2002-09-26 01:07:07

by Nivedita Singhvi

Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] NF-HIPAC: High Performance Packet Classification

Andi Kleen wrote:

> I guess he's thinking of the FIB, not the routing cache.

I was, + chain explansion, but this is just (um, cough)
to s/he/she

:)
thanks,
Nivedita

> The current FIBs have a bit heavier locking at least. Fine grain locking
> btrees is also not easy/nice.
>
> -Andi

2002-09-26 01:10:37

by Andi Kleen

Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] NF-HIPAC: High Performance Packet Classification

On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 06:17:58PM -0700, Nivedita Singhvi wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > I guess he's thinking of the FIB, not the routing cache.
>
> I was, + chain explansion, but this is just (um, cough)
> to s/he/she

I was actually thinking about the first poster in the thread (it was a 'he'
iirc)

But thanks for the correction anyways :-)

-Andi