2024-05-02 09:52:11

by Dhananjay Ugwekar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Fix energy-pkg event for AMD CPUs

After commit 63edbaa48a57 ("x86/cpu/topology: Add support for the AMD 0x80000026 leaf"),
on AMD processors that support extended CPUID leaf 0x80000026, the
topology_die_cpumask() and topology_logical_die_id(), no longer return
the package cpumask and package id, instead they return the CCD (Core
Complex Die) mask and CCD id respectively. This leads to the energy-pkg
event scope to be modified to CCD instead of package.

This is functionally incorrect as the AMD energy-pkg is a package scope
event.

On a 12 CCD 1 Package AMD Zen4 Genoa machine:

$ cat /sys/devices/power/cpumask
0,8,16,24,32,40,48,56,64,72,80,88.

Expected cpumask for 1 Package AMD CPUs energy-pkg event is supposed to
be just "0".

This in turn leads to incorrect values of package energy consumption.

$ perf stat -C 100 -e power/energy-pkg/ sleep 1

Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 100':

36.60 Joules power/energy-pkg/

1.005821050 seconds time elapsed

$ perf stat -a -e power/energy-pkg/ sleep 1

Performance counter stats for 'system wide':

414.03 Joules power/energy-pkg/

1.005252132 seconds time elapsed

In both cases the energy consumption values should have been the same,
but instead, due to the incorrect cpumask, the values are being
aggregated at a CCD level in the second case.

Replacing the die macros with the package macros(for AMD CPUs) fixes
this issue.

This patch cleanly applies on top of tip/master after
commit acf68d98cae8 ("perf/x86/rapl: Add support for Intel Lunar Lake"),
but not on Linus' tree.

Dhananjay Ugwekar (2):
perf/x86/rapl: Rename maxdie to nr_rapl_pmu and dieid to rapl_pmu_idx
perf/x86/rapl: Fix the energy-pkg event for AMD CPUs

arch/x86/events/rapl.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

--
2.34.1



2024-05-02 09:52:40

by Dhananjay Ugwekar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/rapl: Rename maxdie to nr_rapl_pmu and dieid to rapl_pmu_idx

AMD CPUs have the scope of RAPL energy-pkg event as package, whereas
Intel Cascade Lake CPUs have the scope as die.

To account for the difference in the energy-pkg event scope between AMD
and Intel CPUs, give more generic and semantically correct names to the
maxdie and dieid variables.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <[email protected]>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <[email protected]>
---
arch/x86/events/rapl.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
index ca5f687fa420..46e673585560 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
@@ -114,8 +114,8 @@ struct rapl_pmu {

struct rapl_pmus {
struct pmu pmu;
- unsigned int maxdie;
- struct rapl_pmu *pmus[] __counted_by(maxdie);
+ unsigned int nr_rapl_pmu;
+ struct rapl_pmu *pmus[] __counted_by(nr_rapl_pmu);
};

enum rapl_unit_quirk {
@@ -141,13 +141,13 @@ static struct perf_msr *rapl_msrs;

static inline struct rapl_pmu *cpu_to_rapl_pmu(unsigned int cpu)
{
- unsigned int dieid = topology_logical_die_id(cpu);
+ unsigned int rapl_pmu_idx = topology_logical_die_id(cpu);

/*
* The unsigned check also catches the '-1' return value for non
* existent mappings in the topology map.
*/
- return dieid < rapl_pmus->maxdie ? rapl_pmus->pmus[dieid] : NULL;
+ return rapl_pmu_idx < rapl_pmus->nr_rapl_pmu ? rapl_pmus->pmus[rapl_pmu_idx] : NULL;
}

static inline u64 rapl_read_counter(struct perf_event *event)
@@ -658,7 +658,7 @@ static void cleanup_rapl_pmus(void)
{
int i;

- for (i = 0; i < rapl_pmus->maxdie; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < rapl_pmus->nr_rapl_pmu; i++)
kfree(rapl_pmus->pmus[i]);
kfree(rapl_pmus);
}
@@ -674,13 +674,13 @@ static const struct attribute_group *rapl_attr_update[] = {

static int __init init_rapl_pmus(void)
{
- int maxdie = topology_max_packages() * topology_max_dies_per_package();
+ int nr_rapl_pmu = topology_max_packages() * topology_max_dies_per_package();

- rapl_pmus = kzalloc(struct_size(rapl_pmus, pmus, maxdie), GFP_KERNEL);
+ rapl_pmus = kzalloc(struct_size(rapl_pmus, pmus, nr_rapl_pmu), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!rapl_pmus)
return -ENOMEM;

- rapl_pmus->maxdie = maxdie;
+ rapl_pmus->nr_rapl_pmu = nr_rapl_pmu;
rapl_pmus->pmu.attr_groups = rapl_attr_groups;
rapl_pmus->pmu.attr_update = rapl_attr_update;
rapl_pmus->pmu.task_ctx_nr = perf_invalid_context;
--
2.34.1


2024-05-02 09:53:09

by Dhananjay Ugwekar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/rapl: Fix the energy-pkg event for AMD CPUs

After commit ("x86/cpu/topology: Add support for the AMD 0x80000026 leaf"),
on AMD processors that support extended CPUID leaf 0x80000026, the
topology_die_cpumask() and topology_logical_die_id() macros, no longer
return the package cpumask and package id, instead they return the CCD
(Core Complex Die) mask and id respectively. This leads to the energy-pkg
event scope to be modified to CCD instead of package.

Replacing these macros with their package counterparts fixes the
energy-pkg event for AMD CPUs.

However due to the difference between the scope of energy-pkg event for
Intel and AMD CPUs, we have to replace these macros conditionally only for
AMD CPUs.

On a 12 CCD 1 Package AMD Zen4 Genoa machine:

Before:
$ cat /sys/devices/power/cpumask
0,8,16,24,32,40,48,56,64,72,80,88.

The expected cpumask here is supposed to be just "0", as it is a package
scope event, only one CPU will be collecting the event for all the CPUs in
the package.

After:
$ cat /sys/devices/power/cpumask
0

Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <[email protected]>
Fixes: 63edbaa48a57 ("x86/cpu/topology: Add support for the AMD 0x80000026 leaf")
---
arch/x86/events/rapl.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
index 46e673585560..d77bf7959a43 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
@@ -102,6 +102,10 @@ static struct perf_pmu_events_attr event_attr_##v = { \
.event_str = str, \
};

+#define rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope() \
+ (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD || \
+ boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_HYGON)
+
struct rapl_pmu {
raw_spinlock_t lock;
int n_active;
@@ -139,9 +143,21 @@ static unsigned int rapl_cntr_mask;
static u64 rapl_timer_ms;
static struct perf_msr *rapl_msrs;

+static inline unsigned int get_rapl_pmu_idx(int cpu)
+{
+ return rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope() ? topology_logical_package_id(cpu) :
+ topology_logical_die_id(cpu);
+}
+
+static inline cpumask_t *get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(int cpu)
+{
+ return rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope() ? topology_core_cpumask(cpu) :
+ topology_die_cpumask(cpu);
+}
+
static inline struct rapl_pmu *cpu_to_rapl_pmu(unsigned int cpu)
{
- unsigned int rapl_pmu_idx = topology_logical_die_id(cpu);
+ unsigned int rapl_pmu_idx = get_rapl_pmu_idx(cpu);

/*
* The unsigned check also catches the '-1' return value for non
@@ -542,6 +558,7 @@ static struct perf_msr amd_rapl_msrs[] = {

static int rapl_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
{
+ cpumask_t *cpumask = get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(cpu);
struct rapl_pmu *pmu = cpu_to_rapl_pmu(cpu);
int target;

@@ -551,7 +568,7 @@ static int rapl_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)

pmu->cpu = -1;
/* Find a new cpu to collect rapl events */
- target = cpumask_any_but(topology_die_cpumask(cpu), cpu);
+ target = cpumask_any_but(cpumask, cpu);

/* Migrate rapl events to the new target */
if (target < nr_cpu_ids) {
@@ -564,6 +581,8 @@ static int rapl_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)

static int rapl_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
{
+ unsigned int rapl_pmu_idx = get_rapl_pmu_idx(cpu);
+ cpumask_t *cpumask = get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(cpu);
struct rapl_pmu *pmu = cpu_to_rapl_pmu(cpu);
int target;

@@ -578,14 +597,14 @@ static int rapl_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
pmu->timer_interval = ms_to_ktime(rapl_timer_ms);
rapl_hrtimer_init(pmu);

- rapl_pmus->pmus[topology_logical_die_id(cpu)] = pmu;
+ rapl_pmus->pmus[rapl_pmu_idx] = pmu;
}

/*
* Check if there is an online cpu in the package which collects rapl
* events already.
*/
- target = cpumask_any_and(&rapl_cpu_mask, topology_die_cpumask(cpu));
+ target = cpumask_any_and(&rapl_cpu_mask, cpumask);
if (target < nr_cpu_ids)
return 0;

@@ -676,6 +695,9 @@ static int __init init_rapl_pmus(void)
{
int nr_rapl_pmu = topology_max_packages() * topology_max_dies_per_package();

+ if (rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope())
+ nr_rapl_pmu = topology_max_packages();
+
rapl_pmus = kzalloc(struct_size(rapl_pmus, pmus, nr_rapl_pmu), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!rapl_pmus)
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.34.1


Subject: [tip: perf/core] perf/x86/rapl: Rename 'maxdie' to nr_rapl_pmu and 'dieid' to rapl_pmu_idx

The following commit has been merged into the perf/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID: 626c5acf39ba929a0d82d37e72072e21492a958e
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/626c5acf39ba929a0d82d37e72072e21492a958e
Author: Dhananjay Ugwekar <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Thu, 02 May 2024 15:21:14 +05:30
Committer: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
CommitterDate: Thu, 02 May 2024 13:32:21 +02:00

perf/x86/rapl: Rename 'maxdie' to nr_rapl_pmu and 'dieid' to rapl_pmu_idx

AMD CPUs have the scope of RAPL energy-pkg event as package, whereas
Intel Cascade Lake CPUs have the scope as die.

To account for the difference in the energy-pkg event scope between AMD
and Intel CPUs, give more generic and semantically correct names to the
maxdie and dieid variables.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
---
arch/x86/events/rapl.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
index ca5f687..46e6735 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
@@ -114,8 +114,8 @@ struct rapl_pmu {

struct rapl_pmus {
struct pmu pmu;
- unsigned int maxdie;
- struct rapl_pmu *pmus[] __counted_by(maxdie);
+ unsigned int nr_rapl_pmu;
+ struct rapl_pmu *pmus[] __counted_by(nr_rapl_pmu);
};

enum rapl_unit_quirk {
@@ -141,13 +141,13 @@ static struct perf_msr *rapl_msrs;

static inline struct rapl_pmu *cpu_to_rapl_pmu(unsigned int cpu)
{
- unsigned int dieid = topology_logical_die_id(cpu);
+ unsigned int rapl_pmu_idx = topology_logical_die_id(cpu);

/*
* The unsigned check also catches the '-1' return value for non
* existent mappings in the topology map.
*/
- return dieid < rapl_pmus->maxdie ? rapl_pmus->pmus[dieid] : NULL;
+ return rapl_pmu_idx < rapl_pmus->nr_rapl_pmu ? rapl_pmus->pmus[rapl_pmu_idx] : NULL;
}

static inline u64 rapl_read_counter(struct perf_event *event)
@@ -658,7 +658,7 @@ static void cleanup_rapl_pmus(void)
{
int i;

- for (i = 0; i < rapl_pmus->maxdie; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < rapl_pmus->nr_rapl_pmu; i++)
kfree(rapl_pmus->pmus[i]);
kfree(rapl_pmus);
}
@@ -674,13 +674,13 @@ static const struct attribute_group *rapl_attr_update[] = {

static int __init init_rapl_pmus(void)
{
- int maxdie = topology_max_packages() * topology_max_dies_per_package();
+ int nr_rapl_pmu = topology_max_packages() * topology_max_dies_per_package();

- rapl_pmus = kzalloc(struct_size(rapl_pmus, pmus, maxdie), GFP_KERNEL);
+ rapl_pmus = kzalloc(struct_size(rapl_pmus, pmus, nr_rapl_pmu), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!rapl_pmus)
return -ENOMEM;

- rapl_pmus->maxdie = maxdie;
+ rapl_pmus->nr_rapl_pmu = nr_rapl_pmu;
rapl_pmus->pmu.attr_groups = rapl_attr_groups;
rapl_pmus->pmu.attr_update = rapl_attr_update;
rapl_pmus->pmu.task_ctx_nr = perf_invalid_context;

Subject: [tip: perf/core] perf/x86/rapl: Fix the energy-pkg event for AMD CPUs

The following commit has been merged into the perf/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID: 5d4d0283c0546559600dee7e9a4d87e402f3f4d9
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/5d4d0283c0546559600dee7e9a4d87e402f3f4d9
Author: Dhananjay Ugwekar <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Thu, 02 May 2024 15:21:15 +05:30
Committer: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
CommitterDate: Thu, 02 May 2024 13:32:22 +02:00

perf/x86/rapl: Fix the energy-pkg event for AMD CPUs

After:

63edbaa48a57 ("x86/cpu/topology: Add support for the AMD 0x80000026 leaf")

on AMD processors that support extended CPUID leaf 0x80000026, the
topology_die_cpumask() and topology_logical_die_id() macros, no longer
return the package cpumask and package id, instead they return the CCD
(Core Complex Die) mask and id respectively. This leads to the energy-pkg
event scope to be modified to CCD instead of package.

Replacing these macros with their package counterparts fixes the
energy-pkg event for AMD CPUs.

However due to the difference between the scope of energy-pkg event for
Intel and AMD CPUs, we have to replace these macros conditionally only for
AMD CPUs.

On a 12 CCD 1 Package AMD Zen4 Genoa machine:

Before:

$ cat /sys/devices/power/cpumask
0,8,16,24,32,40,48,56,64,72,80,88.

The expected cpumask here is supposed to be just "0", as it is a package
scope event, only one CPU will be collecting the event for all the CPUs in
the package.

After:
$ cat /sys/devices/power/cpumask
0

Fixes: 63edbaa48a57 ("x86/cpu/topology: Add support for the AMD 0x80000026 leaf")
Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
---
arch/x86/events/rapl.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
index 46e6735..c3897f5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
@@ -102,6 +102,10 @@ static struct perf_pmu_events_attr event_attr_##v = { \
.event_str = str, \
};

+#define rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope() \
+ (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD || \
+ boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_HYGON)
+
struct rapl_pmu {
raw_spinlock_t lock;
int n_active;
@@ -139,9 +143,21 @@ static unsigned int rapl_cntr_mask;
static u64 rapl_timer_ms;
static struct perf_msr *rapl_msrs;

+static inline unsigned int get_rapl_pmu_idx(int cpu)
+{
+ return rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope() ? topology_logical_package_id(cpu) :
+ topology_logical_die_id(cpu);
+}
+
+static inline cpumask_t *get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(int cpu)
+{
+ return rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope() ? topology_core_cpumask(cpu) :
+ topology_die_cpumask(cpu);
+}
+
static inline struct rapl_pmu *cpu_to_rapl_pmu(unsigned int cpu)
{
- unsigned int rapl_pmu_idx = topology_logical_die_id(cpu);
+ unsigned int rapl_pmu_idx = get_rapl_pmu_idx(cpu);

/*
* The unsigned check also catches the '-1' return value for non
@@ -542,6 +558,7 @@ static struct perf_msr amd_rapl_msrs[] = {

static int rapl_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
{
+ cpumask_t *cpumask = get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(cpu);
struct rapl_pmu *pmu = cpu_to_rapl_pmu(cpu);
int target;

@@ -551,7 +568,7 @@ static int rapl_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)

pmu->cpu = -1;
/* Find a new cpu to collect rapl events */
- target = cpumask_any_but(topology_die_cpumask(cpu), cpu);
+ target = cpumask_any_but(cpumask, cpu);

/* Migrate rapl events to the new target */
if (target < nr_cpu_ids) {
@@ -564,6 +581,8 @@ static int rapl_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)

static int rapl_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
{
+ unsigned int rapl_pmu_idx = get_rapl_pmu_idx(cpu);
+ cpumask_t *cpumask = get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(cpu);
struct rapl_pmu *pmu = cpu_to_rapl_pmu(cpu);
int target;

@@ -578,14 +597,14 @@ static int rapl_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
pmu->timer_interval = ms_to_ktime(rapl_timer_ms);
rapl_hrtimer_init(pmu);

- rapl_pmus->pmus[topology_logical_die_id(cpu)] = pmu;
+ rapl_pmus->pmus[rapl_pmu_idx] = pmu;
}

/*
* Check if there is an online cpu in the package which collects rapl
* events already.
*/
- target = cpumask_any_and(&rapl_cpu_mask, topology_die_cpumask(cpu));
+ target = cpumask_any_and(&rapl_cpu_mask, cpumask);
if (target < nr_cpu_ids)
return 0;

@@ -676,6 +695,9 @@ static int __init init_rapl_pmus(void)
{
int nr_rapl_pmu = topology_max_packages() * topology_max_dies_per_package();

+ if (rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope())
+ nr_rapl_pmu = topology_max_packages();
+
rapl_pmus = kzalloc(struct_size(rapl_pmus, pmus, nr_rapl_pmu), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!rapl_pmus)
return -ENOMEM;

2024-05-03 09:56:16

by Ingo Molnar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/rapl: Fix the energy-pkg event for AMD CPUs


* Dhananjay Ugwekar <[email protected]> wrote:

> After commit ("x86/cpu/topology: Add support for the AMD 0x80000026 leaf"),
> on AMD processors that support extended CPUID leaf 0x80000026, the
> topology_die_cpumask() and topology_logical_die_id() macros, no longer
> return the package cpumask and package id, instead they return the CCD
> (Core Complex Die) mask and id respectively. This leads to the energy-pkg
> event scope to be modified to CCD instead of package.
>
> Replacing these macros with their package counterparts fixes the
> energy-pkg event for AMD CPUs.
>
> However due to the difference between the scope of energy-pkg event for
> Intel and AMD CPUs, we have to replace these macros conditionally only for
> AMD CPUs.
>
> On a 12 CCD 1 Package AMD Zen4 Genoa machine:
>
> Before:
> $ cat /sys/devices/power/cpumask
> 0,8,16,24,32,40,48,56,64,72,80,88.
>
> The expected cpumask here is supposed to be just "0", as it is a package
> scope event, only one CPU will be collecting the event for all the CPUs in
> the package.
>
> After:
> $ cat /sys/devices/power/cpumask
> 0
>
> Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <[email protected]>
> Fixes: 63edbaa48a57 ("x86/cpu/topology: Add support for the AMD 0x80000026 leaf")
> ---
> arch/x86/events/rapl.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
> index 46e673585560..d77bf7959a43 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
> @@ -102,6 +102,10 @@ static struct perf_pmu_events_attr event_attr_##v = { \
> .event_str = str, \
> };
>
> +#define rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope() \
> + (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD || \
> + boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_HYGON)
> +
> struct rapl_pmu {
> raw_spinlock_t lock;
> int n_active;
> @@ -139,9 +143,21 @@ static unsigned int rapl_cntr_mask;
> static u64 rapl_timer_ms;
> static struct perf_msr *rapl_msrs;
>
> +static inline unsigned int get_rapl_pmu_idx(int cpu)
> +{
> + return rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope() ? topology_logical_package_id(cpu) :
> + topology_logical_die_id(cpu);
> +}
> +
> +static inline cpumask_t *get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(int cpu)
> +{
> + return rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope() ? topology_core_cpumask(cpu) :
> + topology_die_cpumask(cpu);
> +}

Note that this breaks the build with this config:

https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240503/[email protected]/config

I've removed the commit from perf/core for now.

Thanks,

Ingo

2024-05-03 10:07:24

by Dhananjay Ugwekar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/rapl: Fix the energy-pkg event for AMD CPUs

Hi Ingo,

On 5/3/2024 3:24 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Dhananjay Ugwekar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> After commit ("x86/cpu/topology: Add support for the AMD 0x80000026 leaf"),
>> on AMD processors that support extended CPUID leaf 0x80000026, the
>> topology_die_cpumask() and topology_logical_die_id() macros, no longer
>> return the package cpumask and package id, instead they return the CCD
>> (Core Complex Die) mask and id respectively. This leads to the energy-pkg
>> event scope to be modified to CCD instead of package.
>>
>> Replacing these macros with their package counterparts fixes the
>> energy-pkg event for AMD CPUs.
>>
>> However due to the difference between the scope of energy-pkg event for
>> Intel and AMD CPUs, we have to replace these macros conditionally only for
>> AMD CPUs.
>>
>> On a 12 CCD 1 Package AMD Zen4 Genoa machine:
>>
>> Before:
>> $ cat /sys/devices/power/cpumask
>> 0,8,16,24,32,40,48,56,64,72,80,88.
>>
>> The expected cpumask here is supposed to be just "0", as it is a package
>> scope event, only one CPU will be collecting the event for all the CPUs in
>> the package.
>>
>> After:
>> $ cat /sys/devices/power/cpumask
>> 0
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <[email protected]>
>> Fixes: 63edbaa48a57 ("x86/cpu/topology: Add support for the AMD 0x80000026 leaf")
>> ---
>> arch/x86/events/rapl.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
>> index 46e673585560..d77bf7959a43 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
>> @@ -102,6 +102,10 @@ static struct perf_pmu_events_attr event_attr_##v = { \
>> .event_str = str, \
>> };
>>
>> +#define rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope() \
>> + (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD || \
>> + boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_HYGON)
>> +
>> struct rapl_pmu {
>> raw_spinlock_t lock;
>> int n_active;
>> @@ -139,9 +143,21 @@ static unsigned int rapl_cntr_mask;
>> static u64 rapl_timer_ms;
>> static struct perf_msr *rapl_msrs;
>>
>> +static inline unsigned int get_rapl_pmu_idx(int cpu)
>> +{
>> + return rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope() ? topology_logical_package_id(cpu) :
>> + topology_logical_die_id(cpu);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline cpumask_t *get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(int cpu)
>> +{
>> + return rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope() ? topology_core_cpumask(cpu) :
>> + topology_die_cpumask(cpu);
>> +}
>
> Note that this breaks the build with this config:
>
> https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240503/[email protected]/config
>
> I've removed the commit from perf/core for now.

Sure, will fix this in v2.

Regards,
Dhananjay

>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo

2024-05-04 04:10:18

by Dhananjay Ugwekar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] perf/x86/rapl: Fix the energy-pkg event for AMD CPUs

After commit ("x86/cpu/topology: Add support for the AMD 0x80000026 leaf"),
on AMD processors that support extended CPUID leaf 0x80000026, the
topology_die_cpumask() and topology_logical_die_id() macros, no longer
return the package cpumask and package id, instead they return the CCD
(Core Complex Die) mask and id respectively. This leads to the energy-pkg
event scope to be modified to CCD instead of package.

Replacing these macros with their package counterparts fixes the
energy-pkg event for AMD CPUs.

However due to the difference between the scope of energy-pkg event for
Intel and AMD CPUs, we have to replace these macros conditionally only for
AMD CPUs.

On a 12 CCD 1 Package AMD Zen4 Genoa machine:

Before:
$ cat /sys/devices/power/cpumask
0,8,16,24,32,40,48,56,64,72,80,88.

The expected cpumask here is supposed to be just "0", as it is a package
scope event, only one CPU will be collecting the event for all the CPUs in
the package.

After:
$ cat /sys/devices/power/cpumask
0

Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <[email protected]>
Fixes: 63edbaa48a57 ("x86/cpu/topology: Add support for the AMD 0x80000026 leaf")
---
v1->v2:
* Fix the const qualifier discarded error (kernel test bot)
* Change the cpumask variable name from cpumask to rapl_pmu_cpumask
---
arch/x86/events/rapl.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
index 46e673585560..d77bf7959a43 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
@@ -102,6 +102,10 @@ static struct perf_pmu_events_attr event_attr_##v = { \
.event_str = str, \
};

+#define rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope() \
+ (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD || \
+ boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_HYGON)
+
struct rapl_pmu {
raw_spinlock_t lock;
int n_active;
@@ -139,9 +143,21 @@ static unsigned int rapl_cntr_mask;
static u64 rapl_timer_ms;
static struct perf_msr *rapl_msrs;

+static inline unsigned int get_rapl_pmu_idx(int cpu)
+{
+ return rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope() ? topology_logical_package_id(cpu) :
+ topology_logical_die_id(cpu);
+}
+
+static inline const struct cpumask *get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(int cpu)
+{
+ return rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope() ? topology_core_cpumask(cpu) :
+ topology_die_cpumask(cpu);
+}
+
static inline struct rapl_pmu *cpu_to_rapl_pmu(unsigned int cpu)
{
- unsigned int rapl_pmu_idx = topology_logical_die_id(cpu);
+ unsigned int rapl_pmu_idx = get_rapl_pmu_idx(cpu);

/*
* The unsigned check also catches the '-1' return value for non
@@ -542,6 +558,7 @@ static struct perf_msr amd_rapl_msrs[] = {

static int rapl_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
{
+ const struct cpumask *rapl_pmu_cpumask = get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(cpu);
struct rapl_pmu *pmu = cpu_to_rapl_pmu(cpu);
int target;

@@ -551,7 +568,7 @@ static int rapl_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)

pmu->cpu = -1;
/* Find a new cpu to collect rapl events */
- target = cpumask_any_but(topology_die_cpumask(cpu), cpu);
+ target = cpumask_any_but(rapl_pmu_cpumask, cpu);

/* Migrate rapl events to the new target */
if (target < nr_cpu_ids) {
@@ -564,6 +581,8 @@ static int rapl_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)

static int rapl_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
{
+ unsigned int rapl_pmu_idx = get_rapl_pmu_idx(cpu);
+ const struct cpumask *rapl_pmu_cpumask = get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(cpu);
struct rapl_pmu *pmu = cpu_to_rapl_pmu(cpu);
int target;

@@ -578,14 +597,14 @@ static int rapl_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
pmu->timer_interval = ms_to_ktime(rapl_timer_ms);
rapl_hrtimer_init(pmu);

- rapl_pmus->pmus[topology_logical_die_id(cpu)] = pmu;
+ rapl_pmus->pmus[rapl_pmu_idx] = pmu;
}

/*
* Check if there is an online cpu in the package which collects rapl
* events already.
*/
- target = cpumask_any_and(&rapl_cpu_mask, topology_die_cpumask(cpu));
+ target = cpumask_any_and(&rapl_cpu_mask, rapl_pmu_cpumask);
if (target < nr_cpu_ids)
return 0;

@@ -676,6 +695,9 @@ static int __init init_rapl_pmus(void)
{
int nr_rapl_pmu = topology_max_packages() * topology_max_dies_per_package();

+ if (rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope())
+ nr_rapl_pmu = topology_max_packages();
+
rapl_pmus = kzalloc(struct_size(rapl_pmus, pmus, nr_rapl_pmu), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!rapl_pmus)
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.34.1


2024-05-27 06:27:49

by Dhananjay Ugwekar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] perf/x86/rapl: Fix the energy-pkg event for AMD CPUs

Hello Ingo,

Gentle ping, since the commit 63edbaa48a57 ("x86/cpu/topology: Add support for the AMD 0x80000026 leaf"),
went in 6.10-rc1 as a part of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/, can this fix be
considered for 6.10-rc material.

This still cleanly applies on top of 6.10-rc1.

Thanks,
Dhananjay

On 5/4/2024 9:39 AM, Dhananjay Ugwekar wrote:
> After commit ("x86/cpu/topology: Add support for the AMD 0x80000026 leaf"),
> on AMD processors that support extended CPUID leaf 0x80000026, the
> topology_die_cpumask() and topology_logical_die_id() macros, no longer
> return the package cpumask and package id, instead they return the CCD
> (Core Complex Die) mask and id respectively. This leads to the energy-pkg
> event scope to be modified to CCD instead of package.
>
> Replacing these macros with their package counterparts fixes the
> energy-pkg event for AMD CPUs.
>
> However due to the difference between the scope of energy-pkg event for
> Intel and AMD CPUs, we have to replace these macros conditionally only for
> AMD CPUs.
>
> On a 12 CCD 1 Package AMD Zen4 Genoa machine:
>
> Before:
> $ cat /sys/devices/power/cpumask
> 0,8,16,24,32,40,48,56,64,72,80,88.
>
> The expected cpumask here is supposed to be just "0", as it is a package
> scope event, only one CPU will be collecting the event for all the CPUs in
> the package.
>
> After:
> $ cat /sys/devices/power/cpumask
> 0
>
> Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <[email protected]>
> Fixes: 63edbaa48a57 ("x86/cpu/topology: Add support for the AMD 0x80000026 leaf")
> ---
> v1->v2:
> * Fix the const qualifier discarded error (kernel test bot)
> * Change the cpumask variable name from cpumask to rapl_pmu_cpumask
> ---
> arch/x86/events/rapl.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
> index 46e673585560..d77bf7959a43 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
> @@ -102,6 +102,10 @@ static struct perf_pmu_events_attr event_attr_##v = { \
> .event_str = str, \
> };
>
> +#define rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope() \
> + (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD || \
> + boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_HYGON)
> +
> struct rapl_pmu {
> raw_spinlock_t lock;
> int n_active;
> @@ -139,9 +143,21 @@ static unsigned int rapl_cntr_mask;
> static u64 rapl_timer_ms;
> static struct perf_msr *rapl_msrs;
>
> +static inline unsigned int get_rapl_pmu_idx(int cpu)
> +{
> + return rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope() ? topology_logical_package_id(cpu) :
> + topology_logical_die_id(cpu);
> +}
> +
> +static inline const struct cpumask *get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(int cpu)
> +{
> + return rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope() ? topology_core_cpumask(cpu) :
> + topology_die_cpumask(cpu);
> +}
> +
> static inline struct rapl_pmu *cpu_to_rapl_pmu(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> - unsigned int rapl_pmu_idx = topology_logical_die_id(cpu);
> + unsigned int rapl_pmu_idx = get_rapl_pmu_idx(cpu);
>
> /*
> * The unsigned check also catches the '-1' return value for non
> @@ -542,6 +558,7 @@ static struct perf_msr amd_rapl_msrs[] = {
>
> static int rapl_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> + const struct cpumask *rapl_pmu_cpumask = get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(cpu);
> struct rapl_pmu *pmu = cpu_to_rapl_pmu(cpu);
> int target;
>
> @@ -551,7 +568,7 @@ static int rapl_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
>
> pmu->cpu = -1;
> /* Find a new cpu to collect rapl events */
> - target = cpumask_any_but(topology_die_cpumask(cpu), cpu);
> + target = cpumask_any_but(rapl_pmu_cpumask, cpu);
>
> /* Migrate rapl events to the new target */
> if (target < nr_cpu_ids) {
> @@ -564,6 +581,8 @@ static int rapl_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
>
> static int rapl_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> + unsigned int rapl_pmu_idx = get_rapl_pmu_idx(cpu);
> + const struct cpumask *rapl_pmu_cpumask = get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(cpu);
> struct rapl_pmu *pmu = cpu_to_rapl_pmu(cpu);
> int target;
>
> @@ -578,14 +597,14 @@ static int rapl_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
> pmu->timer_interval = ms_to_ktime(rapl_timer_ms);
> rapl_hrtimer_init(pmu);
>
> - rapl_pmus->pmus[topology_logical_die_id(cpu)] = pmu;
> + rapl_pmus->pmus[rapl_pmu_idx] = pmu;
> }
>
> /*
> * Check if there is an online cpu in the package which collects rapl
> * events already.
> */
> - target = cpumask_any_and(&rapl_cpu_mask, topology_die_cpumask(cpu));
> + target = cpumask_any_and(&rapl_cpu_mask, rapl_pmu_cpumask);
> if (target < nr_cpu_ids)
> return 0;
>
> @@ -676,6 +695,9 @@ static int __init init_rapl_pmus(void)
> {
> int nr_rapl_pmu = topology_max_packages() * topology_max_dies_per_package();
>
> + if (rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope())
> + nr_rapl_pmu = topology_max_packages();
> +
> rapl_pmus = kzalloc(struct_size(rapl_pmus, pmus, nr_rapl_pmu), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!rapl_pmus)
> return -ENOMEM;