Hi follows,
I'm getting in troubles with a A7M266-D motherboard with two
Athlon XP 1800 cpus (yes, XP not MP!).
Following the screen shot of my problem:
^-------cut here---------^
EIP: 0010:[<c0111686>] Not tainted
EFLAGS: 00011046
<4>CPU: 1
<4>CPU: 1
EIP: 0010:[<c0111686>] Not tainted
EFLAGS: 00011046
`u!wisuu`m aeesess 7eg111eg
printing eip:
printing eip:
*pde = 11111010
Stuck ??
CPU #1 not responding - cannot use it.
Error: only one processor found.
ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs
Setting 2 in the phys_id_present_map
...changing IO-APIC physical APIC ID to 2 ... ok.
init IO_APIC IRQs
IO-APIC (apicid-pin) 2-10, 2-11, 2-12, 2-13, 2-16, 2-17, 2-20, 2-21, 2-22,
2-23 not connected.
..TIMER: vector=0x31 pin1=2 pin2=0
^-----cut here-----^
After spend some times put printk's in kernel source like "Reach this point!"
I was trying disable IO_APIC in .config file but some link erros ocurred.
Has any way to turn IO_APIC disable? Or its extreme necessary?
Thanks,
Ricardo.
Well I'll probably tell you what just about everyone else here will.
If you use XP procs on a MP system you are on your own. If you
lucky they will work, if you aren't they won't. It appears that you
are not lucky.
Steve
Scorpion wrote:
>Hi follows,
>I'm getting in troubles with a A7M266-D motherboard with two
>Athlon XP 1800 cpus (yes, XP not MP!).
>Following the screen shot of my problem:
>^-------cut here---------^
>EIP: 0010:[<c0111686>] Not tainted
>EFLAGS: 00011046
><4>CPU: 1
><4>CPU: 1
>EIP: 0010:[<c0111686>] Not tainted
>EFLAGS: 00011046
> `u!wisuu`m aeesess 7eg111eg
> printing eip:
> printing eip:
>*pde = 11111010
>Stuck ??
>CPU #1 not responding - cannot use it.
>Error: only one processor found.
>ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs
>Setting 2 in the phys_id_present_map
>...changing IO-APIC physical APIC ID to 2 ... ok.
>init IO_APIC IRQs
> IO-APIC (apicid-pin) 2-10, 2-11, 2-12, 2-13, 2-16, 2-17, 2-20, 2-21, 2-22,
>2-23 not connected.
>..TIMER: vector=0x31 pin1=2 pin2=0
>^-----cut here-----^
>
>After spend some times put printk's in kernel source like "Reach this point!"
>I was trying disable IO_APIC in .config file but some link erros ocurred.
>Has any way to turn IO_APIC disable? Or its extreme necessary?
>
>Thanks,
>Ricardo.
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to [email protected]
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
>
>
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Scorpion wrote:
> I'm getting in troubles with a A7M266-D motherboard with two
> Athlon XP 1800 cpus (yes, XP not MP!).
Which kernel version ?
Zwane
--
function.linuxpower.ca
I tried using:
2.4.18-3smp (red hat 7.3) with options: hdc=ide-scsi
and using ext3 fs.
2.4.18-5custom (red hat 7.3 recompiled with smp, bigmem and ext3 fs) with
options: hdc=ide-scsi
2.4.18-5smp (red hat 7.3 upgrade of bigmem header problem and ext3 fs problem)
with options: hdc=ide-scsi
2.4.18-3 (red hat 7.3 uniprocessor for get up) with options:
hdc=ide-scsi noprobe mem=256m
details about the last:
When changing mem parameter value to 64 or 512 or 128 its stop in
different places (using the "printk debbug technic") in io_apic.c/apic.c
parts.
After that I tried the kernel from kernel.org and got the following message:
-----------^^^cut here^^^------------
Total of 2 processors activated (6121.06 BogoMIPS).
ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs
Setting 2 in the phys_id_present_map
...changing IO-APIC physical APIC ID to 2 ... ok.
...TIMER: vector=0x31 pin1=2 pin2=0
testing the IO APIC...........................................
......................................................................done.
Using local APIC timer interrupts.
calibrating APIC timer ...
..... CPU clock speed is 1533.2911 MHz.
..... host bus clock speed is 266.6593 MHz.
cpu: 0, clocks: 2666593, slice: 888864
CPU0<T0:2666592,T1:1777728,D:0,S:888864,C:2666593>
-----------^^^cut here^^^------------
Its a error? Should a try the last last kernel patchs?
I'm not thinking about a hadware problem, cause BIOS detect
2 CPUS and Linux agree with this. Am I wrong?
Regards,
Ricardo.
On Monday 29 July 2002 16:52, The Kernel Developer Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Scorpion wrote:
> > I'm getting in troubles with a A7M266-D motherboard with two
> > Athlon XP 1800 cpus (yes, XP not MP!).
>
> Which kernel version ?
>
> Zwane
Hi All,
I got my Dual Athlon XP1800 working now.
Everything gonna well after changed MP 1.4 Support to disable in BIOS, and
leaving MP table enabled.
Anyone knows if linux 2.4.19 has not yet a full implemantation of MP 1.4 or if
it is just a BIOSes bug?
Thanks in advance,
Scorpion.
On Monday 29 July 2002 16:52, The Kernel Developer Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Scorpion wrote:
> > I'm getting in troubles with a A7M266-D motherboard with two
> > Athlon XP 1800 cpus (yes, XP not MP!).
>
> Which kernel version ?
>
> Zwane
On Thu, 2002-09-05 at 18:53, Scorpion wrote:
> Hi All,
> I got my Dual Athlon XP1800 working now.
> Everything gonna well after changed MP 1.4 Support to disable in BIOS, and
> leaving MP table enabled.
> Anyone knows if linux 2.4.19 has not yet a full implemantation of MP 1.4 or if
> it is just a BIOSes bug?
On the 1004 BIOS with the ASUS it seems to be a bios table error. Later
BIOSes fixed it, then removed the option, then broke lots of other
stuff. I went back to 1004 so I dont know how the newest fare
Alan Cox <[email protected]> writes:
> On Thu, 2002-09-05 at 18:53, Scorpion wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > I got my Dual Athlon XP1800 working now.
> > Everything gonna well after changed MP 1.4 Support to disable in BIOS, and
> > leaving MP table enabled.
> > Anyone knows if linux 2.4.19 has not yet a full implemantation of MP 1.4 or if
> > it is just a BIOSes bug?
>
> On the 1004 BIOS with the ASUS it seems to be a bios table error. Later
> BIOSes fixed it, then removed the option, then broke lots of other
> stuff. I went back to 1004 so I dont know how the newest fare
I am using 1006. I have enabled MP 1.4 in order to get the IRQ
numbers 16 and beyond. I am not sure how useful that is since several
PCI IRQs are shared and there are lots of free ones. Anyhow, MP 1.1
works just fine too. I am using the Athlon MP 1900+ CPUs.
Note to anyone who is considering this cpu/motherboard, this combo
uses *shedloads* of power. 400W is *not* enough (I've seen Alan post
to this effect before but it bears repeating). Also, make sure you
have good case airflow -- all that power that is being consumed is
being turned into heat. Aftermarket CPU heatsink and fan are a good
idea. Unfortunately, it is a bit crowded for 80mm CPU fans though.
Things are stable now once I mitigated the heat death problem.
--
Johan KULLSTAM