2004-06-01 05:17:49

by Mikael Starvik

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: Delete cris architecture?

Hi!

The CRIS architecture is very much alive and locally we are running 2.6.6.
It is true that I haven't submitted any patches since 2.5.74 or
something like that. It is my intention to send in a patch asap,
hopefully this week.

I will submit 2.6 patches more often in the future. Later this year
we will also add support for a new CRIS subarchitecture.

/Mikael (CRIS maintainer)

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sam Ravnborg
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 8:42 PM
To: Bj?rn Wes?n
Cc: Dan Kegel; Mikael Starvik; [email protected]
Subject: Re: Delete cris architecture?


On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 06:14:02PM +0200, Bjorn Wesen wrote:
> The CRIS architecture is stable and supported by Axis Communications
> officially in 2.4, but the 2.6 port is work-in-progress, thus you could
> expect problems building it from the vanilla kernel source. It works
> in-house on 2.6, but perhaps all patches have not trickled out to the
> official kernel yet (although they should have I think, so it's good that
> you mention stuff like this).

When grepping the source and even doing cross architecture changes it is
nice to have a ratehr up-to-date version in the main stream kernel.

It would be nice if Axis could at least drop an update of the tree for
each kernel release (provided there are any changes).
This would allow all of us to get a better overview, and in some cases
we may even introduce new stuff / fix errors.

So please start to feed Andrew (or Linus) regularly with updates.

Sam


2004-06-01 05:55:30

by Dan Kegel

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: Delete cris architecture?

Mikael Starvik wrote:
> The CRIS architecture is very much alive and locally we are running 2.6.6.
> It is true that I haven't submitted any patches since 2.5.74 or
> something like that. It is my intention to send in a patch asap,
> hopefully this week.
>
> I will submit 2.6 patches more often in the future.

Excellent. That will be very helpful. It's good to keep the
kernel.org tree up to date!
- Dan

--
My technical stuff: http://kegel.com
My politics: see http://www.misleader.org for examples of why I'm for regime change