Dear Kernel Gurus
Sorry if this is a bit of a repeat - I think the prior message was
incorrectly addressed.
System Dual 500 Mhz Pentium III 256MB ram with Adaptec 2940
UW scsi controller - WD disc and HP DAT tape.
I have been getting kernel panics when doing backups over the
network. I have used both the eepro100 driver and Intel's e100 driver
the general type of error is a panic - Aiee -- killing the interrupt
driver.
I have tried the 2.4.0, 2.4.1 and lately the 2.2.2-pre2 kernels.
Panics below for 2.4.2-pre2 kernel.
The error I have got is spkput:over: d0826d4b put:1514 dev:eth0
kernel BUG at skbuff.c:93 using the e100 driver
The NIC is an Intel Ether ExpressPro 100 set to 100Mbs full duplex
connected to an HP2424M switch.
I switched to the eepro100 drive and got this panic with system
"idle" and I was typing sudo -s.
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 18000080
Bad EIP value. Killing the interrupt handler.
Any ideas?
Stephen Carr
-----------------
Computing Officer
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
University of Adelaide
Adelaide, South Australia,
Australia 5005
Phone +618 8303-4313
Fax +618 8303-4359
Email [email protected]
-----------------------------------------------------------
This email message is intended only for the addressee(s)
and contains information which may be confidential and/or
copyright. If you are not the intended recipient please
do not read, save, forward, disclose, or copy the contents
of this email. If this email has been sent to you in error,
please notify the sender by reply email and delete this
email and any copies or links to this email completely and
immediately from your system. No representation is made
that this email is free of viruses. Virus scanning is
recommended and is the responsibility of the recipient.
> Panics below for 2.4.2-pre2 kernel.
>
> The error I have got is spkput:over: d0826d4b put:1514 dev:eth0
> kernel BUG at skbuff.c:93 using the e100 driver
Replace the e100 driver with the standard eepro100 driver we ship with the
kernel. You might also want to try 2.4.1-ac9 once it appears with 2.4.2-pre2
merged into it and the aic7xxx update.
Hi all,
I don't really now if my problem is related with this one, and I
(unfortunetly) don't have any Oops output to show - sorry 'bout that.
I'm even not sure this report will be helpful but... anyway
I'm currently running Linux amethyste 2.4.1-ac2 #1 Mon Feb 5 20:38:39
CET 2001 i686 on a Compaq DL360, compiled with recommended (egcs 1.1.2
release).
I need 2.4.x for netfilter and I'm currently doing MASQ, NAT and packet
filtering.
I've tried 2.4.0-test12; 2.4.0; 2.4.1; without beiing able to get a
>10 days uptime. The problem is always the same one :
"sshing" my router box, then detarring a big tar.gz archive (such as
egcs-xxx.tar.gz) make randomly oops my kernel (gzip is always the
"faulty" process causing the Oops).
Sorry, but I haven't any Oops since it's a production machine, and I
couldn't take the time to copy the Oops by hand.
UP 100/550 PIII processor, 128M of ram
lspci :
00:00.0 Host bridge: ServerWorks CNB20HE (rev 05)
00:00.1 Host bridge: ServerWorks CNB20HE (rev 05)
00:01.0 RAID bus controller: Symbios Logic Inc. (formerly NCR): Unknown
device 0010 (rev 02)
00:03.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage IIC
215IIC [Mach64 GT IIC] (rev 7a)
00:04.0 System peripheral: Compaq Computer Corporation Advanced System
Management Controller
00:05.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c905C-TX [Fast Etherlink]
(rev 74)
00:0f.0 ISA bridge: ServerWorks OSB4 (rev 4f)
00:0f.1 IDE interface: ServerWorks: Unknown device 0211
03:04.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82557 [Ethernet Pro 100]
(rev 08)
03:05.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82557 [Ethernet Pro 100]
(rev 08)
Unfortunetly, 2 intel NIC onboard :-(
-uptime:
4:58pm up 3 days, 4:57, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
This machine acts as a router.
-RedHat 7.0 without any upgrade (bad glibc) with kernels
2.4.0-test12; 2.4.0; 2.4.1
-RedHat 7.0 with upgrades with 2.4.1-ac2
-glibc 2.2.1 installed by hand
-all recommended software in linux/Documentation/Changes
*Here is my question* :
-Does the glibc version has an impact on the kernel' stability?
Thanks for your time,
b.
Stephen Carr wrote:
> Dear Kernel Gurus
>
> Sorry if this is a bit of a repeat - I think the prior message was
> incorrectly addressed.
>
> System Dual 500 Mhz Pentium III 256MB ram with Adaptec 2940
> UW scsi controller - WD disc and HP DAT tape.
>
> I have been getting kernel panics when doing backups over the
> network. I have used both the eepro100 driver and Intel's e100 driver
> the general type of error is a panic - Aiee -- killing the interrupt
> driver.
>
> I have tried the 2.4.0, 2.4.1 and lately the 2.2.2-pre2 kernels.
>
> Panics below for 2.4.2-pre2 kernel.
>
> The error I have got is spkput:over: d0826d4b put:1514 dev:eth0
> kernel BUG at skbuff.c:93 using the e100 driver
>
> The NIC is an Intel Ether ExpressPro 100 set to 100Mbs full duplex
> connected to an HP2424M switch.
>
> I switched to the eepro100 drive and got this panic with system
> "idle" and I was typing sudo -s.
>
> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 18000080
> Bad EIP value. Killing the interrupt handler.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Stephen Carr
>
>
> -----------------
> Computing Officer
> Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
> University of Adelaide
> Adelaide, South Australia,
> Australia 5005
> Phone +618 8303-4313
> Fax +618 8303-4359
> Email [email protected]
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This email message is intended only for the addressee(s)
> and contains information which may be confidential and/or
> copyright. If you are not the intended recipient please
> do not read, save, forward, disclose, or copy the contents
> of this email. If this email has been sent to you in error,
> please notify the sender by reply email and delete this
> email and any copies or links to this email completely and
> immediately from your system. No representation is made
> that this email is free of viruses. Virus scanning is
> recommended and is the responsibility of the recipient.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
Mark Hahn wrote:
>> I'm currently running Linux amethyste 2.4.1-ac2 #1 Mon Feb 5 20:38:39
>
>
> there are well-known problems on SW boards with most recent 2.4 kernels.
What are these well-known problems?
>
>
>> -Does the glibc version has an impact on the kernel' stability?
>
>
> none.
>
>
>