2021-08-23 09:33:22

by Alexander Dahl

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Enable HSIC Host Port on Atmel/Microchip SAMA5D2

Hello,

for a new embedded board featuring a Microchip SAMA5D2 SoC (64 MiB SiP variant
SAMA5D27C-D5M) we connected the third USB host port (HSIC only) with an
USB3503 hub chip. This doesn't work out of the box with the Linux kernel
currently, because neither the SoC nor the kernel does enable the HSIC
interface by default.

That SoC has three USB host ports, from the SAMA5D2 Series Datasheet [1] I
learned there's a flag in an EHCI register, which has to be set to enable the
HSIC interface on port C, the third port. (Section "41.7.14 EHCI: REG08 - HSIC
Enable/Disable" of the datasheet.) I suppose that register is vendor specific.
The register definitions in '/include/linux/usb/ehci_def.h' do not contain
that register.

Where would I add that register definition and set that flag in the kernel
then? I suppose in the vendor specific ehci driver?
That would be 'drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.c' right?

Since that feature is optional (other boards don't need to turn on hsic on
that port), some driver specific new device tree binding would be necessary,
right? I suppose that would have to be documented in 'Documentation/
devicetree/bindings/usb/atmel-usb.txt' right? (Or that would have to be
converted to yaml first?)

Is this the right track? If yes, I'm going to develop patches for this.
Otherwise any hint into the right direction are highly appreciated.

FWIW, I'm not the first one struggling [2] with this problem. ;-)

Greets
Alex

[1] https://www.microchip.com/en-us/product/ATSAMA5D27C-D5M#document-table
[2] https://community.atmel.com/forum/sama5d2-using-hsic-under-linux




2021-08-23 14:03:47

by Alan Stern

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: Enable HSIC Host Port on Atmel/Microchip SAMA5D2

On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:24:35AM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> Hello,
>
> for a new embedded board featuring a Microchip SAMA5D2 SoC (64 MiB SiP variant
> SAMA5D27C-D5M) we connected the third USB host port (HSIC only) with an
> USB3503 hub chip. This doesn't work out of the box with the Linux kernel
> currently, because neither the SoC nor the kernel does enable the HSIC
> interface by default.
>
> That SoC has three USB host ports, from the SAMA5D2 Series Datasheet [1] I
> learned there's a flag in an EHCI register, which has to be set to enable the
> HSIC interface on port C, the third port. (Section "41.7.14 EHCI: REG08 - HSIC
> Enable/Disable" of the datasheet.) I suppose that register is vendor specific.
> The register definitions in '/include/linux/usb/ehci_def.h' do not contain
> that register.
>
> Where would I add that register definition and set that flag in the kernel
> then? I suppose in the vendor specific ehci driver?
> That would be 'drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.c' right?

That is where you would set the flag. You might want to put the
register definition in ehci_def.h, with the other definitions.

> Since that feature is optional (other boards don't need to turn on hsic on
> that port), some driver specific new device tree binding would be necessary,
> right? I suppose that would have to be documented in 'Documentation/
> devicetree/bindings/usb/atmel-usb.txt' right? (Or that would have to be
> converted to yaml first?)

Yes, it would have to go into the device tree data somehow. I don't
know the best way to do this; people who know more about DT may be able
to tell you.

> Is this the right track? If yes, I'm going to develop patches for this.
> Otherwise any hint into the right direction are highly appreciated.

Yes, this is the right approach.

Alan Stern

> FWIW, I'm not the first one struggling [2] with this problem. ;-)
>
> Greets
> Alex
>
> [1] https://www.microchip.com/en-us/product/ATSAMA5D27C-D5M#document-table
> [2] https://community.atmel.com/forum/sama5d2-using-hsic-under-linux

2021-08-24 06:40:36

by Alexander Dahl

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFC PATCH] USB: host: ehci-atmel: Allow enabling HSIC on SAMA5D2

Unlike other SoC series featuring the 'atmel,at91sam9g45-ehci' USB EHCI
controller, which have embedded USB high-speed transceivers for each
port, the third port on the SAMA5D2 series is HSIC only. That HSIC
interface is not enabled after a power-on reset, but can be enabled by
setting a flag in a vendor specific EHCI register.

The register offsets added to the new header file were compared with
those for the SAM9G45, SAM9X25, SAMA5D3, SAMA5D4, and SAM9X60 series and
there are no differences in the offsets or contents of those registers.
Which of those additional vendor specific registers are supported,
differs by SoC family. So while the HSIC enable feature is currently
only present for SAMA5D2, it probably does not hurt to set it on the
other families, hence no additional check for SoC family here.

Tested on a custom board featuring a SAMA5D27C-D5M SiP connected to an
USB3503 hub with an upstream HSIC interface.

Link: https://community.atmel.com/forum/sama5d2-using-hsic-under-linux
Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <[email protected]>
---

Notes:
- for introducing new dt binding, would be nice to convert old one
first, probably needs split up and multiple iteration review?
- name of that new dt property?
- register definitions put to a separate file, like
'drivers/usb/host/ehci-fsl.h'
- unsure where exactly in the probe process that register write should
happen, datasheet gives no hint
- should suspend/resume be considered?

drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.h

diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.c
index e893467d659c..f8d9e686c082 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#include <linux/usb/hcd.h>

#include "ehci.h"
+#include "ehci-atmel.h"

#define DRIVER_DESC "EHCI Atmel driver"

@@ -85,6 +86,7 @@ static void atmel_stop_ehci(struct platform_device *pdev)

static int ehci_atmel_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
+ struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
struct usb_hcd *hcd;
const struct hc_driver *driver = &ehci_atmel_hc_driver;
struct resource *res;
@@ -149,6 +151,14 @@ static int ehci_atmel_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

atmel_start_ehci(pdev);

+ if (of_property_read_bool(np, "atmel,enable-hsic")) {
+ u32 tmp;
+
+ tmp = ehci_readl(ehci, hcd->regs + AT91_UHPHS_INSNREG08);
+ tmp |= AT91_UHPHS_HSIC_EN;
+ ehci_writel(ehci, tmp, hcd->regs + AT91_UHPHS_INSNREG08);
+ }
+
retval = usb_add_hcd(hcd, irq, IRQF_SHARED);
if (retval)
goto fail_add_hcd;
@@ -170,10 +180,17 @@ static int ehci_atmel_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
static int ehci_atmel_drv_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct usb_hcd *hcd = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ struct ehci_hcd *ehci;
+ u32 tmp;

usb_remove_hcd(hcd);
usb_put_hcd(hcd);

+ ehci = hcd_to_ehci(hcd);
+ tmp = ehci_readl(ehci, hcd->regs + AT91_UHPHS_INSNREG08);
+ tmp &= ~AT91_UHPHS_HSIC_EN;
+ ehci_writel(ehci, tmp, hcd->regs + AT91_UHPHS_INSNREG08);
+
atmel_stop_ehci(pdev);

return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.h b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..4c4998c2a6dd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.h
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * Vendor specific definitions for EHCI on Atmel/Microchip SoCs.
+ *
+ * © 2021 Alexander Dahl <[email protected]>
+ */
+#ifndef EHCI_ATMEL_H
+#define EHCI_ATMEL_H
+
+/* device specific register offsets, taken from SAMA5D2 datasheet */
+
+#define AT91_UHPHS_INSNREG06 0xA8 /* AHB Error Status Register */
+
+#define AT91_UHPHS_INSNREG07 0xAC /* AHB Master Error Address Register */
+
+#define AT91_UHPHS_INSNREG08 0xB0 /* HSIC Enable/Disable Register */
+#define AT91_UHPHS_HSIC_EN (1 << 2) /* HSIC Enable/Disable */
+
+#endif /* ECHI_ATMEL_H */

base-commit: e22ce8eb631bdc47a4a4ea7ecf4e4ba499db4f93
--
2.30.2

2021-08-24 06:48:07

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] USB: host: ehci-atmel: Allow enabling HSIC on SAMA5D2

On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 08:37:02AM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> Unlike other SoC series featuring the 'atmel,at91sam9g45-ehci' USB EHCI
> controller, which have embedded USB high-speed transceivers for each
> port, the third port on the SAMA5D2 series is HSIC only. That HSIC
> interface is not enabled after a power-on reset, but can be enabled by
> setting a flag in a vendor specific EHCI register.
>
> The register offsets added to the new header file were compared with
> those for the SAM9G45, SAM9X25, SAMA5D3, SAMA5D4, and SAM9X60 series and
> there are no differences in the offsets or contents of those registers.
> Which of those additional vendor specific registers are supported,
> differs by SoC family. So while the HSIC enable feature is currently
> only present for SAMA5D2, it probably does not hurt to set it on the
> other families, hence no additional check for SoC family here.
>
> Tested on a custom board featuring a SAMA5D27C-D5M SiP connected to an
> USB3503 hub with an upstream HSIC interface.
>
> Link: https://community.atmel.com/forum/sama5d2-using-hsic-under-linux
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> - for introducing new dt binding, would be nice to convert old one
> first, probably needs split up and multiple iteration review?
> - name of that new dt property?
> - register definitions put to a separate file, like
> 'drivers/usb/host/ehci-fsl.h'
> - unsure where exactly in the probe process that register write should
> happen, datasheet gives no hint
> - should suspend/resume be considered?
>
> drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++

No need for a new .h file that is only used in a single .c file. Just
put those few lines in the .c file please.

thanks,

greg k-h

2021-09-02 15:40:54

by Nicolas Ferre

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] USB: host: ehci-atmel: Allow enabling HSIC on SAMA5D2

Hi Alexander,

On 24/08/2021 at 08:37, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> Unlike other SoC series featuring the 'atmel,at91sam9g45-ehci' USB EHCI
> controller, which have embedded USB high-speed transceivers for each
> port, the third port on the SAMA5D2 series is HSIC only. That HSIC
> interface is not enabled after a power-on reset, but can be enabled by
> setting a flag in a vendor specific EHCI register.
>
> The register offsets added to the new header file were compared with
> those for the SAM9G45, SAM9X25, SAMA5D3, SAMA5D4, and SAM9X60 series and
> there are no differences in the offsets or contents of those registers.
> Which of those additional vendor specific registers are supported,
> differs by SoC family. So while the HSIC enable feature is currently
> only present for SAMA5D2, it probably does not hurt to set it on the
> other families, hence no additional check for SoC family here.
>
> Tested on a custom board featuring a SAMA5D27C-D5M SiP connected to an
> USB3503 hub with an upstream HSIC interface.
>
> Link: https://community.atmel.com/forum/sama5d2-using-hsic-under-linux
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <[email protected]>

Sorry for not having coming back to you earlier, summertime...

What you are looking for is what Cristian developed in our "vendor tree"
and that needs to be "Mainlined":
https://github.com/linux4sam/linux-at91/commit/ca368f544899c14b03df9ce7510684f03acf1bf9

It allows us to have a gigabit Ethernet HSIC connected on our sama5d2
ICP board. It works well for some time.

For DT, we rely on the standard "phy_type" property set to "hsic" as
highlighted in this DT node on the ICP board precisely:
https://github.com/linux4sam/linux-at91/blob/master/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sama5d2_icp.dts#L766

This way we can use the of_usb_get_phy_mode() standard function:
https://github.com/linux4sam/linux-at91/blob/master/drivers/usb/phy/of.c#L28

All this tells me that I would prefer Cristi's approach. If agreed,
we'll make sure to make progress on the mainlining part soon.

Hope that it helps. Best regards,
Nicolas

> ---
>
> Notes:
> - for introducing new dt binding, would be nice to convert old one
> first, probably needs split up and multiple iteration review?
> - name of that new dt property?
> - register definitions put to a separate file, like
> 'drivers/usb/host/ehci-fsl.h'
> - unsure where exactly in the probe process that register write should
> happen, datasheet gives no hint
> - should suspend/resume be considered?
>
> drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.c
> index e893467d659c..f8d9e686c082 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #include <linux/usb/hcd.h>
>
> #include "ehci.h"
> +#include "ehci-atmel.h"
>
> #define DRIVER_DESC "EHCI Atmel driver"
>
> @@ -85,6 +86,7 @@ static void atmel_stop_ehci(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> static int ehci_atmel_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> struct usb_hcd *hcd;
> const struct hc_driver *driver = &ehci_atmel_hc_driver;
> struct resource *res;
> @@ -149,6 +151,14 @@ static int ehci_atmel_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> atmel_start_ehci(pdev);
>
> + if (of_property_read_bool(np, "atmel,enable-hsic")) {
> + u32 tmp;
> +
> + tmp = ehci_readl(ehci, hcd->regs + AT91_UHPHS_INSNREG08);
> + tmp |= AT91_UHPHS_HSIC_EN;
> + ehci_writel(ehci, tmp, hcd->regs + AT91_UHPHS_INSNREG08);
> + }
> +
> retval = usb_add_hcd(hcd, irq, IRQF_SHARED);
> if (retval)
> goto fail_add_hcd;
> @@ -170,10 +180,17 @@ static int ehci_atmel_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> static int ehci_atmel_drv_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct usb_hcd *hcd = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + struct ehci_hcd *ehci;
> + u32 tmp;
>
> usb_remove_hcd(hcd);
> usb_put_hcd(hcd);
>
> + ehci = hcd_to_ehci(hcd);
> + tmp = ehci_readl(ehci, hcd->regs + AT91_UHPHS_INSNREG08);
> + tmp &= ~AT91_UHPHS_HSIC_EN;
> + ehci_writel(ehci, tmp, hcd->regs + AT91_UHPHS_INSNREG08);
> +
> atmel_stop_ehci(pdev);
>
> return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.h b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..4c4998c2a6dd
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * Vendor specific definitions for EHCI on Atmel/Microchip SoCs.
> + *
> + * © 2021 Alexander Dahl <[email protected]>
> + */
> +#ifndef EHCI_ATMEL_H
> +#define EHCI_ATMEL_H
> +
> +/* device specific register offsets, taken from SAMA5D2 datasheet */
> +
> +#define AT91_UHPHS_INSNREG06 0xA8 /* AHB Error Status Register */
> +
> +#define AT91_UHPHS_INSNREG07 0xAC /* AHB Master Error Address Register */
> +
> +#define AT91_UHPHS_INSNREG08 0xB0 /* HSIC Enable/Disable Register */
> +#define AT91_UHPHS_HSIC_EN (1 << 2) /* HSIC Enable/Disable */
> +
> +#endif /* ECHI_ATMEL_H */
>
> base-commit: e22ce8eb631bdc47a4a4ea7ecf4e4ba499db4f93
> --
> 2.30.2
>


--
Nicolas Ferre

2021-09-06 07:27:02

by Alexander Dahl

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] USB: host: ehci-atmel: Allow enabling HSIC on SAMA5D2

Hello Nicolas,

Am Donnerstag, 2. September 2021, 17:33:50 CEST schrieb Nicolas Ferre:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> On 24/08/2021 at 08:37, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> > Unlike other SoC series featuring the 'atmel,at91sam9g45-ehci' USB EHCI
> > controller, which have embedded USB high-speed transceivers for each
> > port, the third port on the SAMA5D2 series is HSIC only. That HSIC
> > interface is not enabled after a power-on reset, but can be enabled by
> > setting a flag in a vendor specific EHCI register.
> >
> > The register offsets added to the new header file were compared with
> > those for the SAM9G45, SAM9X25, SAMA5D3, SAMA5D4, and SAM9X60 series and
> > there are no differences in the offsets or contents of those registers.
> > Which of those additional vendor specific registers are supported,
> > differs by SoC family. So while the HSIC enable feature is currently
> > only present for SAMA5D2, it probably does not hurt to set it on the
> > other families, hence no additional check for SoC family here.
> >
> > Tested on a custom board featuring a SAMA5D27C-D5M SiP connected to an
> > USB3503 hub with an upstream HSIC interface.
> >
> > Link: https://community.atmel.com/forum/sama5d2-using-hsic-under-linux
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <[email protected]>
>
> Sorry for not having coming back to you earlier, summertime...

I had one week off last week due to a mild infection myself, so we just
proceed here and now. (-:

> What you are looking for is what Cristian developed in our "vendor tree"
> and that needs to be "Mainlined":
> https://github.com/linux4sam/linux-at91/commit/ca368f544899c14b03df9ce751068
> 4f03acf1bf9

Looks like it does what it should from quick code inspection. One could
nitpick some things, maybe I add some comments on GitHub.

> It allows us to have a gigabit Ethernet HSIC connected on our sama5d2
> ICP board. It works well for some time.

Good to hear.

> For DT, we rely on the standard "phy_type" property set to "hsic" as
> highlighted in this DT node on the ICP board precisely:
> https://github.com/linux4sam/linux-at91/blob/master/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-s
> ama5d2_icp.dts#L766
>
> This way we can use the of_usb_get_phy_mode() standard function:
> https://github.com/linux4sam/linux-at91/blob/master/drivers/usb/phy/of.c#L28

I noticed that phy_type property, but did not follow that approach, because
that USB block in SAMA5D2 has three ports, where one (A) is shared with a
device port, two (A and B) have embedded transceivers, and only the third (C)
has that HSIC interface, but nothing else. So the flag has no effect on port A
and B anyways, and I would have found it misleading to set phy_type to HSIC
for the whole USB block.

> All this tells me that I would prefer Cristi's approach. If agreed,
> we'll make sure to make progress on the mainlining part soon.

I don't mind. If that's your preferred approach, I will happily test it. Was
the series already posted to upstream?

> Hope that it helps. Best regards,
> Nicolas

Yes, indeed. Thanks for your feedback.

Greets
Alex

>
> > ---
> >
> > Notes:
> > - for introducing new dt binding, would be nice to convert old one
> >
> > first, probably needs split up and multiple iteration review?
> >
> > - name of that new dt property?
> > - register definitions put to a separate file, like
> >
> > 'drivers/usb/host/ehci-fsl.h'
> >
> > - unsure where exactly in the probe process that register write
> > should
> >
> > happen, datasheet gives no hint
> >
> > - should suspend/resume be considered?
> >
> > drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.h
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.c
> > index e893467d659c..f8d9e686c082 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.c
> > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> >
> > #include <linux/usb/hcd.h>
> >
> > #include "ehci.h"
> >
> > +#include "ehci-atmel.h"
> >
> > #define DRIVER_DESC "EHCI Atmel driver"
> >
> > @@ -85,6 +86,7 @@ static void atmel_stop_ehci(struct platform_device
> > *pdev)
> >
> > static int ehci_atmel_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> >
> > + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> >
> > struct usb_hcd *hcd;
> > const struct hc_driver *driver = &ehci_atmel_hc_driver;
> > struct resource *res;
> >
> > @@ -149,6 +151,14 @@ static int ehci_atmel_drv_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)>
> > atmel_start_ehci(pdev);
> >
> > + if (of_property_read_bool(np, "atmel,enable-hsic")) {
> > + u32 tmp;
> > +
> > + tmp = ehci_readl(ehci, hcd->regs + AT91_UHPHS_INSNREG08);
> > + tmp |= AT91_UHPHS_HSIC_EN;
> > + ehci_writel(ehci, tmp, hcd->regs + AT91_UHPHS_INSNREG08);
> > + }
> > +
> >
> > retval = usb_add_hcd(hcd, irq, IRQF_SHARED);
> > if (retval)
> >
> > goto fail_add_hcd;
> >
> > @@ -170,10 +180,17 @@ static int ehci_atmel_drv_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)>
> > static int ehci_atmel_drv_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> >
> > struct usb_hcd *hcd = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >
> > + struct ehci_hcd *ehci;
> > + u32 tmp;
> >
> > usb_remove_hcd(hcd);
> > usb_put_hcd(hcd);
> >
> > + ehci = hcd_to_ehci(hcd);
> > + tmp = ehci_readl(ehci, hcd->regs + AT91_UHPHS_INSNREG08);
> > + tmp &= ~AT91_UHPHS_HSIC_EN;
> > + ehci_writel(ehci, tmp, hcd->regs + AT91_UHPHS_INSNREG08);
> > +
> >
> > atmel_stop_ehci(pdev);
> >
> > return 0;
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.h b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..4c4998c2a6dd
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > +/*
> > + * Vendor specific definitions for EHCI on Atmel/Microchip SoCs.
> > + *
> > + * ? 2021 Alexander Dahl <[email protected]>
> > + */
> > +#ifndef EHCI_ATMEL_H
> > +#define EHCI_ATMEL_H
> > +
> > +/* device specific register offsets, taken from SAMA5D2 datasheet */
> > +
> > +#define AT91_UHPHS_INSNREG06 0xA8 /* AHB Error Status Register
> > */ +
> > +#define AT91_UHPHS_INSNREG07 0xAC /* AHB Master Error Address
> > Register */ +
> > +#define AT91_UHPHS_INSNREG08 0xB0 /* HSIC Enable/Disable
> > Register */ +#define AT91_UHPHS_HSIC_EN (1 << 2) /* HSIC
> > Enable/Disable */ +
> > +#endif /* ECHI_ATMEL_H */
> >
> > base-commit: e22ce8eb631bdc47a4a4ea7ecf4e4ba499db4f93
> > --
> > 2.30.2


--