s/particuar/particular/
Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
index 7369dd86d3a9..6cd38e407145 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
* The currently only reason we need to keep track of views is that if we
* destroy a hardware surface, all views pointing to it must also be destroyed,
* otherwise the device will error.
- * So in particuar if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing
+ * So in particular if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing
* to it, and all context bindings of that view. Similarly we must restore
* the view bindings, views and surfaces pointed to by the views when a
* context is referenced in the command stream.
--
2.26.2
On Sun, 21 Mar 2021, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>
> s/particuar/particular/
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
> index 7369dd86d3a9..6cd38e407145 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
> * The currently only reason we need to keep track of views is that if we
> * destroy a hardware surface, all views pointing to it must also be destroyed,
> * otherwise the device will error.
> - * So in particuar if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing
> + * So in particular if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing
> * to it, and all context bindings of that view. Similarly we must restore
> * the view bindings, views and surfaces pointed to by the views when a
> * context is referenced in the command stream.
> --
> 2.26.2
>
>
> On Mar 20, 2021, at 17:16, Bhaskar Chowdhury <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> s/particuar/particular/
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
> index 7369dd86d3a9..6cd38e407145 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
> * The currently only reason we need to keep track of views is that if we
> * destroy a hardware surface, all views pointing to it must also be destroyed,
> * otherwise the device will error.
> - * So in particuar if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing
> + * So in particular if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing
> * to it, and all context bindings of that view. Similarly we must restore
> * the view bindings, views and surfaces pointed to by the views when a
> * context is referenced in the command stream.
> --
> 2.26.2
>
Looks good. I’ll push it through the drm-misc tree on my next series. Unless of course you want to push it through a different tree in which case:
Reviewed-by: Zack Rusin <[email protected]>
z