We found the following dmesg calltrace when testing the GMAC NIC notebook:
[9.448656] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[9.448658] Unbalanced IRQ 43 wake disable
[9.448673] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1083 at kernel/irq/manage.c:688 irq_set_irq_wake+0xe0/0x128
[9.448717] CPU: 3 PID: 1083 Comm: ethtool Tainted: G O 4.19 #1
[9.448773] ...
[9.448774] Call Trace:
[9.448781] [<9000000000209b5c>] show_stack+0x34/0x140
[9.448788] [<9000000000d52700>] dump_stack+0x98/0xd0
[9.448794] [<9000000000228610>] __warn+0xa8/0x120
[9.448797] [<9000000000d2fb60>] report_bug+0x98/0x130
[9.448800] [<900000000020a418>] do_bp+0x248/0x2f0
[9.448805] [<90000000002035f4>] handle_bp_int+0x4c/0x78
[9.448808] [<900000000029ea40>] irq_set_irq_wake+0xe0/0x128
[9.448813] [<9000000000a96a7c>] stmmac_set_wol+0x134/0x150
[9.448819] [<9000000000be6ed0>] dev_ethtool+0x1368/0x2440
[9.448824] [<9000000000c08350>] dev_ioctl+0x1f8/0x3e0
[9.448827] [<9000000000bb2a34>] sock_ioctl+0x2a4/0x450
[9.448832] [<900000000046f044>] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa4/0x738
[9.448834] [<900000000046f778>] ksys_ioctl+0xa0/0xe8
[9.448837] [<900000000046f7d8>] sys_ioctl+0x18/0x28
[9.448840] [<9000000000211ab4>] syscall_common+0x20/0x34
[9.448842] ---[ end trace 40c18d9aec863c3e ]---
Multiple disable_irq_wake() calls will keep decreasing the IRQ
wake_depth, When wake_depth is 0, calling disable_irq_wake() again,
will report the above calltrace.
Due to the need to appear in pairs, we cannot call disable_irq_wake()
without calling enable_irq_wake(). Fix this by making sure there are
no unbalanced disable_irq_wake() calls.
Signed-off-by: Qiang Ma <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h | 1 +
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c | 10 ++++++++--
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 1 +
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
index cd7a9768de5f..b8c93b881a65 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
@@ -255,6 +255,7 @@ struct stmmac_priv {
u32 msg_enable;
int wolopts;
int wol_irq;
+ bool wol_irq_disabled;
int clk_csr;
struct timer_list eee_ctrl_timer;
int lpi_irq;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c
index f628411ae4ae..9a4d9492a781 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c
@@ -825,10 +825,16 @@ static int stmmac_set_wol(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_wolinfo *wol)
if (wol->wolopts) {
pr_info("stmmac: wakeup enable\n");
device_set_wakeup_enable(priv->device, 1);
- enable_irq_wake(priv->wol_irq);
+ /* Avoid unbalanced enable_irq_wake calls */
+ if (priv->wol_irq_disabled)
+ enable_irq_wake(priv->wol_irq);
+ priv->wol_irq_disabled = false;
} else {
device_set_wakeup_enable(priv->device, 0);
- disable_irq_wake(priv->wol_irq);
+ /* Avoid unbalanced disable_irq_wake calls */
+ if (!priv->wol_irq_disabled)
+ disable_irq_wake(priv->wol_irq);
+ priv->wol_irq_disabled = true;
}
mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
index 37e64283f910..baa396621ed8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
@@ -3565,6 +3565,7 @@ static int stmmac_request_irq_multi_msi(struct net_device *dev)
/* Request the Wake IRQ in case of another line
* is used for WoL
*/
+ priv->wol_irq_disabled = true;
if (priv->wol_irq > 0 && priv->wol_irq != dev->irq) {
int_name = priv->int_name_wol;
sprintf(int_name, "%s:%s", dev->name, "wol");
--
2.20.1
+ Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 10:12:49AM +0800, Qiang Ma wrote:
> We found the following dmesg calltrace when testing the GMAC NIC notebook:
>
> [9.448656] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [9.448658] Unbalanced IRQ 43 wake disable
> [9.448673] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1083 at kernel/irq/manage.c:688 irq_set_irq_wake+0xe0/0x128
> [9.448717] CPU: 3 PID: 1083 Comm: ethtool Tainted: G O 4.19 #1
> [9.448773] ...
> [9.448774] Call Trace:
> [9.448781] [<9000000000209b5c>] show_stack+0x34/0x140
> [9.448788] [<9000000000d52700>] dump_stack+0x98/0xd0
> [9.448794] [<9000000000228610>] __warn+0xa8/0x120
> [9.448797] [<9000000000d2fb60>] report_bug+0x98/0x130
> [9.448800] [<900000000020a418>] do_bp+0x248/0x2f0
> [9.448805] [<90000000002035f4>] handle_bp_int+0x4c/0x78
> [9.448808] [<900000000029ea40>] irq_set_irq_wake+0xe0/0x128
> [9.448813] [<9000000000a96a7c>] stmmac_set_wol+0x134/0x150
> [9.448819] [<9000000000be6ed0>] dev_ethtool+0x1368/0x2440
> [9.448824] [<9000000000c08350>] dev_ioctl+0x1f8/0x3e0
> [9.448827] [<9000000000bb2a34>] sock_ioctl+0x2a4/0x450
> [9.448832] [<900000000046f044>] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa4/0x738
> [9.448834] [<900000000046f778>] ksys_ioctl+0xa0/0xe8
> [9.448837] [<900000000046f7d8>] sys_ioctl+0x18/0x28
> [9.448840] [<9000000000211ab4>] syscall_common+0x20/0x34
> [9.448842] ---[ end trace 40c18d9aec863c3e ]---
>
> Multiple disable_irq_wake() calls will keep decreasing the IRQ
> wake_depth, When wake_depth is 0, calling disable_irq_wake() again,
> will report the above calltrace.
>
> Due to the need to appear in pairs, we cannot call disable_irq_wake()
> without calling enable_irq_wake(). Fix this by making sure there are
> no unbalanced disable_irq_wake() calls.
Hi Qiang Ma,
This seems to be a fix, so I think it should be targeted at net:
Subject: [PATCH net] ...
And have a fixes tag, perhaps:
Fixes: 3172d3afa998 ("stmmac: support wake up irq from external sources (v3)")
I don't think there is a need to repost this patch because of the above,
but please keep it in mind for next time.
> Signed-off-by: Qiang Ma <[email protected]>
I see that the approach taken here is the same as that taken
by bcm_sysport_set_wol() to what seems to be a similar problem [1].
So the code change itself looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
[1] 61b423a8a0bd ("net: systemport: avoid unbalanced enable_irq_wake calls")
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/61b423a8a0bd
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h | 1 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c | 10 ++++++++--
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
> index cd7a9768de5f..b8c93b881a65 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
> @@ -255,6 +255,7 @@ struct stmmac_priv {
> u32 msg_enable;
> int wolopts;
> int wol_irq;
> + bool wol_irq_disabled;
> int clk_csr;
> struct timer_list eee_ctrl_timer;
> int lpi_irq;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c
> index f628411ae4ae..9a4d9492a781 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c
> @@ -825,10 +825,16 @@ static int stmmac_set_wol(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_wolinfo *wol)
> if (wol->wolopts) {
> pr_info("stmmac: wakeup enable\n");
> device_set_wakeup_enable(priv->device, 1);
> - enable_irq_wake(priv->wol_irq);
> + /* Avoid unbalanced enable_irq_wake calls */
> + if (priv->wol_irq_disabled)
> + enable_irq_wake(priv->wol_irq);
> + priv->wol_irq_disabled = false;
> } else {
> device_set_wakeup_enable(priv->device, 0);
> - disable_irq_wake(priv->wol_irq);
> + /* Avoid unbalanced disable_irq_wake calls */
> + if (!priv->wol_irq_disabled)
> + disable_irq_wake(priv->wol_irq);
> + priv->wol_irq_disabled = true;
> }
>
> mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> index 37e64283f910..baa396621ed8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> @@ -3565,6 +3565,7 @@ static int stmmac_request_irq_multi_msi(struct net_device *dev)
> /* Request the Wake IRQ in case of another line
> * is used for WoL
> */
> + priv->wol_irq_disabled = true;
> if (priv->wol_irq > 0 && priv->wol_irq != dev->irq) {
> int_name = priv->int_name_wol;
> sprintf(int_name, "%s:%s", dev->name, "wol");
> --
> 2.20.1
>
On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 13:42:38 +0000
Simon Horman <[email protected]> wrote:
> + Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
>
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 10:12:49AM +0800, Qiang Ma wrote:
> > We found the following dmesg calltrace when testing the GMAC NIC
> > notebook:
> >
> > [9.448656] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > [9.448658] Unbalanced IRQ 43 wake disable
> > [9.448673] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1083 at kernel/irq/manage.c:688
> > irq_set_irq_wake+0xe0/0x128 [9.448717] CPU: 3 PID: 1083 Comm:
> > ethtool Tainted: G O 4.19 #1 [9.448773] ...
> > [9.448774] Call Trace:
> > [9.448781] [<9000000000209b5c>] show_stack+0x34/0x140
> > [9.448788] [<9000000000d52700>] dump_stack+0x98/0xd0
> > [9.448794] [<9000000000228610>] __warn+0xa8/0x120
> > [9.448797] [<9000000000d2fb60>] report_bug+0x98/0x130
> > [9.448800] [<900000000020a418>] do_bp+0x248/0x2f0
> > [9.448805] [<90000000002035f4>] handle_bp_int+0x4c/0x78
> > [9.448808] [<900000000029ea40>] irq_set_irq_wake+0xe0/0x128
> > [9.448813] [<9000000000a96a7c>] stmmac_set_wol+0x134/0x150
> > [9.448819] [<9000000000be6ed0>] dev_ethtool+0x1368/0x2440
> > [9.448824] [<9000000000c08350>] dev_ioctl+0x1f8/0x3e0
> > [9.448827] [<9000000000bb2a34>] sock_ioctl+0x2a4/0x450
> > [9.448832] [<900000000046f044>] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa4/0x738
> > [9.448834] [<900000000046f778>] ksys_ioctl+0xa0/0xe8
> > [9.448837] [<900000000046f7d8>] sys_ioctl+0x18/0x28
> > [9.448840] [<9000000000211ab4>] syscall_common+0x20/0x34
> > [9.448842] ---[ end trace 40c18d9aec863c3e ]---
> >
> > Multiple disable_irq_wake() calls will keep decreasing the IRQ
> > wake_depth, When wake_depth is 0, calling disable_irq_wake() again,
> > will report the above calltrace.
> >
> > Due to the need to appear in pairs, we cannot call
> > disable_irq_wake() without calling enable_irq_wake(). Fix this by
> > making sure there are no unbalanced disable_irq_wake() calls.
>
>
> Hi Qiang Ma,
>
> This seems to be a fix, so I think it should be targeted at net:
>
> Subject: [PATCH net] ...
>
> And have a fixes tag, perhaps:
>
> Fixes: 3172d3afa998 ("stmmac: support wake up irq from
> external sources (v3)")
>
> I don't think there is a need to repost this patch because of the
> above, but please keep it in mind for next time.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Qiang Ma <[email protected]>
>
> I see that the approach taken here is the same as that taken
> by bcm_sysport_set_wol() to what seems to be a similar problem [1].
> So the code change itself looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
>
> [1] 61b423a8a0bd ("net: systemport: avoid unbalanced enable_irq_wake
> calls") https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/61b423a8a0bd
>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h | 1 +
> > drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c | 10
> > ++++++++-- drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c |
> > 1 + 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h index
> > cd7a9768de5f..b8c93b881a65 100644 ---
> > a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h +++
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h @@ -255,6 +255,7 @@
> > struct stmmac_priv { u32 msg_enable;
> > int wolopts;
> > int wol_irq;
> > + bool wol_irq_disabled;
> > int clk_csr;
> > struct timer_list eee_ctrl_timer;
> > int lpi_irq;
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c index
> > f628411ae4ae..9a4d9492a781 100644 ---
> > a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c +++
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c @@ -825,10
> > +825,16 @@ static int stmmac_set_wol(struct net_device *dev, struct
> > ethtool_wolinfo *wol) if (wol->wolopts) { pr_info("stmmac: wakeup
> > enable\n"); device_set_wakeup_enable(priv->device, 1);
> > - enable_irq_wake(priv->wol_irq);
> > + /* Avoid unbalanced enable_irq_wake calls */
> > + if (priv->wol_irq_disabled)
> > + enable_irq_wake(priv->wol_irq);
> > + priv->wol_irq_disabled = false;
> > } else {
> > device_set_wakeup_enable(priv->device, 0);
> > - disable_irq_wake(priv->wol_irq);
> > + /* Avoid unbalanced disable_irq_wake calls */
> > + if (!priv->wol_irq_disabled)
> > + disable_irq_wake(priv->wol_irq);
> > + priv->wol_irq_disabled = true;
> > }
> >
> > mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c index
> > 37e64283f910..baa396621ed8 100644 ---
> > a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c +++
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c @@ -3565,6
> > +3565,7 @@ static int stmmac_request_irq_multi_msi(struct
> > net_device *dev) /* Request the Wake IRQ in case of another line
> > * is used for WoL
> > */
> > + priv->wol_irq_disabled = true;
> > if (priv->wol_irq > 0 && priv->wol_irq != dev->irq) {
> > int_name = priv->int_name_wol;
> > sprintf(int_name, "%s:%s", dev->name, "wol");
> > --
> > 2.20.1
> >
>
Hi Simon Horman,
The latest code does not seem to see the stmmac driver to avoid
irq_wake call related fix committed, this fix is mainly for stmmac,
refer to the commit:
commit 61b423a8a0bd9aeaa046f9a24bed42e3a953a936 Author:
Florian Fainelli <[email protected]> Date: Fri Oct 10 10:51:54
2014 -0700
net: systemport: avoid unbalanced enable_irq_wake calls
commit 083731a8fbe71d83fc908adf137dc98ee352f280
Author: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
Date: Fri Oct 10 10:51:53 2014 -0700
net: bcmgenet: avoid unbalanced enable_irq_wake calls
Therefore, I think this submission is necessary at this time.
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2024 10:12:49 +0800 you wrote:
> We found the following dmesg calltrace when testing the GMAC NIC notebook:
>
> [9.448656] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [9.448658] Unbalanced IRQ 43 wake disable
> [9.448673] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1083 at kernel/irq/manage.c:688 irq_set_irq_wake+0xe0/0x128
> [9.448717] CPU: 3 PID: 1083 Comm: ethtool Tainted: G O 4.19 #1
> [9.448773] ...
> [9.448774] Call Trace:
> [9.448781] [<9000000000209b5c>] show_stack+0x34/0x140
> [9.448788] [<9000000000d52700>] dump_stack+0x98/0xd0
> [9.448794] [<9000000000228610>] __warn+0xa8/0x120
> [9.448797] [<9000000000d2fb60>] report_bug+0x98/0x130
> [9.448800] [<900000000020a418>] do_bp+0x248/0x2f0
> [9.448805] [<90000000002035f4>] handle_bp_int+0x4c/0x78
> [9.448808] [<900000000029ea40>] irq_set_irq_wake+0xe0/0x128
> [9.448813] [<9000000000a96a7c>] stmmac_set_wol+0x134/0x150
> [9.448819] [<9000000000be6ed0>] dev_ethtool+0x1368/0x2440
> [9.448824] [<9000000000c08350>] dev_ioctl+0x1f8/0x3e0
> [9.448827] [<9000000000bb2a34>] sock_ioctl+0x2a4/0x450
> [9.448832] [<900000000046f044>] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa4/0x738
> [9.448834] [<900000000046f778>] ksys_ioctl+0xa0/0xe8
> [9.448837] [<900000000046f7d8>] sys_ioctl+0x18/0x28
> [9.448840] [<9000000000211ab4>] syscall_common+0x20/0x34
> [9.448842] ---[ end trace 40c18d9aec863c3e ]---
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- net: stmmac: ethtool: Fixed calltrace caused by unbalanced disable_irq_wake calls
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/a23aa0404218
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 01:57:34PM +0800, Qiang Ma wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 13:42:38 +0000
> Simon Horman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > + Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 10:12:49AM +0800, Qiang Ma wrote:
> > > We found the following dmesg calltrace when testing the GMAC NIC
> > > notebook:
> > >
> > > [9.448656] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > [9.448658] Unbalanced IRQ 43 wake disable
> > > [9.448673] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1083 at kernel/irq/manage.c:688
> > > irq_set_irq_wake+0xe0/0x128 [9.448717] CPU: 3 PID: 1083 Comm:
> > > ethtool Tainted: G O 4.19 #1 [9.448773] ...
> > > [9.448774] Call Trace:
> > > [9.448781] [<9000000000209b5c>] show_stack+0x34/0x140
> > > [9.448788] [<9000000000d52700>] dump_stack+0x98/0xd0
> > > [9.448794] [<9000000000228610>] __warn+0xa8/0x120
> > > [9.448797] [<9000000000d2fb60>] report_bug+0x98/0x130
> > > [9.448800] [<900000000020a418>] do_bp+0x248/0x2f0
> > > [9.448805] [<90000000002035f4>] handle_bp_int+0x4c/0x78
> > > [9.448808] [<900000000029ea40>] irq_set_irq_wake+0xe0/0x128
> > > [9.448813] [<9000000000a96a7c>] stmmac_set_wol+0x134/0x150
> > > [9.448819] [<9000000000be6ed0>] dev_ethtool+0x1368/0x2440
> > > [9.448824] [<9000000000c08350>] dev_ioctl+0x1f8/0x3e0
> > > [9.448827] [<9000000000bb2a34>] sock_ioctl+0x2a4/0x450
> > > [9.448832] [<900000000046f044>] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa4/0x738
> > > [9.448834] [<900000000046f778>] ksys_ioctl+0xa0/0xe8
> > > [9.448837] [<900000000046f7d8>] sys_ioctl+0x18/0x28
> > > [9.448840] [<9000000000211ab4>] syscall_common+0x20/0x34
> > > [9.448842] ---[ end trace 40c18d9aec863c3e ]---
> > >
> > > Multiple disable_irq_wake() calls will keep decreasing the IRQ
> > > wake_depth, When wake_depth is 0, calling disable_irq_wake() again,
> > > will report the above calltrace.
> > >
> > > Due to the need to appear in pairs, we cannot call
> > > disable_irq_wake() without calling enable_irq_wake(). Fix this by
> > > making sure there are no unbalanced disable_irq_wake() calls.
> >
> >
> > Hi Qiang Ma,
> >
> > This seems to be a fix, so I think it should be targeted at net:
> >
> > Subject: [PATCH net] ...
> >
> > And have a fixes tag, perhaps:
> >
> > Fixes: 3172d3afa998 ("stmmac: support wake up irq from
> > external sources (v3)")
> >
> > I don't think there is a need to repost this patch because of the
> > above, but please keep it in mind for next time.
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Qiang Ma <[email protected]>
> >
> > I see that the approach taken here is the same as that taken
> > by bcm_sysport_set_wol() to what seems to be a similar problem [1].
> > So the code change itself looks good to me.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
> >
> > [1] 61b423a8a0bd ("net: systemport: avoid unbalanced enable_irq_wake
> > calls") https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/61b423a8a0bd
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h | 1 +
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c | 10
> > > ++++++++-- drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c |
> > > 1 + 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
> > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h index
> > > cd7a9768de5f..b8c93b881a65 100644 ---
> > > a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h +++
> > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h @@ -255,6 +255,7 @@
> > > struct stmmac_priv { u32 msg_enable;
> > > int wolopts;
> > > int wol_irq;
> > > + bool wol_irq_disabled;
> > > int clk_csr;
> > > struct timer_list eee_ctrl_timer;
> > > int lpi_irq;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c
> > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c index
> > > f628411ae4ae..9a4d9492a781 100644 ---
> > > a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c +++
> > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c @@ -825,10
> > > +825,16 @@ static int stmmac_set_wol(struct net_device *dev, struct
> > > ethtool_wolinfo *wol) if (wol->wolopts) { pr_info("stmmac: wakeup
> > > enable\n"); device_set_wakeup_enable(priv->device, 1);
> > > - enable_irq_wake(priv->wol_irq);
> > > + /* Avoid unbalanced enable_irq_wake calls */
> > > + if (priv->wol_irq_disabled)
> > > + enable_irq_wake(priv->wol_irq);
> > > + priv->wol_irq_disabled = false;
> > > } else {
> > > device_set_wakeup_enable(priv->device, 0);
> > > - disable_irq_wake(priv->wol_irq);
> > > + /* Avoid unbalanced disable_irq_wake calls */
> > > + if (!priv->wol_irq_disabled)
> > > + disable_irq_wake(priv->wol_irq);
> > > + priv->wol_irq_disabled = true;
> > > }
> > >
> > > mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c index
> > > 37e64283f910..baa396621ed8 100644 ---
> > > a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c +++
> > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c @@ -3565,6
> > > +3565,7 @@ static int stmmac_request_irq_multi_msi(struct
> > > net_device *dev) /* Request the Wake IRQ in case of another line
> > > * is used for WoL
> > > */
> > > + priv->wol_irq_disabled = true;
> > > if (priv->wol_irq > 0 && priv->wol_irq != dev->irq) {
> > > int_name = priv->int_name_wol;
> > > sprintf(int_name, "%s:%s", dev->name, "wol");
> > > --
> > > 2.20.1
> > >
> >
>
> Hi Simon Horman,
>
> The latest code does not seem to see the stmmac driver to avoid
> irq_wake call related fix committed, this fix is mainly for stmmac,
> refer to the commit:
>
> commit 61b423a8a0bd9aeaa046f9a24bed42e3a953a936 Author:
> Florian Fainelli <[email protected]> Date: Fri Oct 10 10:51:54
> 2014 -0700
>
> net: systemport: avoid unbalanced enable_irq_wake calls
>
> commit 083731a8fbe71d83fc908adf137dc98ee352f280
> Author: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
> Date: Fri Oct 10 10:51:53 2014 -0700
>
> net: bcmgenet: avoid unbalanced enable_irq_wake calls
>
> Therefore, I think this submission is necessary at this time.
Yes, I agree.
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 10:12:49AM +0800, Qiang Ma wrote:
> We found the following dmesg calltrace when testing the GMAC NIC notebook:
>
> [9.448656] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [9.448658] Unbalanced IRQ 43 wake disable
> [9.448673] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1083 at kernel/irq/manage.c:688 irq_set_irq_wake+0xe0/0x128
> [9.448717] CPU: 3 PID: 1083 Comm: ethtool Tainted: G O 4.19 #1
> [9.448773] ...
> [9.448774] Call Trace:
> [9.448781] [<9000000000209b5c>] show_stack+0x34/0x140
> [9.448788] [<9000000000d52700>] dump_stack+0x98/0xd0
> [9.448794] [<9000000000228610>] __warn+0xa8/0x120
> [9.448797] [<9000000000d2fb60>] report_bug+0x98/0x130
> [9.448800] [<900000000020a418>] do_bp+0x248/0x2f0
> [9.448805] [<90000000002035f4>] handle_bp_int+0x4c/0x78
> [9.448808] [<900000000029ea40>] irq_set_irq_wake+0xe0/0x128
> [9.448813] [<9000000000a96a7c>] stmmac_set_wol+0x134/0x150
> [9.448819] [<9000000000be6ed0>] dev_ethtool+0x1368/0x2440
> [9.448824] [<9000000000c08350>] dev_ioctl+0x1f8/0x3e0
> [9.448827] [<9000000000bb2a34>] sock_ioctl+0x2a4/0x450
> [9.448832] [<900000000046f044>] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa4/0x738
> [9.448834] [<900000000046f778>] ksys_ioctl+0xa0/0xe8
> [9.448837] [<900000000046f7d8>] sys_ioctl+0x18/0x28
> [9.448840] [<9000000000211ab4>] syscall_common+0x20/0x34
> [9.448842] ---[ end trace 40c18d9aec863c3e ]---
>
> Multiple disable_irq_wake() calls will keep decreasing the IRQ
> wake_depth, When wake_depth is 0, calling disable_irq_wake() again,
> will report the above calltrace.
>
> Due to the need to appear in pairs, we cannot call disable_irq_wake()
> without calling enable_irq_wake(). Fix this by making sure there are
> no unbalanced disable_irq_wake() calls.
Just for my understanding. You trigger this by doing lots of
ethtool -s eth42 wol g
or similar without doing a matching
ethtool -s eth42 wol d
to disable wol?
Its a bit late now, but its good to give instructions how to reproduce
the issue in the commit message.
Andrew
On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 23:27:39 +0100
Andrew Lunn <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 10:12:49AM +0800, Qiang Ma wrote:
> > We found the following dmesg calltrace when testing the GMAC NIC
> > notebook:
> >
> > [9.448656] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > [9.448658] Unbalanced IRQ 43 wake disable
> > [9.448673] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1083 at kernel/irq/manage.c:688
> > irq_set_irq_wake+0xe0/0x128 [9.448717] CPU: 3 PID: 1083 Comm:
> > ethtool Tainted: G O 4.19 #1 [9.448773] ...
> > [9.448774] Call Trace:
> > [9.448781] [<9000000000209b5c>] show_stack+0x34/0x140
> > [9.448788] [<9000000000d52700>] dump_stack+0x98/0xd0
> > [9.448794] [<9000000000228610>] __warn+0xa8/0x120
> > [9.448797] [<9000000000d2fb60>] report_bug+0x98/0x130
> > [9.448800] [<900000000020a418>] do_bp+0x248/0x2f0
> > [9.448805] [<90000000002035f4>] handle_bp_int+0x4c/0x78
> > [9.448808] [<900000000029ea40>] irq_set_irq_wake+0xe0/0x128
> > [9.448813] [<9000000000a96a7c>] stmmac_set_wol+0x134/0x150
> > [9.448819] [<9000000000be6ed0>] dev_ethtool+0x1368/0x2440
> > [9.448824] [<9000000000c08350>] dev_ioctl+0x1f8/0x3e0
> > [9.448827] [<9000000000bb2a34>] sock_ioctl+0x2a4/0x450
> > [9.448832] [<900000000046f044>] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa4/0x738
> > [9.448834] [<900000000046f778>] ksys_ioctl+0xa0/0xe8
> > [9.448837] [<900000000046f7d8>] sys_ioctl+0x18/0x28
> > [9.448840] [<9000000000211ab4>] syscall_common+0x20/0x34
> > [9.448842] ---[ end trace 40c18d9aec863c3e ]---
> >
> > Multiple disable_irq_wake() calls will keep decreasing the IRQ
> > wake_depth, When wake_depth is 0, calling disable_irq_wake() again,
> > will report the above calltrace.
> >
> > Due to the need to appear in pairs, we cannot call
> > disable_irq_wake() without calling enable_irq_wake(). Fix this by
> > making sure there are no unbalanced disable_irq_wake() calls.
>
> Just for my understanding. You trigger this by doing lots of
>
> ethtool -s eth42 wol g
>
> or similar without doing a matching
>
> ethtool -s eth42 wol d
>
> to disable wol?
>
> Its a bit late now, but its good to give instructions how to reproduce
> the issue in the commit message.
>
> Andrew
>
yes, my environment has not call enable_irq_wake(), so calling
disable_irq_wake() directly through the "ethtool -s ethxx wol d"
command will cause this problem.
Qiang Ma