2019-07-08 08:44:46

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] opp: Return genpd virtual devices from dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd()

The cpufreq drivers don't need to do runtime PM operations on the
virtual devices returned by dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name() and so the
virtual devices weren't shared with the callers of
dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd() earlier.

But the IO device drivers would want to do that. This patch updates the
prototype of dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd() to accept another argument to
return the pointer to the array of genpd virtual devices.

Reported-by: Rajendra Nayak <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
---
@Rajendra: Can you please test this one ? I have only compile tested it.

drivers/opp/core.c | 5 ++++-
include/linux/pm_opp.h | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/opp/core.c b/drivers/opp/core.c
index 2958cc7bbb58..07b6f1187b3b 100644
--- a/drivers/opp/core.c
+++ b/drivers/opp/core.c
@@ -1775,6 +1775,7 @@ static void _opp_detach_genpd(struct opp_table *opp_table)
* dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd - Attach genpd(s) for the device and save virtual device pointer
* @dev: Consumer device for which the genpd is getting attached.
* @names: Null terminated array of pointers containing names of genpd to attach.
+ * @virt_devs: Pointer to return the array of virtual devices.
*
* Multiple generic power domains for a device are supported with the help of
* virtual genpd devices, which are created for each consumer device - genpd
@@ -1789,7 +1790,8 @@ static void _opp_detach_genpd(struct opp_table *opp_table)
* This helper needs to be called once with a list of all genpd to attach.
* Otherwise the original device structure will be used instead by the OPP core.
*/
-struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev, const char **names)
+struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev,
+ const char **names, struct device ***virt_devs)
{
struct opp_table *opp_table;
struct device *virt_dev;
@@ -1850,6 +1852,7 @@ struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev, const char **names
name++;
}

+ *virt_devs = opp_table->genpd_virt_devs;
mutex_unlock(&opp_table->genpd_virt_dev_lock);

return opp_table;
diff --git a/include/linux/pm_opp.h b/include/linux/pm_opp.h
index be570761b77a..7c2fe2952f40 100644
--- a/include/linux/pm_opp.h
+++ b/include/linux/pm_opp.h
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_set_clkname(struct device *dev, const char * name);
void dev_pm_opp_put_clkname(struct opp_table *opp_table);
struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_register_set_opp_helper(struct device *dev, int (*set_opp)(struct dev_pm_set_opp_data *data));
void dev_pm_opp_unregister_set_opp_helper(struct opp_table *opp_table);
-struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev, const char **names);
+struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev, const char **names, struct device ***virt_devs);
void dev_pm_opp_detach_genpd(struct opp_table *opp_table);
int dev_pm_opp_xlate_performance_state(struct opp_table *src_table, struct opp_table *dst_table, unsigned int pstate);
int dev_pm_opp_set_rate(struct device *dev, unsigned long target_freq);
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static inline struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_set_clkname(struct device *dev, const

static inline void dev_pm_opp_put_clkname(struct opp_table *opp_table) {}

-static inline struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev, const char **names)
+static inline struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev, const char **names, struct device ***virt_devs)
{
return ERR_PTR(-ENOTSUPP);
}
--
2.21.0.rc0.269.g1a574e7a288b


2019-07-11 09:41:10

by Rajendra Nayak

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] opp: Return genpd virtual devices from dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd()


On 7/8/2019 11:30 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The cpufreq drivers don't need to do runtime PM operations on the
> virtual devices returned by dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name() and so the
> virtual devices weren't shared with the callers of
> dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd() earlier.
>
> But the IO device drivers would want to do that. This patch updates the
> prototype of dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd() to accept another argument to
> return the pointer to the array of genpd virtual devices.
>
> Reported-by: Rajendra Nayak <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
> ---
> @Rajendra: Can you please test this one ? I have only compile tested it.

Sorry for the delay, I seem to have completely missed this patch.
I just gave this a try and here are some observations,

I have a case where I have one device with 2 power domains, one of them
is scale-able (supports perf state) and the other one supports only being
turned on and off.

1. In the driver I now need to use dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name/id to attach the
power domain which supports only on/off and then use dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd()
for the one which supports perf states.

2. My OPP table has only 1 required_opps, so the required_opp_count for the OPP table is 1.
Now if my device tree has my scale-able powerdomain at index 1 (it works if its at index 0)
then I end up with this error

[ 2.858628] ufshcd-qcom 1d84000.ufshc: Index can't be greater than required-opp-count - 1, rpmh_pd (1 : 1)

so it looks like a lot of the OPP core today just assumes that if a device has multiple power domains,
all of them are scale-able which isn't necessarily true.

>
> drivers/opp/core.c | 5 ++++-
> include/linux/pm_opp.h | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/opp/core.c b/drivers/opp/core.c
> index 2958cc7bbb58..07b6f1187b3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/opp/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/opp/core.c
> @@ -1775,6 +1775,7 @@ static void _opp_detach_genpd(struct opp_table *opp_table)
> * dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd - Attach genpd(s) for the device and save virtual device pointer
> * @dev: Consumer device for which the genpd is getting attached.
> * @names: Null terminated array of pointers containing names of genpd to attach.
> + * @virt_devs: Pointer to return the array of virtual devices.
> *
> * Multiple generic power domains for a device are supported with the help of
> * virtual genpd devices, which are created for each consumer device - genpd
> @@ -1789,7 +1790,8 @@ static void _opp_detach_genpd(struct opp_table *opp_table)
> * This helper needs to be called once with a list of all genpd to attach.
> * Otherwise the original device structure will be used instead by the OPP core.
> */
> -struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev, const char **names)
> +struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev,
> + const char **names, struct device ***virt_devs)
> {
> struct opp_table *opp_table;
> struct device *virt_dev;
> @@ -1850,6 +1852,7 @@ struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev, const char **names
> name++;
> }
>
> + *virt_devs = opp_table->genpd_virt_devs;
> mutex_unlock(&opp_table->genpd_virt_dev_lock);
>
> return opp_table;
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm_opp.h b/include/linux/pm_opp.h
> index be570761b77a..7c2fe2952f40 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm_opp.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm_opp.h
> @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_set_clkname(struct device *dev, const char * name);
> void dev_pm_opp_put_clkname(struct opp_table *opp_table);
> struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_register_set_opp_helper(struct device *dev, int (*set_opp)(struct dev_pm_set_opp_data *data));
> void dev_pm_opp_unregister_set_opp_helper(struct opp_table *opp_table);
> -struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev, const char **names);
> +struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev, const char **names, struct device ***virt_devs);
> void dev_pm_opp_detach_genpd(struct opp_table *opp_table);
> int dev_pm_opp_xlate_performance_state(struct opp_table *src_table, struct opp_table *dst_table, unsigned int pstate);
> int dev_pm_opp_set_rate(struct device *dev, unsigned long target_freq);
> @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static inline struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_set_clkname(struct device *dev, const
>
> static inline void dev_pm_opp_put_clkname(struct opp_table *opp_table) {}
>
> -static inline struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev, const char **names)
> +static inline struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev, const char **names, struct device ***virt_devs)
> {
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOTSUPP);
> }
>

--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

2019-07-16 10:45:26

by Niklas Cassel

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] opp: Return genpd virtual devices from dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd()

On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 11:30:11AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The cpufreq drivers don't need to do runtime PM operations on the
> virtual devices returned by dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name() and so the
> virtual devices weren't shared with the callers of
> dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd() earlier.
>
> But the IO device drivers would want to do that. This patch updates the
> prototype of dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd() to accept another argument to
> return the pointer to the array of genpd virtual devices.
>
> Reported-by: Rajendra Nayak <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
> ---
> @Rajendra: Can you please test this one ? I have only compile tested it.
>
> drivers/opp/core.c | 5 ++++-
> include/linux/pm_opp.h | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/opp/core.c b/drivers/opp/core.c
> index 2958cc7bbb58..07b6f1187b3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/opp/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/opp/core.c
> @@ -1775,6 +1775,7 @@ static void _opp_detach_genpd(struct opp_table *opp_table)
> * dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd - Attach genpd(s) for the device and save virtual device pointer
> * @dev: Consumer device for which the genpd is getting attached.
> * @names: Null terminated array of pointers containing names of genpd to attach.
> + * @virt_devs: Pointer to return the array of virtual devices.
> *
> * Multiple generic power domains for a device are supported with the help of
> * virtual genpd devices, which are created for each consumer device - genpd
> @@ -1789,7 +1790,8 @@ static void _opp_detach_genpd(struct opp_table *opp_table)
> * This helper needs to be called once with a list of all genpd to attach.
> * Otherwise the original device structure will be used instead by the OPP core.
> */
> -struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev, const char **names)
> +struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev,
> + const char **names, struct device ***virt_devs)
> {
> struct opp_table *opp_table;
> struct device *virt_dev;
> @@ -1850,6 +1852,7 @@ struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev, const char **names
> name++;
> }
>
> + *virt_devs = opp_table->genpd_virt_devs;

Could we perhaps only do this if (virt_devs), that way callers can send in
NULL if they don't care about the genpd virtual devices.

Kind regards,
Niklas

> mutex_unlock(&opp_table->genpd_virt_dev_lock);
>
> return opp_table;
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm_opp.h b/include/linux/pm_opp.h
> index be570761b77a..7c2fe2952f40 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm_opp.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm_opp.h
> @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_set_clkname(struct device *dev, const char * name);
> void dev_pm_opp_put_clkname(struct opp_table *opp_table);
> struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_register_set_opp_helper(struct device *dev, int (*set_opp)(struct dev_pm_set_opp_data *data));
> void dev_pm_opp_unregister_set_opp_helper(struct opp_table *opp_table);
> -struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev, const char **names);
> +struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev, const char **names, struct device ***virt_devs);
> void dev_pm_opp_detach_genpd(struct opp_table *opp_table);
> int dev_pm_opp_xlate_performance_state(struct opp_table *src_table, struct opp_table *dst_table, unsigned int pstate);
> int dev_pm_opp_set_rate(struct device *dev, unsigned long target_freq);
> @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static inline struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_set_clkname(struct device *dev, const
>
> static inline void dev_pm_opp_put_clkname(struct opp_table *opp_table) {}
>
> -static inline struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev, const char **names)
> +static inline struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev, const char **names, struct device ***virt_devs)
> {
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOTSUPP);
> }
> --
> 2.21.0.rc0.269.g1a574e7a288b
>

2019-07-17 02:53:00

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] opp: Return genpd virtual devices from dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd()

On 16-07-19, 12:43, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 11:30:11AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > The cpufreq drivers don't need to do runtime PM operations on the
> > virtual devices returned by dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name() and so the
> > virtual devices weren't shared with the callers of
> > dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd() earlier.
> >
> > But the IO device drivers would want to do that. This patch updates the
> > prototype of dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd() to accept another argument to
> > return the pointer to the array of genpd virtual devices.
> >
> > Reported-by: Rajendra Nayak <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > @Rajendra: Can you please test this one ? I have only compile tested it.
> >
> > drivers/opp/core.c | 5 ++++-
> > include/linux/pm_opp.h | 4 ++--
> > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/opp/core.c b/drivers/opp/core.c
> > index 2958cc7bbb58..07b6f1187b3b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/opp/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/opp/core.c
> > @@ -1775,6 +1775,7 @@ static void _opp_detach_genpd(struct opp_table *opp_table)
> > * dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd - Attach genpd(s) for the device and save virtual device pointer
> > * @dev: Consumer device for which the genpd is getting attached.
> > * @names: Null terminated array of pointers containing names of genpd to attach.
> > + * @virt_devs: Pointer to return the array of virtual devices.
> > *
> > * Multiple generic power domains for a device are supported with the help of
> > * virtual genpd devices, which are created for each consumer device - genpd
> > @@ -1789,7 +1790,8 @@ static void _opp_detach_genpd(struct opp_table *opp_table)
> > * This helper needs to be called once with a list of all genpd to attach.
> > * Otherwise the original device structure will be used instead by the OPP core.
> > */
> > -struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev, const char **names)
> > +struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev,
> > + const char **names, struct device ***virt_devs)
> > {
> > struct opp_table *opp_table;
> > struct device *virt_dev;
> > @@ -1850,6 +1852,7 @@ struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev, const char **names
> > name++;
> > }
> >
> > + *virt_devs = opp_table->genpd_virt_devs;
>
> Could we perhaps only do this if (virt_devs), that way callers can send in
> NULL if they don't care about the genpd virtual devices.

That was the idea and I failed to add it :(

--
viresh

2019-07-17 05:49:16

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] opp: Return genpd virtual devices from dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd()

On 11-07-19, 15:09, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> Sorry for the delay

Same here :)

> I seem to have completely missed this patch.
> I just gave this a try and here are some observations,
>
> I have a case where I have one device with 2 power domains, one of them
> is scale-able (supports perf state) and the other one supports only being
> turned on and off.
>
> 1. In the driver I now need to use dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name/id to attach the
> power domain which supports only on/off and then use dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd()
> for the one which supports perf states.
>
> 2. My OPP table has only 1 required_opps, so the required_opp_count for the OPP table is 1.
> Now if my device tree has my scale-able powerdomain at index 1 (it works if its at index 0)
> then I end up with this error
>
> [ 2.858628] ufshcd-qcom 1d84000.ufshc: Index can't be greater than required-opp-count - 1, rpmh_pd (1 : 1)
>
> so it looks like a lot of the OPP core today just assumes that if a device has multiple power domains,
> all of them are scale-able which isn't necessarily true.

I don't think a lot of OPP core has these problems, but maybe only
this place. I was taking care of this since the beginning just forgot
it now.

What about this over this commit:

diff --git a/drivers/opp/core.c b/drivers/opp/core.c
index d76ead4eff4c..1f11f8c92337 100644
--- a/drivers/opp/core.c
+++ b/drivers/opp/core.c
@@ -1789,13 +1789,16 @@ static void _opp_detach_genpd(struct opp_table *opp_table)
*
* This helper needs to be called once with a list of all genpd to attach.
* Otherwise the original device structure will be used instead by the OPP core.
+ *
+ * The order of entries in the names array must match the order in which
+ * "required-opps" are added in DT.
*/
struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev,
const char **names, struct device ***virt_devs)
{
struct opp_table *opp_table;
struct device *virt_dev;
- int index, ret = -EINVAL;
+ int index = 0, ret = -EINVAL;
const char **name = names;

opp_table = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table(dev);
@@ -1821,14 +1824,6 @@ struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev,
goto unlock;

while (*name) {
- index = of_property_match_string(dev->of_node,
- "power-domain-names", *name);
- if (index < 0) {
- dev_err(dev, "Failed to find power domain: %s (%d)\n",
- *name, index);
- goto err;
- }
-
if (index >= opp_table->required_opp_count) {
dev_err(dev, "Index can't be greater than required-opp-count - 1, %s (%d : %d)\n",
*name, opp_table->required_opp_count, index);
@@ -1849,6 +1844,7 @@ struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev,
}

opp_table->genpd_virt_devs[index] = virt_dev;
+ index++;
name++;
}


--
viresh

2019-07-17 10:05:25

by Rajendra Nayak

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] opp: Return genpd virtual devices from dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd()



On 7/17/2019 11:17 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 11-07-19, 15:09, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>> Sorry for the delay
>
> Same here :)
>
>> I seem to have completely missed this patch.
>> I just gave this a try and here are some observations,
>>
>> I have a case where I have one device with 2 power domains, one of them
>> is scale-able (supports perf state) and the other one supports only being
>> turned on and off.
>>
>> 1. In the driver I now need to use dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name/id to attach the
>> power domain which supports only on/off and then use dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd()
>> for the one which supports perf states.
>>
>> 2. My OPP table has only 1 required_opps, so the required_opp_count for the OPP table is 1.
>> Now if my device tree has my scale-able powerdomain at index 1 (it works if its at index 0)
>> then I end up with this error
>>
>> [ 2.858628] ufshcd-qcom 1d84000.ufshc: Index can't be greater than required-opp-count - 1, rpmh_pd (1 : 1)
>>
>> so it looks like a lot of the OPP core today just assumes that if a device has multiple power domains,
>> all of them are scale-able which isn't necessarily true.
>
> I don't think a lot of OPP core has these problems, but maybe only
> this place. I was taking care of this since the beginning just forgot
> it now.
>
> What about this over this commit:

Yes, this does seem to fix my concern mentioned in 2. above.

>
> diff --git a/drivers/opp/core.c b/drivers/opp/core.c
> index d76ead4eff4c..1f11f8c92337 100644
> --- a/drivers/opp/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/opp/core.c
> @@ -1789,13 +1789,16 @@ static void _opp_detach_genpd(struct opp_table *opp_table)
> *
> * This helper needs to be called once with a list of all genpd to attach.
> * Otherwise the original device structure will be used instead by the OPP core.
> + *
> + * The order of entries in the names array must match the order in which
> + * "required-opps" are added in DT.
> */
> struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev,
> const char **names, struct device ***virt_devs)
> {
> struct opp_table *opp_table;
> struct device *virt_dev;
> - int index, ret = -EINVAL;
> + int index = 0, ret = -EINVAL;
> const char **name = names;
>
> opp_table = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table(dev);
> @@ -1821,14 +1824,6 @@ struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev,
> goto unlock;
>
> while (*name) {
> - index = of_property_match_string(dev->of_node,
> - "power-domain-names", *name);
> - if (index < 0) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Failed to find power domain: %s (%d)\n",
> - *name, index);
> - goto err;
> - }
> -
> if (index >= opp_table->required_opp_count) {
> dev_err(dev, "Index can't be greater than required-opp-count - 1, %s (%d : %d)\n",
> *name, opp_table->required_opp_count, index);
> @@ -1849,6 +1844,7 @@ struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev,
> }
>
> opp_table->genpd_virt_devs[index] = virt_dev;
> + index++;
> name++;
> }
>
>

--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

2019-07-17 10:15:37

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] opp: Return genpd virtual devices from dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd()

On 17-07-19, 15:34, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>
>
> On 7/17/2019 11:17 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 11-07-19, 15:09, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> > > Sorry for the delay
> >
> > Same here :)
> >
> > > I seem to have completely missed this patch.
> > > I just gave this a try and here are some observations,
> > >
> > > I have a case where I have one device with 2 power domains, one of them
> > > is scale-able (supports perf state) and the other one supports only being
> > > turned on and off.
> > >
> > > 1. In the driver I now need to use dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name/id to attach the
> > > power domain which supports only on/off and then use dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd()
> > > for the one which supports perf states.
> > >
> > > 2. My OPP table has only 1 required_opps, so the required_opp_count for the OPP table is 1.
> > > Now if my device tree has my scale-able powerdomain at index 1 (it works if its at index 0)
> > > then I end up with this error
> > >
> > > [ 2.858628] ufshcd-qcom 1d84000.ufshc: Index can't be greater than required-opp-count - 1, rpmh_pd (1 : 1)
> > >
> > > so it looks like a lot of the OPP core today just assumes that if a device has multiple power domains,
> > > all of them are scale-able which isn't necessarily true.
> >
> > I don't think a lot of OPP core has these problems, but maybe only
> > this place. I was taking care of this since the beginning just forgot
> > it now.
> >
> > What about this over this commit:
>
> Yes, this does seem to fix my concern mentioned in 2. above.

Great. I will include your Tested-by:, Lemme know if you have any
objections.

--
viresh