On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 11:44:19AM -0500, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> This series corrects two issues related to enablement of interrupts in
> response to interception of the PQAP(AQIC) command:
...
Hi Tony!
Via which tree this series is to be pulled?
Thanks!
Am 15.11.23 um 15:29 schrieb Alexander Gordeev:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 11:44:19AM -0500, Tony Krowiak wrote:
>> This series corrects two issues related to enablement of interrupts in
>> response to interception of the PQAP(AQIC) command:
> ...
>
> Hi Tony!
>
> Via which tree this series is to be pulled?
>
> Thanks!
I wanted to create a topic repository/branch for s390-specfic vfio code when we expect conflicts or touch kvm or vfio base code.
I started that but I have not finished my preparations.
Given the diffstat:
drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 12 ++++++++----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
This looks pretty much isolated to s390, so unless Paolo or Alex complain,
we should simply carry that via the s390 tree.
Alexander, can you take those patches?
Tony, I assume none if the patches is urgent and can wait for the next merge window, correct?
Christian
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 04:31:49PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Alexander, can you take those patches?
Applied, thanks!
> Christian
On 11/17/23 10:31, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am 15.11.23 um 15:29 schrieb Alexander Gordeev:
>> On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 11:44:19AM -0500, Tony Krowiak wrote:
>>> This series corrects two issues related to enablement of interrupts in
>>> response to interception of the PQAP(AQIC) command:
>> ...
>>
>> Hi Tony!
>>
>> Via which tree this series is to be pulled?
>>
>> Thanks!
>
> I wanted to create a topic repository/branch for s390-specfic vfio code
> when we expect conflicts or touch kvm or vfio base code.
> I started that but I have not finished my preparations.
>
> Given the diffstat:
> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> This looks pretty much isolated to s390, so unless Paolo or Alex complain,
> we should simply carry that via the s390 tree.
> Alexander, can you take those patches?
> Tony, I assume none if the patches is urgent and can wait for the next
> merge window, correct?
It is not urgent.
>
> Christian