Stephan--
I don't know if anyone mentioned it or not, but the block addresses in your
error messages appear suspiciously close to 2^29. I'm suspecting an
internal
overflow in a calculation somewhere...
--marco
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Marco C. Mason wrote:
> I don't know if anyone mentioned it or not, but the block addresses in your
> error messages appear suspiciously close to 2^29. I'm suspecting an
> internal
> overflow in a calculation somewhere...
615381536 blocks can this be over the limit ?
(-b 8192 gives me warning : 'Warning: blocksize 8192 not usable on most
systems.')