>One thing I will say. Your code would be a hell of a lot saner for
>merging if you mapped the ISA/Legacy IRQ's as 0-15 (to software) and the
>PCI ones to 16+ like everyone else does. That would kill a _lot_ of
>ifdefs and the IRQ0 corner case
Alan, do you mean the case implemented in the IA64 tree? I was terribly out
of time so I had to do something quick and dirty. The IRQ0 was not nearly as
bad as the rest of the legacy drivers asking for the "IRQ3" and "4" etc. I
haven't looked into other arch's implementations - who else has done it? Was
it ever case similar to ours in others?
Thanks,
--Natalie
On Thu, 2002-12-26 at 01:14, Protasevich, Natalie wrote:
> Alan, do you mean the case implemented in the IA64 tree? I was terribly out
x86. IA-64 isnt something I pay any attention too anyway