As it was pointed out by Yonghong Song [1], in the bpf selftests the use
of the ASSERT_* series of macros is preferred over the CHECK macro.
This patch replaces all CHECK calls in bpf_iter with the appropriate
ASSERT_* macros.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
Suggested-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Yuran Pereira <[email protected]>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c | 82 +++++++++----------
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
index 1f02168103dd..7db6972ed952 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
@@ -34,8 +34,6 @@
#include "bpf_iter_ksym.skel.h"
#include "bpf_iter_sockmap.skel.h"
-static int duration;
-
static void test_btf_id_or_null(void)
{
struct bpf_iter_test_kern3 *skel;
@@ -64,7 +62,7 @@ static void do_dummy_read_opts(struct bpf_program *prog, struct bpf_iter_attach_
/* not check contents, but ensure read() ends without error */
while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0)
;
- CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno));
+ ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read");
close(iter_fd);
@@ -413,7 +411,7 @@ static int do_btf_read(struct bpf_iter_task_btf *skel)
goto free_link;
}
- if (CHECK(err < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(err, 0, "read"))
goto free_link;
ASSERT_HAS_SUBSTR(taskbuf, "(struct task_struct)",
@@ -526,11 +524,11 @@ static int do_read_with_fd(int iter_fd, const char *expected,
start = 0;
while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf + start, read_buf_len)) > 0) {
start += len;
- if (CHECK(start >= 16, "read", "read len %d\n", len))
+ if (!ASSERT_LT(start, 16, "read"))
return -1;
read_buf_len = read_one_char ? 1 : 16 - start;
}
- if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
return -1;
if (!ASSERT_STREQ(buf, expected, "read"))
@@ -571,8 +569,7 @@ static int do_read(const char *path, const char *expected)
int err, iter_fd;
iter_fd = open(path, O_RDONLY);
- if (CHECK(iter_fd < 0, "open", "open %s failed: %s\n",
- path, strerror(errno)))
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(iter_fd, 0, "open"))
return -1;
err = do_read_with_fd(iter_fd, expected, false);
@@ -600,7 +597,7 @@ static void test_file_iter(void)
unlink(path);
err = bpf_link__pin(link, path);
- if (CHECK(err, "pin_iter", "pin_iter to %s failed: %d\n", path, err))
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "pin_iter"))
goto free_link;
err = do_read(path, "abcd");
@@ -651,12 +648,10 @@ static void test_overflow(bool test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1)
* overflow and needs restart.
*/
map1_fd = bpf_map_create(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, NULL, 4, 8, 1, NULL);
- if (CHECK(map1_fd < 0, "bpf_map_create",
- "map_creation failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(map1_fd, 0, "bpf_map_create"))
goto out;
map2_fd = bpf_map_create(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, NULL, 4, 8, 1, NULL);
- if (CHECK(map2_fd < 0, "bpf_map_create",
- "map_creation failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(map2_fd, 0, "bpf_map_create"))
goto free_map1;
/* bpf_seq_printf kernel buffer is 8 pages, so one map
@@ -685,14 +680,12 @@ static void test_overflow(bool test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1)
/* setup filtering map_id in bpf program */
map_info_len = sizeof(map_info);
err = bpf_map_get_info_by_fd(map1_fd, &map_info, &map_info_len);
- if (CHECK(err, "get_map_info", "get map info failed: %s\n",
- strerror(errno)))
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "get_map_info"))
goto free_map2;
skel->bss->map1_id = map_info.id;
err = bpf_map_get_info_by_fd(map2_fd, &map_info, &map_info_len);
- if (CHECK(err, "get_map_info", "get map info failed: %s\n",
- strerror(errno)))
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "get_map_info"))
goto free_map2;
skel->bss->map2_id = map_info.id;
@@ -714,16 +707,15 @@ static void test_overflow(bool test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1)
while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, expected_read_len)) > 0)
total_read_len += len;
- CHECK(len != -1 || errno != E2BIG, "read",
- "expected ret -1, errno E2BIG, but get ret %d, error %s\n",
- len, strerror(errno));
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(len, -1, "read"))
+ goto free_buf;
+ ASSERT_EQ(errno, E2BIG, "read");
goto free_buf;
} else if (!ret1) {
while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, expected_read_len)) > 0)
total_read_len += len;
- if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n",
- strerror(errno)))
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
goto free_buf;
} else {
do {
@@ -732,8 +724,7 @@ static void test_overflow(bool test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1)
total_read_len += len;
} while (len > 0 || len == -EAGAIN);
- if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n",
- strerror(errno)))
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
goto free_buf;
}
@@ -836,7 +827,7 @@ static void test_bpf_hash_map(void)
/* do some tests */
while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0)
;
- if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
goto close_iter;
/* test results */
@@ -917,7 +908,7 @@ static void test_bpf_percpu_hash_map(void)
/* do some tests */
while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0)
;
- if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
goto close_iter;
/* test results */
@@ -983,17 +974,15 @@ static void test_bpf_array_map(void)
start = 0;
while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf + start, sizeof(buf) - start)) > 0)
start += len;
- if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
goto close_iter;
/* test results */
res_first_key = *(__u32 *)buf;
res_first_val = *(__u64 *)(buf + sizeof(__u32));
- if (CHECK(res_first_key != 0 || res_first_val != first_val,
- "bpf_seq_write",
- "seq_write failure: first key %u vs expected 0, "
- " first value %llu vs expected %llu\n",
- res_first_key, res_first_val, first_val))
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(res_first_key, 0, "bpf_seq_write"))
+ goto close_iter;
+ else if (!ASSERT_EQ(res_first_val, first_val, "bpf_seq_write"))
goto close_iter;
if (!ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->key_sum, expected_key, "key_sum"))
@@ -1092,7 +1081,7 @@ static void test_bpf_percpu_array_map(void)
/* do some tests */
while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0)
;
- if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
goto close_iter;
/* test results */
@@ -1131,6 +1120,7 @@ static void test_bpf_sk_storage_delete(void)
sock_fd = socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
if (!ASSERT_GE(sock_fd, 0, "socket"))
goto out;
+
err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &sock_fd, &val, BPF_NOEXIST);
if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "map_update"))
goto out;
@@ -1151,14 +1141,20 @@ static void test_bpf_sk_storage_delete(void)
/* do some tests */
while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0)
;
- if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
goto close_iter;
/* test results */
err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &sock_fd, &val);
- if (CHECK(!err || errno != ENOENT, "bpf_map_lookup_elem",
- "map value wasn't deleted (err=%d, errno=%d)\n", err, errno))
+
+ /* Note: The following assertions serve to ensure
+ * the value was deleted. It does so by asserting
+ * that bpf_map_lookup_elem has failed. This might
+ * seem counterintuitivei at first.
+ */
+ if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "bpf_map_lookup_elem"))
goto close_iter;
+ ASSERT_EQ(errno, ENOENT, "bpf_map_lookup_elem");
close_iter:
close(iter_fd);
@@ -1203,17 +1199,17 @@ static void test_bpf_sk_storage_get(void)
do_dummy_read(skel->progs.fill_socket_owner);
err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &sock_fd, &val);
- if (CHECK(err || val != getpid(), "bpf_map_lookup_elem",
- "map value wasn't set correctly (expected %d, got %d, err=%d)\n",
- getpid(), val, err))
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_lookup_elem"))
+ goto close_socket;
+ else if (!ASSERT_EQ(val, getpid(), "bpf_map_lookup_elem"))
goto close_socket;
do_dummy_read(skel->progs.negate_socket_local_storage);
err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &sock_fd, &val);
- CHECK(err || val != -getpid(), "bpf_map_lookup_elem",
- "map value wasn't set correctly (expected %d, got %d, err=%d)\n",
- -getpid(), val, err);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_lookup_elem"))
+ goto close_socket;
+ ASSERT_EQ(val, -getpid(), "bpf_map_lookup_elem");
close_socket:
close(sock_fd);
@@ -1290,7 +1286,7 @@ static void test_bpf_sk_storage_map(void)
/* do some tests */
while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0)
;
- if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
goto close_iter;
/* test results */
--
2.25.1
On 10/25/23 19:03, Yuran Pereira wrote:
> As it was pointed out by Yonghong Song [1], in the bpf selftests the use
> of the ASSERT_* series of macros is preferred over the CHECK macro.
> This patch replaces all CHECK calls in bpf_iter with the appropriate
> ASSERT_* macros.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
>
> Suggested-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Yuran Pereira <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c | 82 +++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
> index 1f02168103dd..7db6972ed952 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
> @@ -34,8 +34,6 @@
> #include "bpf_iter_ksym.skel.h"
> #include "bpf_iter_sockmap.skel.h"
>
> -static int duration;
> -
> static void test_btf_id_or_null(void)
> {
> struct bpf_iter_test_kern3 *skel;
> @@ -64,7 +62,7 @@ static void do_dummy_read_opts(struct bpf_program *prog, struct bpf_iter_attach_
> /* not check contents, but ensure read() ends without error */
> while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0)
> ;
> - CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno));
> + ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read");
>
> close(iter_fd);
>
> @@ -413,7 +411,7 @@ static int do_btf_read(struct bpf_iter_task_btf *skel)
> goto free_link;
> }
>
> - if (CHECK(err < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
> + if (!ASSERT_GE(err, 0, "read"))
> goto free_link;
>
> ASSERT_HAS_SUBSTR(taskbuf, "(struct task_struct)",
> @@ -526,11 +524,11 @@ static int do_read_with_fd(int iter_fd, const char *expected,
> start = 0;
> while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf + start, read_buf_len)) > 0) {
> start += len;
> - if (CHECK(start >= 16, "read", "read len %d\n", len))
> + if (!ASSERT_LT(start, 16, "read"))
> return -1;
> read_buf_len = read_one_char ? 1 : 16 - start;
> }
> - if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
> + if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
> return -1;
>
> if (!ASSERT_STREQ(buf, expected, "read"))
> @@ -571,8 +569,7 @@ static int do_read(const char *path, const char *expected)
> int err, iter_fd;
>
> iter_fd = open(path, O_RDONLY);
> - if (CHECK(iter_fd < 0, "open", "open %s failed: %s\n",
> - path, strerror(errno)))
> + if (!ASSERT_GE(iter_fd, 0, "open"))
> return -1;
>
> err = do_read_with_fd(iter_fd, expected, false);
> @@ -600,7 +597,7 @@ static void test_file_iter(void)
> unlink(path);
>
> err = bpf_link__pin(link, path);
> - if (CHECK(err, "pin_iter", "pin_iter to %s failed: %d\n", path, err))
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "pin_iter"))
> goto free_link;
>
> err = do_read(path, "abcd");
> @@ -651,12 +648,10 @@ static void test_overflow(bool test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1)
> * overflow and needs restart.
> */
> map1_fd = bpf_map_create(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, NULL, 4, 8, 1, NULL);
> - if (CHECK(map1_fd < 0, "bpf_map_create",
> - "map_creation failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
> + if (!ASSERT_GE(map1_fd, 0, "bpf_map_create"))
> goto out;
> map2_fd = bpf_map_create(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, NULL, 4, 8, 1, NULL);
> - if (CHECK(map2_fd < 0, "bpf_map_create",
> - "map_creation failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
> + if (!ASSERT_GE(map2_fd, 0, "bpf_map_create"))
> goto free_map1;
>
> /* bpf_seq_printf kernel buffer is 8 pages, so one map
> @@ -685,14 +680,12 @@ static void test_overflow(bool test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1)
> /* setup filtering map_id in bpf program */
> map_info_len = sizeof(map_info);
> err = bpf_map_get_info_by_fd(map1_fd, &map_info, &map_info_len);
> - if (CHECK(err, "get_map_info", "get map info failed: %s\n",
> - strerror(errno)))
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "get_map_info"))
> goto free_map2;
> skel->bss->map1_id = map_info.id;
>
> err = bpf_map_get_info_by_fd(map2_fd, &map_info, &map_info_len);
> - if (CHECK(err, "get_map_info", "get map info failed: %s\n",
> - strerror(errno)))
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "get_map_info"))
> goto free_map2;
> skel->bss->map2_id = map_info.id;
>
> @@ -714,16 +707,15 @@ static void test_overflow(bool test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1)
> while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, expected_read_len)) > 0)
> total_read_len += len;
>
> - CHECK(len != -1 || errno != E2BIG, "read",
> - "expected ret -1, errno E2BIG, but get ret %d, error %s\n",
> - len, strerror(errno));
> + if (!ASSERT_EQ(len, -1, "read"))
> + goto free_buf;
> + ASSERT_EQ(errno, E2BIG, "read");
I think you can just do
ASSERT_EQ(len, -1, "read");
ASSERT_EQ(errno, E2BG, "read");
without a check here.
WDYT?
> goto free_buf;
> } else if (!ret1) {
> while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, expected_read_len)) > 0)
> total_read_len += len;
>
> - if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n",
> - strerror(errno)))
> + if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
> goto free_buf;
> } else {
> do {
> @@ -732,8 +724,7 @@ static void test_overflow(bool test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1)
> total_read_len += len;
> } while (len > 0 || len == -EAGAIN);
>
> - if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n",
> - strerror(errno)))
> + if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
> goto free_buf;
> }
>
> @@ -836,7 +827,7 @@ static void test_bpf_hash_map(void)
> /* do some tests */
> while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0)
> ;
> - if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
> + if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
> goto close_iter;
>
> /* test results */
> @@ -917,7 +908,7 @@ static void test_bpf_percpu_hash_map(void)
> /* do some tests */
> while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0)
> ;
> - if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
> + if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
> goto close_iter;
>
> /* test results */
> @@ -983,17 +974,15 @@ static void test_bpf_array_map(void)
> start = 0;
> while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf + start, sizeof(buf) - start)) > 0)
> start += len;
> - if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
> + if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
> goto close_iter;
>
> /* test results */
> res_first_key = *(__u32 *)buf;
> res_first_val = *(__u64 *)(buf + sizeof(__u32));
> - if (CHECK(res_first_key != 0 || res_first_val != first_val,
> - "bpf_seq_write",
> - "seq_write failure: first key %u vs expected 0, "
> - " first value %llu vs expected %llu\n",
> - res_first_key, res_first_val, first_val))
> + if (!ASSERT_EQ(res_first_key, 0, "bpf_seq_write"))
> + goto close_iter;
> + else if (!ASSERT_EQ(res_first_val, first_val, "bpf_seq_write"))
> goto close_iter;
Similiar here!
if (!ASSERT_EQ(...) ||
!ASSERT_EQ(...))
goto close_iter;
>
> if (!ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->key_sum, expected_key, "key_sum"))
> @@ -1092,7 +1081,7 @@ static void test_bpf_percpu_array_map(void)
> /* do some tests */
> while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0)
> ;
> - if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
> + if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
> goto close_iter;
>
> /* test results */
> @@ -1131,6 +1120,7 @@ static void test_bpf_sk_storage_delete(void)
> sock_fd = socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
> if (!ASSERT_GE(sock_fd, 0, "socket"))
> goto out;
> +
> err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &sock_fd, &val, BPF_NOEXIST);
> if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "map_update"))
> goto out;
> @@ -1151,14 +1141,20 @@ static void test_bpf_sk_storage_delete(void)
> /* do some tests */
> while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0)
> ;
> - if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
> + if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
> goto close_iter;
>
> /* test results */
> err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &sock_fd, &val);
> - if (CHECK(!err || errno != ENOENT, "bpf_map_lookup_elem",
> - "map value wasn't deleted (err=%d, errno=%d)\n", err, errno))
> +
> + /* Note: The following assertions serve to ensure
> + * the value was deleted. It does so by asserting
> + * that bpf_map_lookup_elem has failed. This might
> + * seem counterintuitivei at first.
> + */
> + if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "bpf_map_lookup_elem"))
> goto close_iter;
> + ASSERT_EQ(errno, ENOENT, "bpf_map_lookup_elem");
Same! Two consecutive ASSERT_*()s should be good.
>
> close_iter:
> close(iter_fd);
> @@ -1203,17 +1199,17 @@ static void test_bpf_sk_storage_get(void)
> do_dummy_read(skel->progs.fill_socket_owner);
>
> err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &sock_fd, &val);
> - if (CHECK(err || val != getpid(), "bpf_map_lookup_elem",
> - "map value wasn't set correctly (expected %d, got %d, err=%d)\n",
> - getpid(), val, err))
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_lookup_elem"))
> + goto close_socket;
> + else if (!ASSERT_EQ(val, getpid(), "bpf_map_lookup_elem"))
> goto close_socket;
>
Same, !ASSERT_OK(..) || !ASSERT_EQ(...)
> do_dummy_read(skel->progs.negate_socket_local_storage);
>
> err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &sock_fd, &val);
> - CHECK(err || val != -getpid(), "bpf_map_lookup_elem",
> - "map value wasn't set correctly (expected %d, got %d, err=%d)\n",
> - -getpid(), val, err);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_lookup_elem"))
> + goto close_socket;
> + ASSERT_EQ(val, -getpid(), "bpf_map_lookup_elem");
Two consecutive ASSERT_*()s should be good.
>
> close_socket:
> close(sock_fd);
> @@ -1290,7 +1286,7 @@ static void test_bpf_sk_storage_map(void)
> /* do some tests */
> while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0)
> ;
> - if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
> + if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
> goto close_iter;
>
> /* test results */
On 10/25/23 9:33 PM, Kui-Feng Lee wrote:
>
>
> On 10/25/23 19:03, Yuran Pereira wrote:
>> As it was pointed out by Yonghong Song [1], in the bpf selftests the use
>> of the ASSERT_* series of macros is preferred over the CHECK macro.
>> This patch replaces all CHECK calls in bpf_iter with the appropriate
>> ASSERT_* macros.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
>>
>> Suggested-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Yuran Pereira <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c | 82 +++++++++----------
>> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
>> b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
>> index 1f02168103dd..7db6972ed952 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
>> @@ -34,8 +34,6 @@
>> #include "bpf_iter_ksym.skel.h"
>> #include "bpf_iter_sockmap.skel.h"
>> -static int duration;
>> -
>> static void test_btf_id_or_null(void)
>> {
>> struct bpf_iter_test_kern3 *skel;
>> @@ -64,7 +62,7 @@ static void do_dummy_read_opts(struct bpf_program
>> *prog, struct bpf_iter_attach_
>> /* not check contents, but ensure read() ends without error */
>> while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0)
>> ;
>> - CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno));
>> + ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read");
>> close(iter_fd);
>> @@ -413,7 +411,7 @@ static int do_btf_read(struct bpf_iter_task_btf
>> *skel)
>> goto free_link;
>> }
>> - if (CHECK(err < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
>> + if (!ASSERT_GE(err, 0, "read"))
>> goto free_link;
>> ASSERT_HAS_SUBSTR(taskbuf, "(struct task_struct)",
>> @@ -526,11 +524,11 @@ static int do_read_with_fd(int iter_fd, const
>> char *expected,
>> start = 0;
>> while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf + start, read_buf_len)) > 0) {
>> start += len;
>> - if (CHECK(start >= 16, "read", "read len %d\n", len))
>> + if (!ASSERT_LT(start, 16, "read"))
>> return -1;
>> read_buf_len = read_one_char ? 1 : 16 - start;
>> }
>> - if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
>> + if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
>> return -1;
>> if (!ASSERT_STREQ(buf, expected, "read"))
>> @@ -571,8 +569,7 @@ static int do_read(const char *path, const char
>> *expected)
>> int err, iter_fd;
>> iter_fd = open(path, O_RDONLY);
>> - if (CHECK(iter_fd < 0, "open", "open %s failed: %s\n",
>> - path, strerror(errno)))
>> + if (!ASSERT_GE(iter_fd, 0, "open"))
>> return -1;
>> err = do_read_with_fd(iter_fd, expected, false);
>> @@ -600,7 +597,7 @@ static void test_file_iter(void)
>> unlink(path);
>> err = bpf_link__pin(link, path);
>> - if (CHECK(err, "pin_iter", "pin_iter to %s failed: %d\n", path,
>> err))
>> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "pin_iter"))
>> goto free_link;
>> err = do_read(path, "abcd");
>> @@ -651,12 +648,10 @@ static void test_overflow(bool
>> test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1)
>> * overflow and needs restart.
>> */
>> map1_fd = bpf_map_create(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, NULL, 4, 8, 1, NULL);
>> - if (CHECK(map1_fd < 0, "bpf_map_create",
>> - "map_creation failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
>> + if (!ASSERT_GE(map1_fd, 0, "bpf_map_create"))
>> goto out;
>> map2_fd = bpf_map_create(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, NULL, 4, 8, 1, NULL);
>> - if (CHECK(map2_fd < 0, "bpf_map_create",
>> - "map_creation failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
>> + if (!ASSERT_GE(map2_fd, 0, "bpf_map_create"))
>> goto free_map1;
>> /* bpf_seq_printf kernel buffer is 8 pages, so one map
>> @@ -685,14 +680,12 @@ static void test_overflow(bool
>> test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1)
>> /* setup filtering map_id in bpf program */
>> map_info_len = sizeof(map_info);
>> err = bpf_map_get_info_by_fd(map1_fd, &map_info, &map_info_len);
>> - if (CHECK(err, "get_map_info", "get map info failed: %s\n",
>> - strerror(errno)))
>> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "get_map_info"))
>> goto free_map2;
>> skel->bss->map1_id = map_info.id;
>> err = bpf_map_get_info_by_fd(map2_fd, &map_info, &map_info_len);
>> - if (CHECK(err, "get_map_info", "get map info failed: %s\n",
>> - strerror(errno)))
>> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "get_map_info"))
>> goto free_map2;
>> skel->bss->map2_id = map_info.id;
>> @@ -714,16 +707,15 @@ static void test_overflow(bool
>> test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1)
>> while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, expected_read_len)) > 0)
>> total_read_len += len;
>> - CHECK(len != -1 || errno != E2BIG, "read",
>> - "expected ret -1, errno E2BIG, but get ret %d, error
>> %s\n",
>> - len, strerror(errno));
>> + if (!ASSERT_EQ(len, -1, "read"))
>> + goto free_buf;
>> + ASSERT_EQ(errno, E2BIG, "read");
>
> I think you can just do
>
> ASSERT_EQ(len, -1, "read");
> ASSERT_EQ(errno, E2BG, "read");
>
> without a check here.
> WDYT?
Many recent selftests have ASSERT_* similar to what Kui-Feng is suggested.
So I think it is okay to do adjustment like it. The same for some other suggestions
below.
But since this patch intends to convert CHECK to ASSERT_*, so other possible
'optimizations' like above ASSERT_EQ can stay as is since they do not really
affect functionality.
In the next revision, please put three patches 0/2, 1/2 and 2/2 together as a single
patch set. Thanks.
>
>> goto free_buf;
>> } else if (!ret1) {
>> while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, expected_read_len)) > 0)
>> total_read_len += len;
>> - if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n",
>> - strerror(errno)))
>> + if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
>> goto free_buf;
>> } else {
>> do {
>> @@ -732,8 +724,7 @@ static void test_overflow(bool
>> test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1)
>> total_read_len += len;
>> } while (len > 0 || len == -EAGAIN);
>> - if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n",
>> - strerror(errno)))
>> + if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
>> goto free_buf;
>> }
>> @@ -836,7 +827,7 @@ static void test_bpf_hash_map(void)
>> /* do some tests */
>> while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0)
>> ;
>> - if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
>> + if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
>> goto close_iter;
>> /* test results */
>> @@ -917,7 +908,7 @@ static void test_bpf_percpu_hash_map(void)
>> /* do some tests */
>> while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0)
>> ;
>> - if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
>> + if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
>> goto close_iter;
>> /* test results */
>> @@ -983,17 +974,15 @@ static void test_bpf_array_map(void)
>> start = 0;
>> while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf + start, sizeof(buf) - start))
>> > 0)
>> start += len;
>> - if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
>> + if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
>> goto close_iter;
>> /* test results */
>> res_first_key = *(__u32 *)buf;
>> res_first_val = *(__u64 *)(buf + sizeof(__u32));
>> - if (CHECK(res_first_key != 0 || res_first_val != first_val,
>> - "bpf_seq_write",
>> - "seq_write failure: first key %u vs expected 0, "
>> - " first value %llu vs expected %llu\n",
>> - res_first_key, res_first_val, first_val))
>> + if (!ASSERT_EQ(res_first_key, 0, "bpf_seq_write"))
>> + goto close_iter;
>> + else if (!ASSERT_EQ(res_first_val, first_val, "bpf_seq_write"))
>> goto close_iter;
>
> Similiar here!
>
> if (!ASSERT_EQ(...) ||
> !ASSERT_EQ(...))
> goto close_iter;
>
> [...]