Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> [ This is an updated patch where the symbol is exported GPL only
> recognized the GPL origin in the code used. Thanks for those
> people who pointed this out. ]
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qsort);
I'm sorry, but I don't see the connection. Just because the code
is GPL, why should a caller be constrained to be GPL?
Is there something about the qsort API that makes a caller
intrinsically a derivative work?
=============================
Tim Bird
Architecture Group Co-Chair
CE Linux Forum
Senior Staff Engineer
Sony Electronics
E-mail: [email protected]
=============================
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 07:37:55PM -0700, Tim Bird wrote:
> I'm sorry, but I don't see the connection. Just because the code is
> GPL, why should a caller be constrained to be GPL?
Originally this wasnt he case, it was changed the request of the glibc
people which I'm fine with.
--cw