> void arch_sync_dma_for_device(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size,
>> @@ -77,42 +72,6 @@ void arch_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, u64 size,
>> dev->dma_coherent = coherent;
>> }
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM
>> -void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void)
>> -{
>> - struct device_node *node;
>> - unsigned long cbom_hartid;
>> - u32 val, probed_block_size;
>> - int ret;
>> -
>> - probed_block_size = 0;
>> - for_each_of_cpu_node(node) {
>> - unsigned long hartid;
>> -
>> - ret = riscv_of_processor_hartid(node, &hartid);
>> - if (ret)
>> - continue;
>> -
>> - /* set block-size for cbom extension if available */
>> - ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "riscv,cbom-block-size", &val);
>> - if (ret)
>> - continue;
>> -
>> - if (!probed_block_size) {
>> - probed_block_size = val;
>> - cbom_hartid = hartid;
>> - } else {
>> - if (probed_block_size != val)
>> - pr_warn("cbom-block-size mismatched between harts %lu and %lu\n",
>> - cbom_hartid, hartid);
>> - }
>> - }
>> -
>> - if (probed_block_size)
>> - riscv_cbom_block_size = probed_block_size;
>> -}
>> -#endif
>> -
>> void riscv_noncoherent_supported(void)
>> {
>> WARN(!riscv_cbom_block_size,
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

2022-10-19 13:21:20

by Anup Patel

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] RISC-V: Fix compilation without RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM

On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 6:01 PM Heiko Stuebner <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Anup,
>
> Am Mittwoch, 19. Oktober 2022, 14:16:19 CEST schrieb Anup Patel:
> > From: Andrew Jones <[email protected]>
> >
> > riscv_cbom_block_size and riscv_init_cbom_blocksize() should always
> > be available and riscv_init_cbom_blocksize() should always be
> > invoked, even when compiling without RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM enabled. This
> > is because disabling RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM means "don't use zicbom
> > instructions in the kernel" not "pretend there isn't zicbom, even
> > when there is". When zicbom is available, whether the kernel enables
> > its use with RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM or not, KVM will offer it to guests.
> > Ensure we can build KVM and that the block size is initialized even
> > when compiling without RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM.
>
> either I'm way very low on coffee or something is strange here :-) .
>
> I can fully grasp the need to init the cbom blocksize for guests, even when
> the main kernel isn't using it, but below in the patch itself it is still:

The Guest might have pass-through access to a device which is not
cache-coherent whereas Host might have all devices cache-coherent.

>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM
> +void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void)
> +{
> [...]
>
> so the init_cbom_blocksize function is still inside a RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM
> ifdef?

Argh, I mixed changes from my previous patch and Drew's patch.

I will quickly send v4. Thanks for catching.

Regards,
Anup

>
>
> Heiko
>
>
> >
> > Fixes: 8f7e001e0325 ("RISC-V: Clean up the Zicbom block size probing")
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c | 41 ---------------------------------
> > 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c b/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c
> > index 6cb7d96ad9c7..f318b2553612 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c
> > @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
> > * Copyright (C) 2017 SiFive
> > */
> >
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> > #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > @@ -86,3 +88,42 @@ void flush_icache_pte(pte_t pte)
> > flush_icache_all();
> > }
> > #endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
> > +
> > +unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size;
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(riscv_cbom_block_size);
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM
> > +void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void)
> > +{
> > + struct device_node *node;
> > + unsigned long cbom_hartid;
> > + u32 val, probed_block_size;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + probed_block_size = 0;
> > + for_each_of_cpu_node(node) {
> > + unsigned long hartid;
> > +
> > + ret = riscv_of_processor_hartid(node, &hartid);
> > + if (ret)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + /* set block-size for cbom extension if available */
> > + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "riscv,cbom-block-size", &val);
> > + if (ret)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + if (!probed_block_size) {
> > + probed_block_size = val;
> > + cbom_hartid = hartid;
> > + } else {
> > + if (probed_block_size != val)
> > + pr_warn("cbom-block-size mismatched between harts %lu and %lu\n",
> > + cbom_hartid, hartid);
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (probed_block_size)
> > + riscv_cbom_block_size = probed_block_size;
> > +}
> > +#endif
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c b/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
> > index b0add983530a..d919efab6eba 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
> > @@ -8,13 +8,8 @@
> > #include <linux/dma-direct.h>
> > #include <linux/dma-map-ops.h>
> > #include <linux/mm.h>
> > -#include <linux/of.h>
> > -#include <linux/of_device.h>
> > #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> >
> > -unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size;
> > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(riscv_cbom_block_size);
> > -
> > static bool noncoherent_supported;
> >
> > void arch_sync_dma_for_device(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size,
> > @@ -77,42 +72,6 @@ void arch_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, u64 size,
> > dev->dma_coherent = coherent;
> > }
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM
> > -void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void)
> > -{
> > - struct device_node *node;
> > - unsigned long cbom_hartid;
> > - u32 val, probed_block_size;
> > - int ret;
> > -
> > - probed_block_size = 0;
> > - for_each_of_cpu_node(node) {
> > - unsigned long hartid;
> > -
> > - ret = riscv_of_processor_hartid(node, &hartid);
> > - if (ret)
> > - continue;
> > -
> > - /* set block-size for cbom extension if available */
> > - ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "riscv,cbom-block-size", &val);
> > - if (ret)
> > - continue;
> > -
> > - if (!probed_block_size) {
> > - probed_block_size = val;
> > - cbom_hartid = hartid;
> > - } else {
> > - if (probed_block_size != val)
> > - pr_warn("cbom-block-size mismatched between harts %lu and %lu\n",
> > - cbom_hartid, hartid);
> > - }
> > - }
> > -
> > - if (probed_block_size)
> > - riscv_cbom_block_size = probed_block_size;
> > -}
> > -#endif
> > -
> > void riscv_noncoherent_supported(void)
> > {
> > WARN(!riscv_cbom_block_size,
> >
>
>
>
>