2022-05-28 19:19:43

by Maciej Fijalkowski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: xdp: Directly use ida_alloc()/free()

On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 06:46:09AM +0000, keliu wrote:
> Use ida_alloc()/ida_free() instead of deprecated
> ida_simple_get()/ida_simple_remove() .
>
> Signed-off-by: keliu <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <[email protected]>

For future AF_XDP related patches please specify the bpf-next tree in the
patch subject (or bpf if it's a fix).

Thanks!

> ---
> net/xdp/xdp_umem.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c b/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c
> index f01ef6bda390..869b9b9b9fad 100644
> --- a/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c
> +++ b/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static int xdp_umem_addr_map(struct xdp_umem *umem, struct page **pages,
> static void xdp_umem_release(struct xdp_umem *umem)
> {
> umem->zc = false;
> - ida_simple_remove(&umem_ida, umem->id);
> + ida_free(&umem_ida, umem->id);
>
> xdp_umem_addr_unmap(umem);
> xdp_umem_unpin_pages(umem);
> @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ struct xdp_umem *xdp_umem_create(struct xdp_umem_reg *mr)
> if (!umem)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> - err = ida_simple_get(&umem_ida, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> + err = ida_alloc(&umem_ida, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (err < 0) {
> kfree(umem);
> return ERR_PTR(err);
> @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ struct xdp_umem *xdp_umem_create(struct xdp_umem_reg *mr)
>
> err = xdp_umem_reg(umem, mr);
> if (err) {
> - ida_simple_remove(&umem_ida, umem->id);
> + ida_free(&umem_ida, umem->id);
> kfree(umem);
> return ERR_PTR(err);
> }
> --
> 2.25.1
>


2022-05-28 19:21:49

by Jesper Dangaard Brouer

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: xdp: Directly use ida_alloc()/free()



On 27/05/2022 19.08, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 06:46:09AM +0000, keliu wrote:
>> Use ida_alloc()/ida_free() instead of deprecated
>> ida_simple_get()/ida_simple_remove() .
>>
>> Signed-off-by: keliu <[email protected]>

Could you use your full name with capital letters?

>
> Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <[email protected]>
>
> For future AF_XDP related patches please specify the bpf-next tree in the
> patch subject (or bpf if it's a fix).

I agree.

Could you also take care of net/core/xdp.c ?

Patch LGTM

Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <[email protected]>


>> ---
>> net/xdp/xdp_umem.c | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c b/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c
>> index f01ef6bda390..869b9b9b9fad 100644
>> --- a/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c
>> +++ b/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c
>> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static int xdp_umem_addr_map(struct xdp_umem *umem, struct page **pages,
>> static void xdp_umem_release(struct xdp_umem *umem)
>> {
>> umem->zc = false;
>> - ida_simple_remove(&umem_ida, umem->id);
>> + ida_free(&umem_ida, umem->id);
>>
>> xdp_umem_addr_unmap(umem);
>> xdp_umem_unpin_pages(umem);
>> @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ struct xdp_umem *xdp_umem_create(struct xdp_umem_reg *mr)
>> if (!umem)
>> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>
>> - err = ida_simple_get(&umem_ida, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + err = ida_alloc(&umem_ida, GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (err < 0) {
>> kfree(umem);
>> return ERR_PTR(err);
>> @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ struct xdp_umem *xdp_umem_create(struct xdp_umem_reg *mr)
>>
>> err = xdp_umem_reg(umem, mr);
>> if (err) {
>> - ida_simple_remove(&umem_ida, umem->id);
>> + ida_free(&umem_ida, umem->id);
>> kfree(umem);
>> return ERR_PTR(err);
>> }
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
>