On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Roland Dreier <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Steve Wise <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Seems like the subject lines in each patch are getting truncated?
> Yes, truncated in patchwork too -- for example:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4292461/
>
> Please fix and resend.
Roland, from quick looking on this series of fifteen patches, only 1/3
of them (4/5/12/14) have non-empty change-log. I would expect kernel
work which goes upstream through linux-rdma to use a bit of higher
standards, agree?
Selvin, can you sit down and come up with change-logs to your driver updates?
Or.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Or Gerlitz [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 1:15 AM
> To: Roland Dreier; Selvin Xavier
> Cc: Steve Wise; [email protected]; linux-kernel
> Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 00/15] Bug fixes for ocrdma driver
>
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Roland Dreier <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Steve Wise
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Seems like the subject lines in each patch are getting truncated?
> > Yes, truncated in patchwork too -- for example:
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4292461/
> >
> > Please fix and resend.
>
> Roland, from quick looking on this series of fifteen patches, only 1/3 of them
> (4/5/12/14) have non-empty change-log. I would expect kernel work which
> goes upstream through linux-rdma to use a bit of higher standards, agree?
>
> Selvin, can you sit down and come up with change-logs to your driver
> updates?
>
> Or.
Or,
Sure, I will post v1 patch set with proper change-logs.
Thanks,
Selvin Xavier
????{.n?+???????+%?????ݶ??w??{.n?+????{??G?????{ay? ʇڙ?,j??f???h?????????z_??(?階?ݢj"???m??????G????????????&???~???iO???z??v?^?m???? ????????I?