2023-07-27 05:01:42

by Tim Jiang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 1/2] Bluetooth: hci_qca: Add support for Qualcomm Bluetooth SoC QCA2066

Hi Johan:

  I will address your comments in v13 version.


regards

On 7/26/23 14:59, Johan Hovold wrote:
> Please fix up the subject of this patch, which should be different from
> patch 2/2 and instead summarise what *this* patch does.
>
> Note that keeping the same 2/2 subject on the cover letter is fine as
> 2/2 is the primary patch and sort of summarises the series.
>
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 01:22:44PM +0800, Tim Jiang wrote:
>> This patch make the print btsoc type expression more clearly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tim Jiang <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h | 1 +
>> drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h b/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h
>> index b884095bcd9d..529382f0abb1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h
>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h
>> @@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ enum qca_btsoc_type {
>> QCA_QCA6390,
>> QCA_WCN6750,
>> QCA_WCN6855,
>> + QCA_QCA2066,
> This belongs in the next patch.
>
> These are currently not sorted by probably should be to make it easier
> to look up and add new entries. This could be done in a third,
> preparatory, patch.
>
>> };
>>
>> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BT_QCA)
>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
>> index 9b785c947d96..453000df7aec 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
>> @@ -1748,6 +1748,7 @@ static int qca_setup(struct hci_uart *hu)
>> const char *firmware_name = qca_get_firmware_name(hu);
>> int ret;
>> struct qca_btsoc_version ver;
>> + const char *soc_name;
>>
>> ret = qca_check_speeds(hu);
>> if (ret)
>> @@ -1762,10 +1763,35 @@ static int qca_setup(struct hci_uart *hu)
>> */
>> set_bit(HCI_QUIRK_SIMULTANEOUS_DISCOVERY, &hdev->quirks);
>>
>> - bt_dev_info(hdev, "setting up %s",
>> - qca_is_wcn399x(soc_type) ? "wcn399x" :
>> - (soc_type == QCA_WCN6750) ? "wcn6750" :
>> - (soc_type == QCA_WCN6855) ? "wcn6855" : "ROME/QCA6390");
>> + switch (soc_type) {
>> + case QCA_AR3002:
>> + soc_name = "ar300x";
>> + break;
>> + case QCA_ROME:
>> + soc_name = "ROME";
>> + break;
>> + case QCA_WCN3990:
>> + case QCA_WCN3991:
>> + case QCA_WCN3998:
>> + soc_name = "wcn399x";
>> + break;
>> + case QCA_QCA2066:
>> + soc_name = "QCA2066";
>> + break;
> This also belongs in the next patch.
>
>> + case QCA_QCA6390:
>> + soc_name = "QCA6390";
>> + break;
>> + case QCA_WCN6750:
>> + soc_name = "wcn6750";
>> + break;
>> + case QCA_WCN6855:
>> + soc_name = "wcn6855";
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + soc_name = "unknown soc";
>> + break;
>> + }
> And you should probably sort the above as well.
>
>> + bt_dev_info(hdev, "setting up %s", soc_name);
>>
>> qca->memdump_state = QCA_MEMDUMP_IDLE;
> Johan