Russell, Nathaniel wrote:
> My i ask what the sense is to not remove the dead code if
> all we are trying to do is stablize the 2.4x kernel series
> and not add extra code or change around the drivers for
> perticular hardware. The code is not used anymore so why
> keep it in the 2.4x series. The code can stay in the 2.5x
> series no problem because there we can change drivers
> rewrite hardware protocalls and tthings like that.
...because I maintain the driver, and want to keep that code around as a
note to myself.
Jeff
O K Then
Russell, Nathaniel wrote:
>My i ask what the sense is to not remove the dead code if
> all we are trying to do is stablize the 2.4x kernel
series
> and not add extra code or change around the drivers for
> perticular hardware. The code is not used anymore so why
> keep it in the 2.4x series. The code can stay in the 2.5x
> series no problem because there we can change drivers
> rewrite hardware protocalls and tthings like that.
...because I maintain the driver, and want to keep that
code around as a note to myself.
Jeff