I've had no response to my earlier post (Subject: IDE driver: CBLID
revisited).
In comparing the driver to docs I have, I've noticed some things and
have more to say about the VIA support, but I'm not much for sending
e-mail to myself....
I posted to this list to begin with because I found nowhere else to take
the issue. It seems impossible to determine who's supposed to be
maintaining the IDE driver these days.
-- Jim Howard <[email protected]>
[email protected] wrote:
> I've had no response to my earlier post (Subject: IDE driver: CBLID
> revisited).
>
> In comparing the driver to docs I have, I've noticed some things and
> have more to say about the VIA support, but I'm not much for sending
> e-mail to myself....
I read it... saved it for later reply, even ;-)
(I'm the author of libata, a new ATA driver)
> I posted to this list to begin with because I found nowhere else to take
> the issue. It seems impossible to determine who's supposed to be
> maintaining the IDE driver these days.
Bart is: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[email protected]>
Though Vojtech Pavlik is typically considered maintainer of the Via IDE
driver.
Jeff
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
>
>> I've had no response to my earlier post (Subject: IDE driver:
>> CBLID revisited).
>>
>> In comparing the driver to docs I have, I've noticed some things
>> and have more to say about the VIA support, but I'm not much for
>> sending e-mail to myself....
>
> I read it... saved it for later reply, even ;-)
Yeah, it was a little long and rambling. It was difficult, in part
because I was/am still confused by the driver.
> (I'm the author of libata, a new ATA driver)
Is that "lib" as in "liberation"?
>> I posted to this list to begin with because I found nowhere else
>> to take the issue. It seems impossible to determine who's
>> supposed to be maintaining the IDE driver these days.
>
> Bart is: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[email protected]>
>
> Though Vojtech Pavlik is typically considered maintainer of the Via
> IDE driver.
Ah, many thanks.
-- Jim Howard <[email protected]>
On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 [email protected] wrote:
> I've had no response to my earlier post (Subject: IDE driver: CBLID
> revisited).
Don't expect any maintainer to reply every single mail.
> In comparing the driver to docs I have, I've noticed some things and
> have more to say about the VIA support, but I'm not much for sending
> e-mail to myself....
Vojtech Pavlik is maintaining VIA IDE driver.
(please cc: me)
> I posted to this list to begin with because I found nowhere else to take
> the issue. It seems impossible to determine who's supposed to be
> maintaining the IDE driver these days.
me 2.5 kernels.
Alan Cox 2.4 kernels. (please cc: me)
--
Bartlomiej
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> Don't expect any maintainer to reply every single mail.
Well, of course not. I think however the post gets into an issue I
would normally expect some maintainer to take an interest in, in some
form. Of course, I may not have written it in such a way as to make
that very easy, although I tried.
>>I posted to this list to begin with because I found nowhere else to take
>>the issue. It seems impossible to determine who's supposed to be
>>maintaining the IDE driver these days.
>
> me 2.5 kernels.
> Alan Cox 2.4 kernels. (please cc: me)
Thanks for the clarification.
I happen to be running 2.4.20, but from what I can see, nothing appears
to have changed that would affect this issue in 2.5.x.
In any case, it appears I'll have to rephrase and try again.... ;)
-- Jim Howard <jiho@c-zone>