2022-02-07 17:26:03

by Yang Li

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH -next] scsi: pm8001: clean up some inconsistent indenting

Eliminate the follow smatch warning:
drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_ctl.c:760 pm8001_update_flash() warn:
inconsistent indenting

Reported-by: Abaci Robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Yang Li <[email protected]>
---
drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_ctl.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_ctl.c b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_ctl.c
index 41a63c9b719b..213ebf39261f 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_ctl.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_ctl.c
@@ -755,36 +755,41 @@ static int pm8001_update_flash(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
fwControl->retcode = 0;/* OUT */
fwControl->offset = loopNumber * IOCTL_BUF_SIZE;/*OUT */

- /* for the last chunk of data in case file size is not even with
- 4k, load only the rest*/
- if (((loopcount-loopNumber) == 1) &&
- ((partitionSize + HEADER_LEN) % IOCTL_BUF_SIZE)) {
- fwControl->len =
- (partitionSize + HEADER_LEN) % IOCTL_BUF_SIZE;
- memcpy((u8 *)fwControl->buffer,
- (u8 *)pm8001_ha->fw_image->data + sizeRead,
- (partitionSize + HEADER_LEN) % IOCTL_BUF_SIZE);
- sizeRead +=
- (partitionSize + HEADER_LEN) % IOCTL_BUF_SIZE;
- } else {
- memcpy((u8 *)fwControl->buffer,
- (u8 *)pm8001_ha->fw_image->data + sizeRead,
- IOCTL_BUF_SIZE);
- sizeRead += IOCTL_BUF_SIZE;
- }
-
- pm8001_ha->nvmd_completion = &completion;
- ret = PM8001_CHIP_DISP->fw_flash_update_req(pm8001_ha, payload);
- if (ret) {
- pm8001_ha->fw_status = FAIL_OUT_MEMORY;
- goto out;
- }
- wait_for_completion(&completion);
- if (fwControl->retcode > FLASH_UPDATE_IN_PROGRESS) {
- pm8001_ha->fw_status = fwControl->retcode;
- ret = -EFAULT;
- goto out;
- }
+ /* for the last chunk of data in case file
+ * size is not even with 4k, load only the rest
+ */
+ if (((loopcount-loopNumber) == 1) &&
+ ((partitionSize + HEADER_LEN) % IOCTL_BUF_SIZE)) {
+ fwControl->len =
+ (partitionSize + HEADER_LEN) %
+ IOCTL_BUF_SIZE;
+ memcpy((u8 *)fwControl->buffer,
+ (u8 *)pm8001_ha->fw_image->data + sizeRead,
+ (partitionSize + HEADER_LEN) %
+ IOCTL_BUF_SIZE);
+ sizeRead +=
+ (partitionSize + HEADER_LEN) %
+ IOCTL_BUF_SIZE;
+ } else {
+ memcpy((u8 *)fwControl->buffer,
+ (u8 *)pm8001_ha->fw_image->data + sizeRead,
+ IOCTL_BUF_SIZE);
+ sizeRead += IOCTL_BUF_SIZE;
+ }
+
+ pm8001_ha->nvmd_completion = &completion;
+ ret = PM8001_CHIP_DISP->fw_flash_update_req(pm8001_ha,
+ payload);
+ if (ret) {
+ pm8001_ha->fw_status = FAIL_OUT_MEMORY;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ wait_for_completion(&completion);
+ if (fwControl->retcode > FLASH_UPDATE_IN_PROGRESS) {
+ pm8001_ha->fw_status = fwControl->retcode;
+ ret = -EFAULT;
+ goto out;
+ }
}
}
out:
--
2.20.1.7.g153144c



2022-02-09 04:53:00

by Damien Le Moal

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] scsi: pm8001: clean up some inconsistent indenting

On 2/6/22 21:55, Yang Li wrote:
> Eliminate the follow smatch warning:
> drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_ctl.c:760 pm8001_update_flash() warn:
> inconsistent indenting
>
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Li <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_ctl.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_ctl.c b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_ctl.c
> index 41a63c9b719b..213ebf39261f 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_ctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_ctl.c
> @@ -755,36 +755,41 @@ static int pm8001_update_flash(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
> fwControl->retcode = 0;/* OUT */
> fwControl->offset = loopNumber * IOCTL_BUF_SIZE;/*OUT */
>
> - /* for the last chunk of data in case file size is not even with
> - 4k, load only the rest*/
> - if (((loopcount-loopNumber) == 1) &&
> - ((partitionSize + HEADER_LEN) % IOCTL_BUF_SIZE)) {
> - fwControl->len =
> - (partitionSize + HEADER_LEN) % IOCTL_BUF_SIZE;
> - memcpy((u8 *)fwControl->buffer,
> - (u8 *)pm8001_ha->fw_image->data + sizeRead,
> - (partitionSize + HEADER_LEN) % IOCTL_BUF_SIZE);
> - sizeRead +=
> - (partitionSize + HEADER_LEN) % IOCTL_BUF_SIZE;
> - } else {
> - memcpy((u8 *)fwControl->buffer,
> - (u8 *)pm8001_ha->fw_image->data + sizeRead,
> - IOCTL_BUF_SIZE);
> - sizeRead += IOCTL_BUF_SIZE;
> - }
> -
> - pm8001_ha->nvmd_completion = &completion;
> - ret = PM8001_CHIP_DISP->fw_flash_update_req(pm8001_ha, payload);
> - if (ret) {
> - pm8001_ha->fw_status = FAIL_OUT_MEMORY;
> - goto out;
> - }
> - wait_for_completion(&completion);
> - if (fwControl->retcode > FLASH_UPDATE_IN_PROGRESS) {
> - pm8001_ha->fw_status = fwControl->retcode;
> - ret = -EFAULT;
> - goto out;
> - }
> + /* for the last chunk of data in case file
> + * size is not even with 4k, load only the rest
> + */

Please start multi-line comments with a line that has only "/*". It
would be good to add a blnak line before that too, for readability.

> + if (((loopcount-loopNumber) == 1) &&
> + ((partitionSize + HEADER_LEN) % IOCTL_BUF_SIZE)) {

While at it, align the conditions together to make this code more
readable. As is, it is really unpleasant to read :)

Also, "(partitionSize + HEADER_LEN) % IOCTL_BUF_SIZE" is calculated way
too many times. Using a local variable for the value would be nice.

> + fwControl->len =
> + (partitionSize + HEADER_LEN) %
> + IOCTL_BUF_SIZE;
> + memcpy((u8 *)fwControl->buffer,
> + (u8 *)pm8001_ha->fw_image->data + sizeRead,
> + (partitionSize + HEADER_LEN) %
> + IOCTL_BUF_SIZE);
> + sizeRead +=
> + (partitionSize + HEADER_LEN) %
> + IOCTL_BUF_SIZE;
> + } else {
> + memcpy((u8 *)fwControl->buffer,
> + (u8 *)pm8001_ha->fw_image->data + sizeRead,
> + IOCTL_BUF_SIZE);
> + sizeRead += IOCTL_BUF_SIZE;
> + }
> +
> + pm8001_ha->nvmd_completion = &completion;
> + ret = PM8001_CHIP_DISP->fw_flash_update_req(pm8001_ha,
> + payload);
> + if (ret) {
> + pm8001_ha->fw_status = FAIL_OUT_MEMORY;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + wait_for_completion(&completion);
> + if (fwControl->retcode > FLASH_UPDATE_IN_PROGRESS) {
> + pm8001_ha->fw_status = fwControl->retcode;
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> + goto out;
> + }
> }
> }
> out:


--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research