2005-12-25 14:42:09

by Manfred Spraul

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] forcedeth: TSO fix for large buffers

This patch contains a bug fix for large buffers. Originally, if a tx
buffer to be sent was larger then the maximum size of the tx descriptor,

it would overwrite other control bits. In this patch, the buffer is
split over multiple descriptors. Also, the fragments are now setup in
forward order.

Signed-off-by: Ayaz Abdulla <[email protected]>

Rediffed against forcedeth 0.48
Signed-Off-By: Manfred Spraul <[email protected]>

--- 2.6/drivers/net/forcedeth.c 2005-12-24 14:22:04.000000000 +0100
+++ x64/drivers/net/forcedeth.c 2005-12-24 14:21:35.000000000 +0100
@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@
* 0.46: 20 Oct 2005: Add irq optimization modes.
* 0.47: 26 Oct 2005: Add phyaddr 0 in phy scan.
* 0.48: 24 Dec 2005: Disable TSO, bugfix for pci_map_single
+ * 0.49: 10 Dec 2005: Fix tso for large buffers.
*
* Known bugs:
* We suspect that on some hardware no TX done interrupts are generated.
@@ -112,7 +113,7 @@
* DEV_NEED_TIMERIRQ will not harm you on sane hardware, only generating a few
* superfluous timer interrupts from the nic.
*/
-#define FORCEDETH_VERSION "0.48"
+#define FORCEDETH_VERSION "0.49"
#define DRV_NAME "forcedeth"

#include <linux/module.h>
@@ -349,6 +350,8 @@
#define NV_TX2_VALID (1<<31)
#define NV_TX2_TSO (1<<28)
#define NV_TX2_TSO_SHIFT 14
+#define NV_TX2_TSO_MAX_SHIFT 14
+#define NV_TX2_TSO_MAX_SIZE (1<<NV_TX2_TSO_MAX_SHIFT)
#define NV_TX2_CHECKSUM_L3 (1<<27)
#define NV_TX2_CHECKSUM_L4 (1<<26)

@@ -408,15 +411,15 @@
#define NV_WATCHDOG_TIMEO (5*HZ)

#define RX_RING 128
-#define TX_RING 64
+#define TX_RING 256
/*
* If your nic mysteriously hangs then try to reduce the limits
* to 1/0: It might be required to set NV_TX_LASTPACKET in the
* last valid ring entry. But this would be impossible to
* implement - probably a disassembly error.
*/
-#define TX_LIMIT_STOP 63
-#define TX_LIMIT_START 62
+#define TX_LIMIT_STOP 255
+#define TX_LIMIT_START 254

/* rx/tx mac addr + type + vlan + align + slack*/
#define NV_RX_HEADERS (64)
@@ -535,6 +538,7 @@
unsigned int next_tx, nic_tx;
struct sk_buff *tx_skbuff[TX_RING];
dma_addr_t tx_dma[TX_RING];
+ unsigned int tx_dma_len[TX_RING];
u32 tx_flags;
};

@@ -935,6 +939,7 @@
else
np->tx_ring.ex[i].FlagLen = 0;
np->tx_skbuff[i] = NULL;
+ np->tx_dma[i] = 0;
}
}

@@ -945,30 +950,27 @@
return nv_alloc_rx(dev);
}

-static void nv_release_txskb(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int skbnr)
+static int nv_release_txskb(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int skbnr)
{
struct fe_priv *np = netdev_priv(dev);
- struct sk_buff *skb = np->tx_skbuff[skbnr];
- unsigned int j, entry, fragments;
-
- dprintk(KERN_INFO "%s: nv_release_txskb for skbnr %d, skb %p\n",
- dev->name, skbnr, np->tx_skbuff[skbnr]);
-
- entry = skbnr;
- if ((fragments = skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags) != 0) {
- for (j = fragments; j >= 1; j--) {
- skb_frag_t *frag = &skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[j-1];
- pci_unmap_page(np->pci_dev, np->tx_dma[entry],
- frag->size,
- PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
- entry = (entry - 1) % TX_RING;
- }
+
+ dprintk(KERN_INFO "%s: nv_release_txskb for skbnr %d\n",
+ dev->name, skbnr);
+
+ if (np->tx_dma[skbnr]) {
+ pci_unmap_page(np->pci_dev, np->tx_dma[skbnr],
+ np->tx_dma_len[skbnr],
+ PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
+ np->tx_dma[skbnr] = 0;
+ }
+
+ if (np->tx_skbuff[skbnr]) {
+ dev_kfree_skb_irq(np->tx_skbuff[skbnr]);
+ np->tx_skbuff[skbnr] = NULL;
+ return 1;
+ } else {
+ return 0;
}
- pci_unmap_single(np->pci_dev, np->tx_dma[entry],
- skb->len - skb->data_len,
- PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
- dev_kfree_skb_irq(skb);
- np->tx_skbuff[skbnr] = NULL;
}

static void nv_drain_tx(struct net_device *dev)
@@ -981,10 +983,8 @@
np->tx_ring.orig[i].FlagLen = 0;
else
np->tx_ring.ex[i].FlagLen = 0;
- if (np->tx_skbuff[i]) {
- nv_release_txskb(dev, i);
+ if (nv_release_txskb(dev, i))
np->stats.tx_dropped++;
- }
}
}

@@ -1021,68 +1021,105 @@
static int nv_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
{
struct fe_priv *np = netdev_priv(dev);
+ u32 tx_flags = 0;
u32 tx_flags_extra = (np->desc_ver == DESC_VER_1 ? NV_TX_LASTPACKET : NV_TX2_LASTPACKET);
unsigned int fragments = skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags;
- unsigned int nr = (np->next_tx + fragments) % TX_RING;
+ unsigned int nr = (np->next_tx - 1) % TX_RING;
+ unsigned int start_nr = np->next_tx % TX_RING;
unsigned int i;
+ u32 offset = 0;
+ u32 bcnt;
+ u32 size = skb->len-skb->data_len;
+ u32 entries = (size >> NV_TX2_TSO_MAX_SHIFT) + ((size & (NV_TX2_TSO_MAX_SIZE-1)) ? 1 : 0);
+
+ /* add fragments to entries count */
+ for (i = 0; i < fragments; i++) {
+ entries += (skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[i].size >> NV_TX2_TSO_MAX_SHIFT) +
+ ((skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[i].size & (NV_TX2_TSO_MAX_SIZE-1)) ? 1 : 0);
+ }

spin_lock_irq(&np->lock);

- if ((np->next_tx - np->nic_tx + fragments) > TX_LIMIT_STOP) {
+ if ((np->next_tx - np->nic_tx + entries - 1) > TX_LIMIT_STOP) {
spin_unlock_irq(&np->lock);
netif_stop_queue(dev);
return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
}

- np->tx_skbuff[nr] = skb;
-
- if (fragments) {
- dprintk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: nv_start_xmit: buffer contains %d fragments\n", dev->name, fragments);
- /* setup descriptors in reverse order */
- for (i = fragments; i >= 1; i--) {
- skb_frag_t *frag = &skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[i-1];
- np->tx_dma[nr] = pci_map_page(np->pci_dev, frag->page, frag->page_offset, frag->size,
- PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
+ /* setup the header buffer */
+ do {
+ bcnt = (size > NV_TX2_TSO_MAX_SIZE) ? NV_TX2_TSO_MAX_SIZE : size;
+ nr = (nr + 1) % TX_RING;
+
+ np->tx_dma[nr] = pci_map_single(np->pci_dev, skb->data + offset, bcnt,
+ PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
+ np->tx_dma_len[nr] = bcnt;
+
+ if (np->desc_ver == DESC_VER_1 || np->desc_ver == DESC_VER_2) {
+ np->tx_ring.orig[nr].PacketBuffer = cpu_to_le32(np->tx_dma[nr]);
+ np->tx_ring.orig[nr].FlagLen = cpu_to_le32((bcnt-1) | tx_flags);
+ } else {
+ np->tx_ring.ex[nr].PacketBufferHigh = cpu_to_le64(np->tx_dma[nr]) >> 32;
+ np->tx_ring.ex[nr].PacketBufferLow = cpu_to_le64(np->tx_dma[nr]) & 0x0FFFFFFFF;
+ np->tx_ring.ex[nr].FlagLen = cpu_to_le32((bcnt-1) | tx_flags);
+ }
+ tx_flags = np->tx_flags;
+ offset += bcnt;
+ size -= bcnt;
+ } while(size);
+
+ /* setup the fragments */
+ for (i = 0; i < fragments; i++) {
+ skb_frag_t *frag = &skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[i];
+ u32 size = frag->size;
+ offset = 0;
+
+ do {
+ bcnt = (size > NV_TX2_TSO_MAX_SIZE) ? NV_TX2_TSO_MAX_SIZE : size;
+ nr = (nr + 1) % TX_RING;
+
+ np->tx_dma[nr] = pci_map_page(np->pci_dev, frag->page, frag->page_offset+offset, bcnt,
+ PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
+ np->tx_dma_len[nr] = bcnt;

if (np->desc_ver == DESC_VER_1 || np->desc_ver == DESC_VER_2) {
np->tx_ring.orig[nr].PacketBuffer = cpu_to_le32(np->tx_dma[nr]);
- np->tx_ring.orig[nr].FlagLen = cpu_to_le32( (frag->size-1) | np->tx_flags | tx_flags_extra);
+ np->tx_ring.orig[nr].FlagLen = cpu_to_le32((bcnt-1) | tx_flags);
} else {
np->tx_ring.ex[nr].PacketBufferHigh = cpu_to_le64(np->tx_dma[nr]) >> 32;
np->tx_ring.ex[nr].PacketBufferLow = cpu_to_le64(np->tx_dma[nr]) & 0x0FFFFFFFF;
- np->tx_ring.ex[nr].FlagLen = cpu_to_le32( (frag->size-1) | np->tx_flags | tx_flags_extra);
+ np->tx_ring.ex[nr].FlagLen = cpu_to_le32((bcnt-1) | tx_flags);
}
-
- nr = (nr - 1) % TX_RING;
+ offset += bcnt;
+ size -= bcnt;
+ } while (size);
+ }

- if (np->desc_ver == DESC_VER_1)
- tx_flags_extra &= ~NV_TX_LASTPACKET;
- else
- tx_flags_extra &= ~NV_TX2_LASTPACKET;
- }
+ /* set last fragment flag */
+ if (np->desc_ver == DESC_VER_1 || np->desc_ver == DESC_VER_2) {
+ np->tx_ring.orig[nr].FlagLen |= cpu_to_le32(tx_flags_extra);
+ } else {
+ np->tx_ring.ex[nr].FlagLen |= cpu_to_le32(tx_flags_extra);
}

+ np->tx_skbuff[nr] = skb;
+
#ifdef NETIF_F_TSO
if (skb_shinfo(skb)->tso_size)
- tx_flags_extra |= NV_TX2_TSO | (skb_shinfo(skb)->tso_size << NV_TX2_TSO_SHIFT);
+ tx_flags_extra = NV_TX2_TSO | (skb_shinfo(skb)->tso_size << NV_TX2_TSO_SHIFT);
else
#endif
- tx_flags_extra |= (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_HW ? (NV_TX2_CHECKSUM_L3|NV_TX2_CHECKSUM_L4) : 0);
+ tx_flags_extra = (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_HW ? (NV_TX2_CHECKSUM_L3|NV_TX2_CHECKSUM_L4) : 0);

- np->tx_dma[nr] = pci_map_single(np->pci_dev, skb->data, skb->len-skb->data_len,
- PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
-
+ /* set tx flags */
if (np->desc_ver == DESC_VER_1 || np->desc_ver == DESC_VER_2) {
- np->tx_ring.orig[nr].PacketBuffer = cpu_to_le32(np->tx_dma[nr]);
- np->tx_ring.orig[nr].FlagLen = cpu_to_le32( (skb->len-skb->data_len-1) | np->tx_flags | tx_flags_extra);
+ np->tx_ring.orig[start_nr].FlagLen |= cpu_to_le32(tx_flags | tx_flags_extra);
} else {
- np->tx_ring.ex[nr].PacketBufferHigh = cpu_to_le64(np->tx_dma[nr]) >> 32;
- np->tx_ring.ex[nr].PacketBufferLow = cpu_to_le64(np->tx_dma[nr]) & 0x0FFFFFFFF;
- np->tx_ring.ex[nr].FlagLen = cpu_to_le32( (skb->len-skb->data_len-1) | np->tx_flags | tx_flags_extra);
+ np->tx_ring.ex[start_nr].FlagLen |= cpu_to_le32(tx_flags | tx_flags_extra);
}

- dprintk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: nv_start_xmit: packet packet %d queued for transmission. tx_flags_extra: %x\n",
- dev->name, np->next_tx, tx_flags_extra);
+ dprintk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: nv_start_xmit: packet %d (entries %d) queued for transmission. tx_flags_extra: %x\n",
+ dev->name, np->next_tx, entries, tx_flags_extra);
{
int j;
for (j=0; j<64; j++) {
@@ -1093,7 +1130,7 @@
dprintk("\n");
}

- np->next_tx += 1 + fragments;
+ np->next_tx += entries;

dev->trans_start = jiffies;
spin_unlock_irq(&np->lock);
@@ -1140,7 +1177,6 @@
np->stats.tx_packets++;
np->stats.tx_bytes += skb->len;
}
- nv_release_txskb(dev, i);
}
} else {
if (Flags & NV_TX2_LASTPACKET) {
@@ -1156,9 +1192,9 @@
np->stats.tx_packets++;
np->stats.tx_bytes += skb->len;
}
- nv_release_txskb(dev, i);
}
}
+ nv_release_txskb(dev, i);
np->nic_tx++;
}
if (np->next_tx - np->nic_tx < TX_LIMIT_START)
@@ -2456,7 +2492,7 @@
np->txrxctl_bits |= NVREG_TXRXCTL_RXCHECK;
dev->features |= NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_SG;
#ifdef NETIF_F_TSO
- /* disabled dev->features |= NETIF_F_TSO; */
+ dev->features |= NETIF_F_TSO;
#endif
}


2005-12-25 20:57:54

by David Miller

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: TSO fix for large buffers

From: Manfred Spraul <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 15:51:42 +0100

> This patch contains a bug fix for large buffers. Originally, if a tx
> buffer to be sent was larger then the maximum size of the tx descriptor,
>
> it would overwrite other control bits. In this patch, the buffer is
> split over multiple descriptors. Also, the fragments are now setup in
> forward order.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ayaz Abdulla <[email protected]>
>
> Rediffed against forcedeth 0.48
> Signed-Off-By: Manfred Spraul <[email protected]>

Are you sure it's ok to setup the tx descriptors in that order?

Usually, you need to set them up last to first so that the chip
doesn't see a half-filled-in set of TX descriptors. Ie. the
core question is if the chip can scan the TX descriptors looking
for valid ones all on it's own after processing existing TX
descriptors, or do you have to explicitly allow the chip look
at the newly added TX descriptor with a register write or similar?

2006-01-03 20:26:35

by Ayaz Abdulla

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: TSO fix for large buffers

If you look at the code, I do not set the NV_TX2_VALID bit (stored in
np->tx_flags) in the first tx descriptor until all other descriptors for
this transmit are setup. This ensures hardware will not look at it. Once
all fragments/descriptors are setup, I setup the control bits for the
first tx descriptor. This includes any TSO (or checksum) info and the
Valid bit. Hardware now knows that it is valid and can proceed.


David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Manfred Spraul <[email protected]>
> Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 15:51:42 +0100
>
> > This patch contains a bug fix for large buffers. Originally, if a tx
> > buffer to be sent was larger then the maximum size of the tx descriptor,
> >
> > it would overwrite other control bits. In this patch, the buffer is
> > split over multiple descriptors. Also, the fragments are now setup in
> > forward order.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ayaz Abdulla <[email protected]>
> >
> > Rediffed against forcedeth 0.48
> > Signed-Off-By: Manfred Spraul <[email protected]>
>
> Are you sure it's ok to setup the tx descriptors in that order?
>
> Usually, you need to set them up last to first so that the chip
> doesn't see a half-filled-in set of TX descriptors. Ie. the
> core question is if the chip can scan the TX descriptors looking
> for valid ones all on it's own after processing existing TX
> descriptors, or do you have to explicitly allow the chip look
> at the newly added TX descriptor with a register write or similar?
>

2006-01-03 20:35:22

by Manfred Spraul

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: TSO fix for large buffers

Ayaz Abdulla wrote:

> If you look at the code, I do not set the NV_TX2_VALID bit (stored in
> np->tx_flags) in the first tx descriptor

You are right: tx_flags starts as 0 and is only set to np->tx_flags
after the first tx descriptor was set up.
I overlooked that point, sorry.

Jeff: Could you add the patch to your tree?

--
Manfred

2006-01-04 06:56:12

by Andrew Morton

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: TSO fix for large buffers

Manfred Spraul <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This patch contains a bug fix for large buffers. Originally, if a tx
> buffer to be sent was larger then the maximum size of the tx descriptor,
>
> it would overwrite other control bits. In this patch, the buffer is
> split over multiple descriptors. Also, the fragments are now setup in
> forward order.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ayaz Abdulla <[email protected]>
>
> Rediffed against forcedeth 0.48
> Signed-Off-By: Manfred Spraul <[email protected]>

I've assumed that this patch if From: Ayaz. Please confirm.

If so, it should have had

From: Ayaz Abdulla <[email protected]>

at the top of the changlog, thanks.