2004-03-10 20:51:05

by Brian King

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: Question on MODULE_VERSION macro

Looks like the MODULE_VERSION macro is now in the tree.
Greg, any status on the sysfs patch you mention below?

thanks,

Brian


Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 11:57:38AM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
>>In message <[email protected]> you write:
>>
>>>Rusty,
>>> Christoph mentioned that a MODULE_VERSION macro may be pending.
>>
>>Hey, thanks Christoph for the reminder. I stopped when we were
>>frozen.
>>
>>This still seems to apply. Do people think this is huge overkill, or
>>a work of obvious beauty and genius?
>
>
> Looks sane. I'm guessing that modinfo can show this?
>
>
>>Doesn't put things in sysfs, but Greg was working on that for module
>>parameters... Greg?
>
>
> Oh yeah, I'll dig out that patch later this week. An older version has
> been sitting in my bk tree forever, need to update it with the last
> changes you sent me.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>


--
Brian King
eServer Storage I/O
IBM Linux Technology Center


2004-03-10 21:13:43

by Greg KH

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: Question on MODULE_VERSION macro

On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 02:49:24PM -0600, Brian King wrote:
> Looks like the MODULE_VERSION macro is now in the tree.
> Greg, any status on the sysfs patch you mention below?

Already posted to lkml a week or so ago, and Rusty responded back with a
different patch. I'll get to his response hopefully by the end of the
week...

thanks,

greg k-h