Kernel 2.4.13-pre4
make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/linux/drivers/message/i2o'
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/local/src/linux/include -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer
-fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2
-march=i586 -DEXPORT_SYMTAB -c i2o_pci.c
i2o_pci.c: In function `i2o_pci_install':
i2o_pci.c:165: structure has no member named `pdev'
...
c->bus.pci.irq = -1;
c->bus.pci.queue_buggy = 0;
c->bus.pci.dpt = 0;
c->bus.pci.short_req = 0;
c->bus.pci.pdev = dev;
Has someone already fixed this before I start digging?
David
It looks like this has been an issue since -pre1 -- we've seen this too
with i2o as a module. Between .11 and the parport issue with .12, it's
certainly been interesting recently. :)
Anyone have any news on this? Sorry if I've missed it.
Thanks much,
--
Ken.
[email protected]
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 05:08:18PM -0400, David Ford wrote:
| Kernel 2.4.13-pre4
|
| make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/linux/drivers/message/i2o'
| gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/local/src/linux/include -Wall
| -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer
| -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2
| -march=i586 -DEXPORT_SYMTAB -c i2o_pci.c
| i2o_pci.c: In function `i2o_pci_install':
| i2o_pci.c:165: structure has no member named `pdev'
|
| ...
| c->bus.pci.irq = -1;
| c->bus.pci.queue_buggy = 0;
| c->bus.pci.dpt = 0;
| c->bus.pci.short_req = 0;
| c->bus.pci.pdev = dev;
|
| Has someone already fixed this before I start digging?
|
| David
|
|
| -
| To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
| the body of a message to [email protected]
| More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
According to a few posts the last few days, it's part of an incomplete
merge betwixt -ac and linus. I assume it will get completed shortly.
David
Ken Brownfield wrote:
>It looks like this has been an issue since -pre1 -- we've seen this too
>with i2o as a module. Between .11 and the parport issue with .12, it's
>certainly been interesting recently. :)
>
>Anyone have any news on this? Sorry if I've missed it.
>
>Thanks much,
>
> It looks like this has been an issue since -pre1 -- we've seen this too
> with i2o as a module. Between .11 and the parport issue with .12, it's
> certainly been interesting recently. :)
> Anyone have any news on this? Sorry if I've missed it.
Its broken until I finish merging the i2o changes with Linus. Its ok in the
-ac tree and indeed you can use the -ac changes to get to where I should be
merge dwith Linus