Currently both iommu_alloc_coherent() and iommu_free_coherent() align the
desired allocation size to PAGE_SIZE, and gets system pages and IOMMU
mappings (TCEs) for that value.
When IOMMU_PAGE_SIZE < PAGE_SIZE, this behavior may cause unnecessary
TCEs to be created for mapping the whole system page.
Example:
- PAGE_SIZE = 64k, IOMMU_PAGE_SIZE() = 4k
- iommu_alloc_coherent() is called for 128 bytes
- 1 system page (64k) is allocated
- 16 IOMMU pages (16 x 4k) are allocated (16 TCEs used)
It would be enough to use a single TCE for this, so 15 TCEs are
wasted in the process.
Update iommu_*_coherent() to make sure the size alignment happens only
for IOMMU_PAGE_SIZE() before calling iommu_alloc() and iommu_free().
Also, on iommu_range_alloc(), replace ALIGN(n, 1 << tbl->it_page_shift)
with IOMMU_PAGE_ALIGN(n, tbl), which is easier to read and does the
same.
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <[email protected]>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c
index 5b69a6a72a0e..3329ef045805 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c
@@ -851,6 +851,7 @@ void *iommu_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, struct iommu_table *tbl,
unsigned int order;
unsigned int nio_pages, io_order;
struct page *page;
+ size_t size_io = size;
size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
order = get_order(size);
@@ -877,8 +878,9 @@ void *iommu_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, struct iommu_table *tbl,
memset(ret, 0, size);
/* Set up tces to cover the allocated range */
- nio_pages = size >> tbl->it_page_shift;
- io_order = get_iommu_order(size, tbl);
+ size_io = IOMMU_PAGE_ALIGN(size_io, tbl);
+ nio_pages = size_io >> tbl->it_page_shift;
+ io_order = get_iommu_order(size_io, tbl);
mapping = iommu_alloc(dev, tbl, ret, nio_pages, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL,
mask >> tbl->it_page_shift, io_order, 0);
if (mapping == DMA_MAPPING_ERROR) {
@@ -893,10 +895,9 @@ void iommu_free_coherent(struct iommu_table *tbl, size_t size,
void *vaddr, dma_addr_t dma_handle)
{
if (tbl) {
- unsigned int nio_pages;
+ size_t size_io = IOMMU_PAGE_ALIGN(size, tbl);
+ unsigned int nio_pages = size_io >> tbl->it_page_shift;
- size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
- nio_pages = size >> tbl->it_page_shift;
iommu_free(tbl, dma_handle, nio_pages);
size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
free_pages((unsigned long)vaddr, get_order(size));
--
2.29.2
Hello,
This patch was also reviewed when it was part of another patchset:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/patch/[email protected]/
On Thu, 2021-03-18 at 14:44 -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> Currently both iommu_alloc_coherent() and iommu_free_coherent() align the
> desired allocation size to PAGE_SIZE, and gets system pages and IOMMU
> mappings (TCEs) for that value.
>
> When IOMMU_PAGE_SIZE < PAGE_SIZE, this behavior may cause unnecessary
> TCEs to be created for mapping the whole system page.
>
> Example:
> - PAGE_SIZE = 64k, IOMMU_PAGE_SIZE() = 4k
> - iommu_alloc_coherent() is called for 128 bytes
> - 1 system page (64k) is allocated
> - 16 IOMMU pages (16 x 4k) are allocated (16 TCEs used)
>
> It would be enough to use a single TCE for this, so 15 TCEs are
> wasted in the process.
>
> Update iommu_*_coherent() to make sure the size alignment happens only
> for IOMMU_PAGE_SIZE() before calling iommu_alloc() and iommu_free().
>
> Also, on iommu_range_alloc(), replace ALIGN(n, 1 << tbl->it_page_shift)
> with IOMMU_PAGE_ALIGN(n, tbl), which is easier to read and does the
> same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c
> index 5b69a6a72a0e..3329ef045805 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c
> @@ -851,6 +851,7 @@ void *iommu_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, struct iommu_table *tbl,
> unsigned int order;
> unsigned int nio_pages, io_order;
> struct page *page;
> + size_t size_io = size;
>
>
> size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
> order = get_order(size);
> @@ -877,8 +878,9 @@ void *iommu_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, struct iommu_table *tbl,
> memset(ret, 0, size);
>
>
> /* Set up tces to cover the allocated range */
> - nio_pages = size >> tbl->it_page_shift;
> - io_order = get_iommu_order(size, tbl);
> + size_io = IOMMU_PAGE_ALIGN(size_io, tbl);
> + nio_pages = size_io >> tbl->it_page_shift;
> + io_order = get_iommu_order(size_io, tbl);
> mapping = iommu_alloc(dev, tbl, ret, nio_pages, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL,
> mask >> tbl->it_page_shift, io_order, 0);
> if (mapping == DMA_MAPPING_ERROR) {
> @@ -893,10 +895,9 @@ void iommu_free_coherent(struct iommu_table *tbl, size_t size,
> void *vaddr, dma_addr_t dma_handle)
> {
> if (tbl) {
> - unsigned int nio_pages;
> + size_t size_io = IOMMU_PAGE_ALIGN(size, tbl);
> + unsigned int nio_pages = size_io >> tbl->it_page_shift;
>
>
> - size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
> - nio_pages = size >> tbl->it_page_shift;
> iommu_free(tbl, dma_handle, nio_pages);
> size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
> free_pages((unsigned long)vaddr, get_order(size));
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 14:44:14 -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> Currently both iommu_alloc_coherent() and iommu_free_coherent() align the
> desired allocation size to PAGE_SIZE, and gets system pages and IOMMU
> mappings (TCEs) for that value.
>
> When IOMMU_PAGE_SIZE < PAGE_SIZE, this behavior may cause unnecessary
> TCEs to be created for mapping the whole system page.
>
> [...]
Applied to powerpc/next.
[1/1] powerpc/kernel/iommu: Align size for IOMMU_PAGE_SIZE() to save TCEs
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/3c0468d4451eb6b4f6604370639f163f9637a479
cheers