2020-07-01 21:58:37

by Jonas Karlman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 3/9] media: rkvdec: h264: Fix pic width and height in mbs

The width and height in mbs is currently configured based on OUTPUT buffer
resolution, this works for frame pictures but can cause issues for field
pictures or when frmsize step_width is changed to support 10-bit decoding.

When frame_mbs_only_flag is 0 the height in mbs should be height of
the field instead of height of frame.

Validate pic_width_in_mbs_minus1 and pic_height_in_map_units_minus1
against CAPTURE buffer resolution and use these values to configure HW.

Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman <[email protected]>
---
drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec-h264.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec-h264.c b/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec-h264.c
index f0cfed84d60d..c9aebeb8f9b3 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec-h264.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec-h264.c
@@ -672,8 +672,8 @@ static void assemble_hw_pps(struct rkvdec_ctx *ctx,
LOG2_MAX_PIC_ORDER_CNT_LSB_MINUS4);
WRITE_PPS(!!(sps->flags & V4L2_H264_SPS_FLAG_DELTA_PIC_ORDER_ALWAYS_ZERO),
DELTA_PIC_ORDER_ALWAYS_ZERO_FLAG);
- WRITE_PPS(DIV_ROUND_UP(ctx->coded_fmt.fmt.pix_mp.width, 16), PIC_WIDTH_IN_MBS);
- WRITE_PPS(DIV_ROUND_UP(ctx->coded_fmt.fmt.pix_mp.height, 16), PIC_HEIGHT_IN_MBS);
+ WRITE_PPS(sps->pic_width_in_mbs_minus1 + 1, PIC_WIDTH_IN_MBS);
+ WRITE_PPS(sps->pic_height_in_map_units_minus1 + 1, PIC_HEIGHT_IN_MBS);
WRITE_PPS(!!(sps->flags & V4L2_H264_SPS_FLAG_FRAME_MBS_ONLY),
FRAME_MBS_ONLY_FLAG);
WRITE_PPS(!!(sps->flags & V4L2_H264_SPS_FLAG_MB_ADAPTIVE_FRAME_FIELD),
@@ -1058,10 +1058,33 @@ static void rkvdec_h264_stop(struct rkvdec_ctx *ctx)
kfree(h264_ctx);
}

-static void rkvdec_h264_run_preamble(struct rkvdec_ctx *ctx,
- struct rkvdec_h264_run *run)
+static int validate_sps(struct rkvdec_ctx *ctx,
+ const struct v4l2_ctrl_h264_sps *sps)
+{
+ unsigned int width, height;
+
+ if (WARN_ON(!sps))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ width = (sps->pic_width_in_mbs_minus1 + 1) * 16;
+ height = (sps->pic_height_in_map_units_minus1 + 1) * 16;
+
+ if (width > ctx->decoded_fmt.fmt.pix_mp.width ||
+ height > ctx->decoded_fmt.fmt.pix_mp.height) {
+ dev_err(ctx->dev->dev,
+ "unexpected bitstream resolution %ux%u\n",
+ width, height);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int rkvdec_h264_run_preamble(struct rkvdec_ctx *ctx,
+ struct rkvdec_h264_run *run)
{
struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl;
+ int ret;

ctrl = v4l2_ctrl_find(&ctx->ctrl_hdl,
V4L2_CID_MPEG_VIDEO_H264_DECODE_PARAMS);
@@ -1080,6 +1103,12 @@ static void rkvdec_h264_run_preamble(struct rkvdec_ctx *ctx,
run->scaling_matrix = ctrl ? ctrl->p_cur.p : NULL;

rkvdec_run_preamble(ctx, &run->base);
+
+ ret = validate_sps(ctx, run->sps);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return 0;
}

static int rkvdec_h264_run(struct rkvdec_ctx *ctx)
@@ -1088,8 +1117,13 @@ static int rkvdec_h264_run(struct rkvdec_ctx *ctx)
struct rkvdec_dev *rkvdec = ctx->dev;
struct rkvdec_h264_ctx *h264_ctx = ctx->priv;
struct rkvdec_h264_run run;
+ int ret;

- rkvdec_h264_run_preamble(ctx, &run);
+ ret = rkvdec_h264_run_preamble(ctx, &run);
+ if (ret) {
+ rkvdec_run_postamble(ctx, &run.base);
+ return ret;
+ }

/* Build the P/B{0,1} ref lists. */
v4l2_h264_init_reflist_builder(&reflist_builder, run.decode_params,
--
2.17.1


2020-07-03 02:49:24

by Ezequiel Garcia

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] media: rkvdec: h264: Fix pic width and height in mbs

On Wed, 2020-07-01 at 21:56 +0000, Jonas Karlman wrote:
> The width and height in mbs is currently configured based on OUTPUT buffer
> resolution, this works for frame pictures but can cause issues for field
> pictures or when frmsize step_width is changed to support 10-bit decoding.
>
> When frame_mbs_only_flag is 0 the height in mbs should be height of
> the field instead of height of frame.
>
> Validate pic_width_in_mbs_minus1 and pic_height_in_map_units_minus1
> against CAPTURE buffer resolution and use these values to configure HW.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec-h264.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec-h264.c b/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec-h264.c
> index f0cfed84d60d..c9aebeb8f9b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec-h264.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec-h264.c
> @@ -672,8 +672,8 @@ static void assemble_hw_pps(struct rkvdec_ctx *ctx,
> LOG2_MAX_PIC_ORDER_CNT_LSB_MINUS4);
> WRITE_PPS(!!(sps->flags & V4L2_H264_SPS_FLAG_DELTA_PIC_ORDER_ALWAYS_ZERO),
> DELTA_PIC_ORDER_ALWAYS_ZERO_FLAG);
> - WRITE_PPS(DIV_ROUND_UP(ctx->coded_fmt.fmt.pix_mp.width, 16), PIC_WIDTH_IN_MBS);
> - WRITE_PPS(DIV_ROUND_UP(ctx->coded_fmt.fmt.pix_mp.height, 16), PIC_HEIGHT_IN_MBS);
> + WRITE_PPS(sps->pic_width_in_mbs_minus1 + 1, PIC_WIDTH_IN_MBS);
> + WRITE_PPS(sps->pic_height_in_map_units_minus1 + 1, PIC_HEIGHT_IN_MBS);
> WRITE_PPS(!!(sps->flags & V4L2_H264_SPS_FLAG_FRAME_MBS_ONLY),
> FRAME_MBS_ONLY_FLAG);
> WRITE_PPS(!!(sps->flags & V4L2_H264_SPS_FLAG_MB_ADAPTIVE_FRAME_FIELD),
> @@ -1058,10 +1058,33 @@ static void rkvdec_h264_stop(struct rkvdec_ctx *ctx)
> kfree(h264_ctx);
> }
>
> -static void rkvdec_h264_run_preamble(struct rkvdec_ctx *ctx,
> - struct rkvdec_h264_run *run)
> +static int validate_sps(struct rkvdec_ctx *ctx,
> + const struct v4l2_ctrl_h264_sps *sps)
> +{
> + unsigned int width, height;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(!sps))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + width = (sps->pic_width_in_mbs_minus1 + 1) * 16;
> + height = (sps->pic_height_in_map_units_minus1 + 1) * 16;
> +
> + if (width > ctx->decoded_fmt.fmt.pix_mp.width ||
> + height > ctx->decoded_fmt.fmt.pix_mp.height) {

Why using decoded_fmt instead of coded_fmt?

Also, by the time the SPS control is passed, the OUTPUT
and CAPTURE formats should be already set, so it should be
possible to validate the SPS at TRY_EXT_CTRLS, using
v4l2_ctrl_ops.try_ctrl.

That would be much better, since once the application
calls STREAMON on both queues, I think things are
expected to be validated as much as possible.

Thanks,
Ezequiel

> + dev_err(ctx->dev->dev,
> + "unexpected bitstream resolution %ux%u\n",
> + width, height);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int rkvdec_h264_run_preamble(struct rkvdec_ctx *ctx,
> + struct rkvdec_h264_run *run)
> {
> struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl;
> + int ret;
>
> ctrl = v4l2_ctrl_find(&ctx->ctrl_hdl,
> V4L2_CID_MPEG_VIDEO_H264_DECODE_PARAMS);
> @@ -1080,6 +1103,12 @@ static void rkvdec_h264_run_preamble(struct rkvdec_ctx *ctx,
> run->scaling_matrix = ctrl ? ctrl->p_cur.p : NULL;
>
> rkvdec_run_preamble(ctx, &run->base);
> +
> + ret = validate_sps(ctx, run->sps);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int rkvdec_h264_run(struct rkvdec_ctx *ctx)
> @@ -1088,8 +1117,13 @@ static int rkvdec_h264_run(struct rkvdec_ctx *ctx)
> struct rkvdec_dev *rkvdec = ctx->dev;
> struct rkvdec_h264_ctx *h264_ctx = ctx->priv;
> struct rkvdec_h264_run run;
> + int ret;
>
> - rkvdec_h264_run_preamble(ctx, &run);
> + ret = rkvdec_h264_run_preamble(ctx, &run);
> + if (ret) {
> + rkvdec_run_postamble(ctx, &run.base);
> + return ret;
> + }
>
> /* Build the P/B{0,1} ref lists. */
> v4l2_h264_init_reflist_builder(&reflist_builder, run.decode_params,


2020-07-03 11:29:10

by Jonas Karlman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] media: rkvdec: h264: Fix pic width and height in mbs

On 2020-07-03 04:48, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-07-01 at 21:56 +0000, Jonas Karlman wrote:
>> The width and height in mbs is currently configured based on OUTPUT buffer
>> resolution, this works for frame pictures but can cause issues for field
>> pictures or when frmsize step_width is changed to support 10-bit decoding.
>>
>> When frame_mbs_only_flag is 0 the height in mbs should be height of
>> the field instead of height of frame.
>>
>> Validate pic_width_in_mbs_minus1 and pic_height_in_map_units_minus1
>> against CAPTURE buffer resolution and use these values to configure HW.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec-h264.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec-h264.c b/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec-h264.c
>> index f0cfed84d60d..c9aebeb8f9b3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec-h264.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec-h264.c
>> @@ -672,8 +672,8 @@ static void assemble_hw_pps(struct rkvdec_ctx *ctx,
>> LOG2_MAX_PIC_ORDER_CNT_LSB_MINUS4);
>> WRITE_PPS(!!(sps->flags & V4L2_H264_SPS_FLAG_DELTA_PIC_ORDER_ALWAYS_ZERO),
>> DELTA_PIC_ORDER_ALWAYS_ZERO_FLAG);
>> - WRITE_PPS(DIV_ROUND_UP(ctx->coded_fmt.fmt.pix_mp.width, 16), PIC_WIDTH_IN_MBS);
>> - WRITE_PPS(DIV_ROUND_UP(ctx->coded_fmt.fmt.pix_mp.height, 16), PIC_HEIGHT_IN_MBS);
>> + WRITE_PPS(sps->pic_width_in_mbs_minus1 + 1, PIC_WIDTH_IN_MBS);
>> + WRITE_PPS(sps->pic_height_in_map_units_minus1 + 1, PIC_HEIGHT_IN_MBS);
>> WRITE_PPS(!!(sps->flags & V4L2_H264_SPS_FLAG_FRAME_MBS_ONLY),
>> FRAME_MBS_ONLY_FLAG);
>> WRITE_PPS(!!(sps->flags & V4L2_H264_SPS_FLAG_MB_ADAPTIVE_FRAME_FIELD),
>> @@ -1058,10 +1058,33 @@ static void rkvdec_h264_stop(struct rkvdec_ctx *ctx)
>> kfree(h264_ctx);
>> }
>>
>> -static void rkvdec_h264_run_preamble(struct rkvdec_ctx *ctx,
>> - struct rkvdec_h264_run *run)
>> +static int validate_sps(struct rkvdec_ctx *ctx,
>> + const struct v4l2_ctrl_h264_sps *sps)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int width, height;
>> +
>> + if (WARN_ON(!sps))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + width = (sps->pic_width_in_mbs_minus1 + 1) * 16;
>> + height = (sps->pic_height_in_map_units_minus1 + 1) * 16;
>> +
>> + if (width > ctx->decoded_fmt.fmt.pix_mp.width ||
>> + height > ctx->decoded_fmt.fmt.pix_mp.height) {
>
> Why using decoded_fmt instead of coded_fmt?

I used decoded_fmt because that would be the outer limits of what can be
decoded into in the CAPTURE buffer. Not sure if or how coded_fmt is validated
that it does not exceed the decoded_fmt resolution.

>
> Also, by the time the SPS control is passed, the OUTPUT
> and CAPTURE formats should be already set, so it should be
> possible to validate the SPS at TRY_EXT_CTRLS, using
> v4l2_ctrl_ops.try_ctrl.

I was not sure how to access the rkvdec_ctx from v4l2_ctrl_ops.try_ctrl
so I went with similar approach as was done in the VP9 series, looks like
we can use container_of and ctrl->handler to find rkvdec_ctx.

Will try to move the validation into rkvdec_try_ctrl for v2.

Regards,
Jonas

>
> That would be much better, since once the application
> calls STREAMON on both queues, I think things are
> expected to be validated as much as possible.
>
> Thanks,
> Ezequiel
>
>> + dev_err(ctx->dev->dev,
>> + "unexpected bitstream resolution %ux%u\n",
>> + width, height);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int rkvdec_h264_run_preamble(struct rkvdec_ctx *ctx,
>> + struct rkvdec_h264_run *run)
>> {
>> struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl;
>> + int ret;
>>
>> ctrl = v4l2_ctrl_find(&ctx->ctrl_hdl,
>> V4L2_CID_MPEG_VIDEO_H264_DECODE_PARAMS);
>> @@ -1080,6 +1103,12 @@ static void rkvdec_h264_run_preamble(struct rkvdec_ctx *ctx,
>> run->scaling_matrix = ctrl ? ctrl->p_cur.p : NULL;
>>
>> rkvdec_run_preamble(ctx, &run->base);
>> +
>> + ret = validate_sps(ctx, run->sps);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> }
>>
>> static int rkvdec_h264_run(struct rkvdec_ctx *ctx)
>> @@ -1088,8 +1117,13 @@ static int rkvdec_h264_run(struct rkvdec_ctx *ctx)
>> struct rkvdec_dev *rkvdec = ctx->dev;
>> struct rkvdec_h264_ctx *h264_ctx = ctx->priv;
>> struct rkvdec_h264_run run;
>> + int ret;
>>
>> - rkvdec_h264_run_preamble(ctx, &run);
>> + ret = rkvdec_h264_run_preamble(ctx, &run);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + rkvdec_run_postamble(ctx, &run.base);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>>
>> /* Build the P/B{0,1} ref lists. */
>> v4l2_h264_init_reflist_builder(&reflist_builder, run.decode_params,
>
>