2003-07-14 13:55:00

by Alberto Bertogli

Subject: [PATCH] IPVS' Kconfig LBLC and LBLCR configuration typo

Hi there!

The following patch fixes what looks like a typo in ipvs' Kconfig
(net/ipv4/ipvs/Kconfig).

Both the IP_VS_LBLC and IP_VS_LBLCR schedulings have the same tristate
line (well, not the same, IP_VS_LBLCR's has a 'g' missing at the end):

tristate "locality-based least-connection with replication scheduling"

But it looks like LBLC should be "locality-based least-connection
scheduling" and LBLCR "locality-based least-connection with replication
scheduling".


Thanks,
Alberto


--- Kconfig.orig 2003-07-14 10:32:06.000000000 -0300
+++ Kconfig 2003-07-14 10:32:57.000000000 -0300
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@
unsure, say N.

config IP_VS_LBLC
- tristate "locality-based least-connection with replication scheduling"
+ tristate "locality-based least-connection scheduling"
depends on IP_VS
---help---
The locality-based least-connection scheduling algorithm is for
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@
unsure, say N.

config IP_VS_LBLCR
- tristate "locality-based least-connection with replication schedulin"
+ tristate "locality-based least-connection with replication scheduling"
depends on IP_VS
---help---
The locality-based least-connection with replication scheduling

2003-07-14 20:03:36

by Roberto Nibali

Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPVS' Kconfig LBLC and LBLCR configuration typo

Hello,

> --- Kconfig.orig 2003-07-14 10:32:06.000000000 -0300
> +++ Kconfig 2003-07-14 10:32:57.000000000 -0300
> @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@
> unsure, say N.
>
> config IP_VS_LBLC
> - tristate "locality-based least-connection with replication scheduling"
> + tristate "locality-based least-connection scheduling"
> depends on IP_VS
> ---help---
> The locality-based least-connection scheduling algorithm is for
> @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@
> unsure, say N.
>
> config IP_VS_LBLCR
> - tristate "locality-based least-connection with replication schedulin"
> + tristate "locality-based least-connection with replication scheduling"
> depends on IP_VS
> ---help---
> The locality-based least-connection with replication scheduling

Obviously correct. Dave, if you haven't already, please apply to your
tree, thanks. We're working on the 2.4.x patch ;).

Best regards,
Roberto Nibali, ratz
--
echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb3135071790101768542287578439snlbxq'|dc