2020-10-26 19:16:34

by Krzysztof Kozlowski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RESEND PATCH v2] dt-bindings: net: correct interrupt flags in examples

GPIO_ACTIVE_x flags are not correct in the context of interrupt flags.
These are simple defines so they could be used in DTS but they will not
have the same meaning:
1. GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH = 0 = IRQ_TYPE_NONE
2. GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW = 1 = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING

Correct the interrupt flags, assuming the author of the code wanted same
logical behavior behind the name "ACTIVE_xxx", this is:
ACTIVE_LOW => IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW
ACTIVE_HIGH => IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <[email protected]> # for tcan4x5x.txt

---

Changes since v1:
1. Add acks
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/tcan4x5x.txt | 2 +-
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/nxp-nci.txt | 2 +-
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/pn544.txt | 2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/tcan4x5x.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/tcan4x5x.txt
index 3613c2c8f75d..0968b40aef1e 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/tcan4x5x.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/tcan4x5x.txt
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ tcan4x5x: tcan4x5x@0 {
spi-max-frequency = <10000000>;
bosch,mram-cfg = <0x0 0 0 32 0 0 1 1>;
interrupt-parent = <&gpio1>;
- interrupts = <14 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
+ interrupts = <14 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
device-state-gpios = <&gpio3 21 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
device-wake-gpios = <&gpio1 15 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
reset-gpios = <&gpio1 27 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/nxp-nci.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/nxp-nci.txt
index cfaf88998918..9e4dc510a40a 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/nxp-nci.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/nxp-nci.txt
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Example (for ARM-based BeagleBone with NPC100 NFC controller on I2C2):
clock-frequency = <100000>;

interrupt-parent = <&gpio1>;
- interrupts = <29 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+ interrupts = <29 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;

enable-gpios = <&gpio0 30 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
firmware-gpios = <&gpio0 31 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/pn544.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/pn544.txt
index 92f399ec22b8..2bd82562ce8e 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/pn544.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/pn544.txt
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Example (for ARM-based BeagleBone with PN544 on I2C2):
clock-frequency = <400000>;

interrupt-parent = <&gpio1>;
- interrupts = <17 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+ interrupts = <17 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;

enable-gpios = <&gpio3 21 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
firmware-gpios = <&gpio3 19 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
--
2.25.1


2020-11-27 09:15:26

by Marc Kleine-Budde

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] dt-bindings: net: correct interrupt flags in examples

On 10/26/20 4:36 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> GPIO_ACTIVE_x flags are not correct in the context of interrupt flags.
> These are simple defines so they could be used in DTS but they will not
> have the same meaning:
> 1. GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH = 0 = IRQ_TYPE_NONE
> 2. GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW = 1 = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING
>
> Correct the interrupt flags, assuming the author of the code wanted same
> logical behavior behind the name "ACTIVE_xxx", this is:
> ACTIVE_LOW => IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW
> ACTIVE_HIGH => IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <[email protected]> # for tcan4x5x.txt

Jakub, can you queue this patch for net/master?

Marc

--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |


Attachments:
signature.asc (499.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature

2020-11-27 16:30:04

by Jakub Kicinski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] dt-bindings: net: correct interrupt flags in examples

On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 10:13:01 +0100 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 10/26/20 4:36 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > GPIO_ACTIVE_x flags are not correct in the context of interrupt flags.
> > These are simple defines so they could be used in DTS but they will not
> > have the same meaning:
> > 1. GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH = 0 = IRQ_TYPE_NONE
> > 2. GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW = 1 = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING
> >
> > Correct the interrupt flags, assuming the author of the code wanted same
> > logical behavior behind the name "ACTIVE_xxx", this is:
> > ACTIVE_LOW => IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW
> > ACTIVE_HIGH => IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
> > Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <[email protected]> # for tcan4x5x.txt
>
> Jakub, can you queue this patch for net/master?

Sure! Are these correct?

Fixes: a1a8b4594f8d ("NFC: pn544: i2c: Add DTS Documentation")
Fixes: 6be88670fc59 ("NFC: nxp-nci_i2c: Add I2C support to NXP NCI driver")
Fixes: e3b329221567 ("dt-bindings: can: tcan4x5x: Update binding to use interrupt property")

2020-11-28 22:23:56

by Marc Kleine-Budde

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] dt-bindings: net: correct interrupt flags in examples

On 11/27/20 5:27 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 10:13:01 +0100 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> On 10/26/20 4:36 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> GPIO_ACTIVE_x flags are not correct in the context of interrupt flags.
>>> These are simple defines so they could be used in DTS but they will not
>>> have the same meaning:
>>> 1. GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH = 0 = IRQ_TYPE_NONE
>>> 2. GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW = 1 = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING
>>>
>>> Correct the interrupt flags, assuming the author of the code wanted same
>>> logical behavior behind the name "ACTIVE_xxx", this is:
>>> ACTIVE_LOW => IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW
>>> ACTIVE_HIGH => IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
>>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
>>> Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <[email protected]> # for tcan4x5x.txt
>>
>> Jakub, can you queue this patch for net/master?
>
> Sure! Are these correct?
>
> Fixes: a1a8b4594f8d ("NFC: pn544: i2c: Add DTS Documentation")
> Fixes: 6be88670fc59 ("NFC: nxp-nci_i2c: Add I2C support to NXP NCI driver")

ACK:
> Fixes: e3b329221567 ("dt-bindings: can: tcan4x5x: Update binding to use interrupt property")

Marc

--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |


Attachments:
signature.asc (499.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature

2020-11-28 22:53:25

by Jakub Kicinski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] dt-bindings: net: correct interrupt flags in examples

On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 20:35:55 +0100 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 11/27/20 5:27 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 10:13:01 +0100 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> >> On 10/26/20 4:36 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>> GPIO_ACTIVE_x flags are not correct in the context of interrupt flags.
> >>> These are simple defines so they could be used in DTS but they will not
> >>> have the same meaning:
> >>> 1. GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH = 0 = IRQ_TYPE_NONE
> >>> 2. GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW = 1 = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING
> >>>
> >>> Correct the interrupt flags, assuming the author of the code wanted same
> >>> logical behavior behind the name "ACTIVE_xxx", this is:
> >>> ACTIVE_LOW => IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW
> >>> ACTIVE_HIGH => IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
> >>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
> >>> Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <[email protected]> # for tcan4x5x.txt
> >>
> >> Jakub, can you queue this patch for net/master?
> >
> > Sure! Are these correct?
> >
> > Fixes: a1a8b4594f8d ("NFC: pn544: i2c: Add DTS Documentation")
> > Fixes: 6be88670fc59 ("NFC: nxp-nci_i2c: Add I2C support to NXP NCI driver")
>
> ACK:

Applied to net and queued for stable, thanks!