2002-08-04 22:26:01

by DervishD

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Just cosmethic but...

Hi all :)

The output of 'cat /proc/meminfo' is ugly by today standards,
since is very frequent having more than 99 Mb of RAM and the current
meminfo just supports 8 digits before outputting ugly tabulations.

So, how about raising that 8 digits to at least 10, thus allowing
pretty tabulations up to 9 Gb of RAM?

If it will be accepted I can make the patch against the current
-ac kernel, for example. I know that is only a cosmethic change, but
I use meminfo a lot and I would like to see a good tabulation ;))

Ra?l


2002-08-04 23:19:16

by J.A. Magallon

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: Just cosmethic but...


On 20020805 DervishD wrote:
> Hi all :)
>
> The output of 'cat /proc/meminfo' is ugly by today standards,
> since is very frequent having more than 99 Mb of RAM and the current
> meminfo just supports 8 digits before outputting ugly tabulations.
>
> So, how about raising that 8 digits to at least 10, thus allowing
> pretty tabulations up to 9 Gb of RAM?
>

Why 10 ?
unsigned long k32= ~0;
unsigned long long k64 = ~0;
printf("%d %lu\n",sizeof(k32)*8,k32);
printf("%d %llu\n",sizeof(k64)*8,k64);

gives

32 4294967295
64 18446744073709551615

On a 64 bit box you could have 2^64 bytes.
Opps, and on a 32bit box you could have 16Gb of swap ?
1Tb is:
unsigned long long k64 = 1ULL<<40;
64 1099511627776

13 digits (nice number ;))

Sorry, late at night here...

--
J.A. Magallon \ Software is like sex:
junk.able.es \ It's better when it's free
Mandrake Linux release 9.0 (Cooker) for i586
Linux 2.4.19-jam0 (gcc 3.2 (Mandrake Linux 9.0 3.2-0.2mdk))

2002-08-05 09:24:47

by DervishD

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: Just cosmethic but...

Hi Magallon :)

>> So, how about raising that 8 digits to at least 10, thus allowing
>> pretty tabulations up to 9 Gb of RAM?
>Why 10 ?

Just for being conservative ;)) Truly, the whole format should be
changed, but...

>13 digits (nice number ;))

I think that 13 digits will fit well too ;))

Ra?l

2002-08-05 16:26:16

by Kasper Dupont

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: Just cosmethic but...

DervishD wrote:
>
> Truly, the whole format should be changed, but...

In that case try removing the first three lines, and
start fixing all userspace programs that breaks.

--
Kasper Dupont -- der bruger for meget tid p? usenet.
For sending spam use mailto:[email protected]
or mailto:[email protected]