I'm trying out 2.6 on one of my test boxes with an IDE dvd drive. I'm using
ide-scsi (I prefer scdx as opposed to hdx). I noticed that any attempt to
mount a DVD movie (lord of the rings comes to mind) it mounts as UDF. My
laptop mounts this same dvd as iso9660.
I've also been unable to play DVDs on this machine, but I don't have the
same packages installed as I do on my laptop.
--
Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Try passing the -t iso9660 option to mount or (if that doesn't work) you
could go so far as to removing the UDF support from the kernel.
On Tuesday 19 August 2003 07:34 pm, Wakko Warner wrote:
> I'm trying out 2.6 on one of my test boxes with an IDE dvd drive. I'm
> using ide-scsi (I prefer scdx as opposed to hdx). I noticed that any
> attempt to mount a DVD movie (lord of the rings comes to mind) it mounts as
> UDF. My laptop mounts this same dvd as iso9660.
>
> I've also been unable to play DVDs on this machine, but I don't have the
> same packages installed as I do on my laptop.
- - --
Bryan D. Stine
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/Qrwl4Cdq/Vbot6MRAjH5AKCHEROGxWCPeBjAW4uj4ODjRj0R7wCfScad
MJ/UsJIH2oz7wCAXVNTGbE8=
=VV4C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Try passing the -t iso9660 option to mount or (if that doesn't work) you could
> go so far as to removing the UDF support from the kernel.
I had a brain fart. I was using -o instead of -t =(
I do have DVDs playing now on 2.6.0-test3. I used ide-cd instead of
ide-scsi. apparently the scsi layer didn't like it.
Buffer I/O error on device sr1, logical block 7651
Buffer I/O error on device sr1, logical block 7652
Buffer I/O error on device sr1, logical block 7653
end_request: I/O error, dev sr1, sector 660400
I would get tons of Buffer I/O errors and some end_requests like the above
> > I'm trying out 2.6 on one of my test boxes with an IDE dvd drive. I'm
> > using ide-scsi (I prefer scdx as opposed to hdx). I noticed that any
> > attempt to mount a DVD movie (lord of the rings comes to mind) it mounts as
> > UDF. My laptop mounts this same dvd as iso9660.
> >
> > I've also been unable to play DVDs on this machine, but I don't have the
> > same packages installed as I do on my laptop.
--
Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals
Wakko Warner wrote:
>>Try passing the -t iso9660 option to mount or (if that doesn't work) you could
>>go so far as to removing the UDF support from the kernel.
>>
>>
>
>I had a brain fart. I was using -o instead of -t =(
>
>I do have DVDs playing now on 2.6.0-test3. I used ide-cd instead of
>ide-scsi. apparently the scsi layer didn't like it.
>Buffer I/O error on device sr1, logical block 7651
>Buffer I/O error on device sr1, logical block 7652
>Buffer I/O error on device sr1, logical block 7653
>end_request: I/O error, dev sr1, sector 660400
>
>I would get tons of Buffer I/O errors and some end_requests like the above
>
>
I thought ide-scsi was broken?
--
Christian Axelsson
[email protected]
> >I do have DVDs playing now on 2.6.0-test3. I used ide-cd instead of
> >ide-scsi. apparently the scsi layer didn't like it.
> >Buffer I/O error on device sr1, logical block 7651
> >Buffer I/O error on device sr1, logical block 7652
> >Buffer I/O error on device sr1, logical block 7653
> >end_request: I/O error, dev sr1, sector 660400
> >
> >I would get tons of Buffer I/O errors and some end_requests like the above
> >
> I thought ide-scsi was broken?
I can't tell if this is in the ide-scsi driver or the scsi cdrom driver. I
still personally wish that the ide drivers were modules of scsi instead of
being a seperate block device. USB storage creates scsi adapters, ide-scsi
allows ATAPI access via scsi. Why not do this for ide in general (if that
starts a flame war, please don't contribute =)
--
Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals
In article <[email protected]>,
Bryan D. Stine <[email protected]> wrote:
| Try passing the -t iso9660 option to mount or (if that doesn't work) you
| could go so far as to removing the UDF support from the kernel.
|
| On Tuesday 19 August 2003 07:34 pm, Wakko Warner wrote:
| > I'm trying out 2.6 on one of my test boxes with an IDE dvd drive. I'm
| > using ide-scsi (I prefer scdx as opposed to hdx). I noticed that any
| > attempt to mount a DVD movie (lord of the rings comes to mind) it mounts as
| > UDF. My laptop mounts this same dvd as iso9660.
| >
| > I've also been unable to play DVDs on this machine, but I don't have the
| > same packages installed as I do on my laptop.
If iso9660 looks enough like UDF to confuse the f/s typing logic, would
the problem go away if the iso9660 were checked first? It seems iso9660
can be mistaken for UDF, is the converse true?
In any case it can be set explicitly.
--
bill davidsen <[email protected]>
CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.
In article <[email protected]>,
Wakko Warner <[email protected]> wrote:
| > >I do have DVDs playing now on 2.6.0-test3. I used ide-cd instead of
| > >ide-scsi. apparently the scsi layer didn't like it.
| > >Buffer I/O error on device sr1, logical block 7651
| > >Buffer I/O error on device sr1, logical block 7652
| > >Buffer I/O error on device sr1, logical block 7653
| > >end_request: I/O error, dev sr1, sector 660400
| > >
| > >I would get tons of Buffer I/O errors and some end_requests like the above
| > >
| > I thought ide-scsi was broken?
|
| I can't tell if this is in the ide-scsi driver or the scsi cdrom driver. I
| still personally wish that the ide drivers were modules of scsi instead of
| being a seperate block device. USB storage creates scsi adapters, ide-scsi
| allows ATAPI access via scsi. Why not do this for ide in general (if that
| starts a flame war, please don't contribute =)
Probably because IDE and ATAPI are not the same thing. There are devices
which electrically connect to the IDE bus which don't speak ATAPI.
--
bill davidsen <[email protected]>
CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.
On Mer, 2003-08-20 at 19:06, bill davidsen wrote:
> If iso9660 looks enough like UDF to confuse the f/s typing logic, would
> the problem go away if the iso9660 were checked first? It seems iso9660
> can be mistaken for UDF, is the converse true?
>
> In any case it can be set explicitly.
Disks can be mastered with both
On 21 Aug 2003, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Mer, 2003-08-20 at 19:06, bill davidsen wrote:
> > If iso9660 looks enough like UDF to confuse the f/s typing logic, would
> > the problem go away if the iso9660 were checked first? It seems iso9660
> > can be mistaken for UDF, is the converse true?
> >
> > In any case it can be set explicitly.
>
> Disks can be mastered with both
Good point, but I hope that if that is the case it would work as either,
and the UDF mount would have worked. Perhaps that also would have worked
with a bit of option support.
--
bill davidsen <[email protected]>
CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.