On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 at 04:30:10 +0000, Weiny, Ira wrote:
> Until we can remove the spinlock the current proposed patch should be applied
> in the interim. Sorry for the noise before.
> Reviewed-By: Ira Weiny <[email protected]>
Hi,
is this patch expected to be applied ?
I don't think so.
The following patch has rendered this patch unnecessary:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7526811/
Kaike
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:linux-rdma-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Saurabh Sengar
> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 2:42 AM
> To: Weiny, Ira; Wan, Kaike
> Cc: Hefty, Sean; [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/sa: replace GFP_KERNEL with GFP_ATOMIC
>
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 at 04:30:10 +0000, Weiny, Ira wrote:
> > Until we can remove the spinlock the current proposed patch should be
> > applied in the interim. Sorry for the noise before.
>
> > Reviewed-By: Ira Weiny <[email protected]>
>
> Hi,
>
> is this patch expected to be applied ?
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the
> body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 at 10:47:52 +0000, Wan, Kaike wrote:
> I don't think so.
> The following patch has rendered this patch unnecessary:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7526811/
> Kaike
OK, could you please use "Reported-by" tag of my name in your patch
Regards,
Saurabh