2024-05-23 11:56:43

by Andi Shyti

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [GIT PULL] i2c-host changes for v6.10 - pt. 2

Hi Wolfram,

now that the dependencies are fixed and no error report has been
sent on these two patches, I can finally send the second part of
the i2c pull request.

Thanks,
Andi

The following changes since commit c760b3725e52403dc1b28644fb09c47a83cacea6:

Merge tag 'mm-nonmm-stable-2024-05-22-17-30' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm (2024-05-22 18:59:29 -0700)

are available in the Git repository at:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/andi.shyti/linux.git tags/i2c-host-6.10-pt2

for you to fetch changes up to e61bcf42d290e73025bab38e0e55a5586c2d8ad5:

i2c: Remove I2C_CLASS_SPD (2024-05-23 13:38:15 +0200)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Removed the SPD class of i2c devices from the device core.

Additionally, a cleanup in the Synquacer code removes the pclk
from the global structure, as it is used only in the probe.
Therefore, it is now declared locally.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Christophe JAILLET (1):
i2c: synquacer: Remove a clk reference from struct synquacer_i2c

Heiner Kallweit (1):
i2c: Remove I2C_CLASS_SPD

drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-synquacer.c | 11 +++++------
include/linux/i2c.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)


2024-05-23 15:49:06

by Wolfram Sang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] i2c-host changes for v6.10 - pt. 2

Hi Andi,

> now that the dependencies are fixed and no error report has been
> sent on these two patches, I can finally send the second part of
> the i2c pull request.

Pulled, but I can't send out to Linus because
e22e0e483b2c76728ccd119fdcfea81eb176b3a5 (drm/amd/pm: remove deprecated
I2C_CLASS_SPD support from newly added SMU_14_0_2) is not in his tree
yet, only in next.

Happy hacking,

Wolfram


Attachments:
(No filename) (420.00 B)
signature.asc (849.00 B)
Download all attachments

2024-05-23 19:02:48

by Andi Shyti

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] i2c-host changes for v6.10 - pt. 2

Hi Wolfram,

> > now that the dependencies are fixed and no error report has been
> > sent on these two patches, I can finally send the second part of
> > the i2c pull request.
>
> Pulled, but I can't send out to Linus because
> e22e0e483b2c76728ccd119fdcfea81eb176b3a5 (drm/amd/pm: remove deprecated
> I2C_CLASS_SPD support from newly added SMU_14_0_2) is not in his tree
> yet, only in next.

argh! Good catch! I don't have drm amd in my config.

Indeed I don't see Hiner's patch in the DRM pull request and not
even in the AMD's.

OK that needs to shift to the 6.11 pull request.

Thanks,
Andi

2024-05-23 20:19:40

by Wolfram Sang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] i2c-host changes for v6.10 - pt. 2


> > Pulled, but I can't send out to Linus because
> > e22e0e483b2c76728ccd119fdcfea81eb176b3a5 (drm/amd/pm: remove deprecated
> > I2C_CLASS_SPD support from newly added SMU_14_0_2) is not in his tree
> > yet, only in next.
>
> argh! Good catch! I don't have drm amd in my config.

Me neither, I just checked with 'git grep I2C_CLASS_SPD' :)

> OK that needs to shift to the 6.11 pull request.

Hmm, that gives too much time for new users to appear IMO. If you don't
mind, I'll take over and I'll ping them to apply the drm patch soonish,
so I can apply the removal. Doesn't matter if it becomes rc2 or rc3.


Attachments:
(No filename) (626.00 B)
signature.asc (849.00 B)
Download all attachments

2024-05-23 21:25:15

by Andi Shyti

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] i2c-host changes for v6.10 - pt. 2

On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 10:18:50PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > Pulled, but I can't send out to Linus because
> > > e22e0e483b2c76728ccd119fdcfea81eb176b3a5 (drm/amd/pm: remove deprecated
> > > I2C_CLASS_SPD support from newly added SMU_14_0_2) is not in his tree
> > > yet, only in next.
> >
> > argh! Good catch! I don't have drm amd in my config.
>
> Me neither, I just checked with 'git grep I2C_CLASS_SPD' :)
>
> > OK that needs to shift to the 6.11 pull request.
>
> Hmm, that gives too much time for new users to appear IMO. If you don't
> mind, I'll take over and I'll ping them to apply the drm patch soonish,
> so I can apply the removal. Doesn't matter if it becomes rc2 or rc3.

DRM pull requests for merge window are normally sent during -rc5
and only urgent patches are accepted latest in -rc6.

Heiner's patch was taken later.

I can try to to ping Alex Deucher on that specific patch.

In the meantime, I will send a pull request with just
Christophe's patch that can safely be taken.

Thanks,
Andi