2024-01-19 08:27:22

by Maulik Shah (mkshah)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2] soc: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Enhance check for VREG in-flight request

Each RPMh VREG accelerator resource has 3 or 4 contiguous 4-byte aligned
addresses associated with it. These control voltage, enable state, mode,
and in legacy targets, voltage headroom. The current in-flight request
checking logic looks for exact address matches. Requests for different
addresses of the same RPMh resource as thus not detected as in-flight.

Enhance the in-flight request check for VREG requests by ignoring the
address offset. This ensures that only one request is allowed to be
in-flight for a given VREG resource. This is needed to avoid scenarios
where request commands are carried out by RPMh hardware out-of-order
leading to LDO regulator over-current protection triggering.

Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Elliot Berman <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v2:
- Use GENMASK() and FIELD_GET()
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
---
drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
index a021dc71807b..e480cde783fe 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
@@ -1,11 +1,13 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
/*
* Copyright (c) 2016-2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
+ * Copyright (c) 2023-2024, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
*/

#define pr_fmt(fmt) "%s " fmt, KBUILD_MODNAME

#include <linux/atomic.h>
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
#include <linux/cpu_pm.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
@@ -91,6 +93,15 @@ enum {
#define CMD_STATUS_ISSUED BIT(8)
#define CMD_STATUS_COMPL BIT(16)

+#define ACCL_TYPE(addr) FIELD_GET(GENMASK(19, 16), addr)
+#define VREG_ADDR(addr) FIELD_GET(GENMASK(19, 4), addr)
+
+enum {
+ HW_ACCL_CLK = 0x3,
+ HW_ACCL_VREG,
+ HW_ACCL_BUS,
+};
+
/*
* Here's a high level overview of how all the registers in RPMH work
* together:
@@ -557,7 +568,15 @@ static int check_for_req_inflight(struct rsc_drv *drv, struct tcs_group *tcs,
for_each_set_bit(j, &curr_enabled, MAX_CMDS_PER_TCS) {
addr = read_tcs_cmd(drv, drv->regs[RSC_DRV_CMD_ADDR], i, j);
for (k = 0; k < msg->num_cmds; k++) {
- if (addr == msg->cmds[k].addr)
+ /*
+ * Each RPMh VREG accelerator resource has 3 or 4 contiguous 4-byte
+ * aligned addresses associated with it. Ignore the offset to check
+ * for in-flight VREG requests.
+ */
+ if (ACCL_TYPE(msg->cmds[k].addr) == HW_ACCL_VREG &&
+ VREG_ADDR(msg->cmds[k].addr) == VREG_ADDR(addr))
+ return -EBUSY;
+ else if (addr == msg->cmds[k].addr)
return -EBUSY;
}
}

---
base-commit: 943b9f0ab2cfbaea148dd6ac279957eb08b96904
change-id: 20240117-rpmh-rsc-fixes-6c43c7051828

Best regards,
--
Maulik Shah <[email protected]>



2024-01-19 10:34:21

by Bryan O'Donoghue

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] soc: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Enhance check for VREG in-flight request

On 19/01/2024 08:26, Maulik Shah wrote:
> Each RPMh VREG accelerator resource has 3 or 4 contiguous 4-byte aligned
> addresses associated with it. These control voltage, enable state, mode,
> and in legacy targets, voltage headroom. The current in-flight request
> checking logic looks for exact address matches. Requests for different
> addresses of the same RPMh resource as thus not detected as in-flight.

This commit log implies you are fixing a bug.

Can you do some inspection of the git commit log and figure out where to
backport this change to ?

Your change would apply to 40482e4f73640d but a quick pass on the logic
in check_for_req_inflight() shows its probably _applicable_ to
658628e7ef78e8

> /*
> * Here's a high level overview of how all the registers in RPMH work
> * together:
> @@ -557,7 +568,15 @@ static int check_for_req_inflight(struct rsc_drv *drv, struct tcs_group *tcs,
> for_each_set_bit(j, &curr_enabled, MAX_CMDS_PER_TCS) {
> addr = read_tcs_cmd(drv, drv->regs[RSC_DRV_CMD_ADDR], i, j);
> for (k = 0; k < msg->num_cmds; k++) {
> - if (addr == msg->cmds[k].addr)
> + /*
> + * Each RPMh VREG accelerator resource has 3 or 4 contiguous 4-byte
> + * aligned addresses associated with it. Ignore the offset to check
> + * for in-flight VREG requests.
> + */
> + if (ACCL_TYPE(msg->cmds[k].addr) == HW_ACCL_VREG &&
> + VREG_ADDR(msg->cmds[k].addr) == VREG_ADDR(addr))
> + return -EBUSY;
> + else if (addr == msg->cmds[k].addr)

Consider removing the /* comment */ if it helps to apply the change
earlier than 658628e7ef78e8.

---
bod

2024-01-19 11:30:16

by Bryan O'Donoghue

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] soc: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Enhance check for VREG in-flight request

On 19/01/2024 10:34, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> Consider removing the /* comment */ if it helps to apply the change
> earlier than 658628e7ef78e8.
>
> ---
> bod
>

Earlier than 40482e4f73640d !

---
bod

2024-01-19 15:47:51

by Andrew Halaney

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] soc: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Enhance check for VREG in-flight request

On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 01:56:54PM +0530, Maulik Shah wrote:
> Each RPMh VREG accelerator resource has 3 or 4 contiguous 4-byte aligned
> addresses associated with it. These control voltage, enable state, mode,
> and in legacy targets, voltage headroom. The current in-flight request
> checking logic looks for exact address matches. Requests for different
> addresses of the same RPMh resource as thus not detected as in-flight.
>
> Enhance the in-flight request check for VREG requests by ignoring the
> address offset. This ensures that only one request is allowed to be
> in-flight for a given VREG resource. This is needed to avoid scenarios
> where request commands are carried out by RPMh hardware out-of-order
> leading to LDO regulator over-current protection triggering.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Elliot Berman <[email protected]>

Just noticed I commented on v1 when v2 was already out, sorry. Copy
pasting this just to keep it on the latest thread:

Two minor things:

1. Does this deserve a Fixes: tag?
2. The Signed-off-by chain here confuses me, you sent the patch
so your SOB should be last, but then that makes me believe Elliot
was the author which I don't think is reflected here (no From:
line). Please read [0] for a bit more details

[0] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#developer-s-certificate-of-origin-1-1

> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Use GENMASK() and FIELD_GET()
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
> ---
> drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
> index a021dc71807b..e480cde783fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
> @@ -1,11 +1,13 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> /*
> * Copyright (c) 2016-2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> + * Copyright (c) 2023-2024, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
> */
>
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) "%s " fmt, KBUILD_MODNAME
>
> #include <linux/atomic.h>
> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> #include <linux/cpu_pm.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> @@ -91,6 +93,15 @@ enum {
> #define CMD_STATUS_ISSUED BIT(8)
> #define CMD_STATUS_COMPL BIT(16)
>
> +#define ACCL_TYPE(addr) FIELD_GET(GENMASK(19, 16), addr)
> +#define VREG_ADDR(addr) FIELD_GET(GENMASK(19, 4), addr)
> +
> +enum {
> + HW_ACCL_CLK = 0x3,
> + HW_ACCL_VREG,
> + HW_ACCL_BUS,
> +};
> +
> /*
> * Here's a high level overview of how all the registers in RPMH work
> * together:
> @@ -557,7 +568,15 @@ static int check_for_req_inflight(struct rsc_drv *drv, struct tcs_group *tcs,
> for_each_set_bit(j, &curr_enabled, MAX_CMDS_PER_TCS) {
> addr = read_tcs_cmd(drv, drv->regs[RSC_DRV_CMD_ADDR], i, j);
> for (k = 0; k < msg->num_cmds; k++) {
> - if (addr == msg->cmds[k].addr)
> + /*
> + * Each RPMh VREG accelerator resource has 3 or 4 contiguous 4-byte
> + * aligned addresses associated with it. Ignore the offset to check
> + * for in-flight VREG requests.
> + */
> + if (ACCL_TYPE(msg->cmds[k].addr) == HW_ACCL_VREG &&
> + VREG_ADDR(msg->cmds[k].addr) == VREG_ADDR(addr))
> + return -EBUSY;
> + else if (addr == msg->cmds[k].addr)
> return -EBUSY;
> }
> }
>
> ---
> base-commit: 943b9f0ab2cfbaea148dd6ac279957eb08b96904
> change-id: 20240117-rpmh-rsc-fixes-6c43c7051828
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Maulik Shah <[email protected]>
>
>


2024-01-19 18:00:22

by Elliot Berman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] soc: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Enhance check for VREG in-flight request



On 1/19/2024 7:47 AM, Andrew Halaney wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 01:56:54PM +0530, Maulik Shah wrote:
>> Each RPMh VREG accelerator resource has 3 or 4 contiguous 4-byte aligned
>> addresses associated with it. These control voltage, enable state, mode,
>> and in legacy targets, voltage headroom. The current in-flight request
>> checking logic looks for exact address matches. Requests for different
>> addresses of the same RPMh resource as thus not detected as in-flight.
>>
>> Enhance the in-flight request check for VREG requests by ignoring the
>> address offset. This ensures that only one request is allowed to be
>> in-flight for a given VREG resource. This is needed to avoid scenarios
>> where request commands are carried out by RPMh hardware out-of-order
>> leading to LDO regulator over-current protection triggering.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Elliot Berman <[email protected]>
>
> Just noticed I commented on v1 when v2 was already out, sorry. Copy
> pasting this just to keep it on the latest thread:
>
> Two minor things:
>
> 1. Does this deserve a Fixes: tag?
> 2. The Signed-off-by chain here confuses me, you sent the patch
> so your SOB should be last, but then that makes me believe Elliot
> was the author which I don't think is reflected here (no From:
> line). Please read [0] for a bit more details
>
> [0] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#developer-s-certificate-of-origin-1-1
>

Maulik's S-o-B should be last. This change was authored by him
in our downstream driver and this change was pointed out as
also being a fix for the upstream driver. I helped rebase/apply
the change to upstream to test and shared patch back with him
for posting to the list.

When he got the rebased patch, my S-o-B would've been last, but
now need to be updated again so his is last.

>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Use GENMASK() and FIELD_GET()
>> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
>> ---
>> drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
>> index a021dc71807b..e480cde783fe 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
>> @@ -1,11 +1,13 @@
>> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> /*
>> * Copyright (c) 2016-2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
>> + * Copyright (c) 2023-2024, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
>> */
>>
>> #define pr_fmt(fmt) "%s " fmt, KBUILD_MODNAME
>>
>> #include <linux/atomic.h>
>> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
>> #include <linux/cpu_pm.h>
>> #include <linux/delay.h>
>> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> @@ -91,6 +93,15 @@ enum {
>> #define CMD_STATUS_ISSUED BIT(8)
>> #define CMD_STATUS_COMPL BIT(16)
>>
>> +#define ACCL_TYPE(addr) FIELD_GET(GENMASK(19, 16), addr)
>> +#define VREG_ADDR(addr) FIELD_GET(GENMASK(19, 4), addr)
>> +
>> +enum {
>> + HW_ACCL_CLK = 0x3,
>> + HW_ACCL_VREG,
>> + HW_ACCL_BUS,
>> +};
>> +
>> /*
>> * Here's a high level overview of how all the registers in RPMH work
>> * together:
>> @@ -557,7 +568,15 @@ static int check_for_req_inflight(struct rsc_drv *drv, struct tcs_group *tcs,
>> for_each_set_bit(j, &curr_enabled, MAX_CMDS_PER_TCS) {
>> addr = read_tcs_cmd(drv, drv->regs[RSC_DRV_CMD_ADDR], i, j);
>> for (k = 0; k < msg->num_cmds; k++) {
>> - if (addr == msg->cmds[k].addr)
>> + /*
>> + * Each RPMh VREG accelerator resource has 3 or 4 contiguous 4-byte
>> + * aligned addresses associated with it. Ignore the offset to check
>> + * for in-flight VREG requests.
>> + */
>> + if (ACCL_TYPE(msg->cmds[k].addr) == HW_ACCL_VREG &&
>> + VREG_ADDR(msg->cmds[k].addr) == VREG_ADDR(addr))
>> + return -EBUSY;
>> + else if (addr == msg->cmds[k].addr)
>> return -EBUSY;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> ---
>> base-commit: 943b9f0ab2cfbaea148dd6ac279957eb08b96904
>> change-id: 20240117-rpmh-rsc-fixes-6c43c7051828
>>
>> Best regards,
>> --
>> Maulik Shah <[email protected]>
>>
>>
>

2024-01-20 00:19:07

by Konrad Dybcio

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] soc: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Enhance check for VREG in-flight request



On 1/19/24 09:26, Maulik Shah wrote:
> Each RPMh VREG accelerator resource has 3 or 4 contiguous 4-byte aligned
> addresses associated with it. These control voltage, enable state, mode,
> and in legacy targets, voltage headroom. The current in-flight request
> checking logic looks for exact address matches. Requests for different
> addresses of the same RPMh resource as thus not detected as in-flight.
>
> Enhance the in-flight request check for VREG requests by ignoring the
> address offset. This ensures that only one request is allowed to be
> in-flight for a given VREG resource. This is needed to avoid scenarios
> where request commands are carried out by RPMh hardware out-of-order
> leading to LDO regulator over-current protection triggering.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Elliot Berman <[email protected]>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <[email protected]>

As others have pointed out, a fixes: would be in order.

If you're going to resend, please name the enum but no biggie

Konrad

2024-01-28 03:44:02

by Bjorn Andersson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] soc: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Enhance check for VREG in-flight request

On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 01:56:54PM +0530, Maulik Shah wrote:
> Each RPMh VREG accelerator resource has 3 or 4 contiguous 4-byte aligned
> addresses associated with it. These control voltage, enable state, mode,
> and in legacy targets, voltage headroom. The current in-flight request
> checking logic looks for exact address matches. Requests for different
> addresses of the same RPMh resource as thus not detected as in-flight.
>
> Enhance the in-flight request check for VREG requests by ignoring the
> address offset. This ensures that only one request is allowed to be
> in-flight for a given VREG resource. This is needed to avoid scenarios
> where request commands are carried out by RPMh hardware out-of-order
> leading to LDO regulator over-current protection triggering.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Elliot Berman <[email protected]>

The s-o-b chain doesn't look right.

> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Use GENMASK() and FIELD_GET()
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
> ---
> drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
> index a021dc71807b..e480cde783fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
> @@ -1,11 +1,13 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> /*
> * Copyright (c) 2016-2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> + * Copyright (c) 2023-2024, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
> */
>
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) "%s " fmt, KBUILD_MODNAME
>
> #include <linux/atomic.h>
> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> #include <linux/cpu_pm.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> @@ -91,6 +93,15 @@ enum {
> #define CMD_STATUS_ISSUED BIT(8)
> #define CMD_STATUS_COMPL BIT(16)
>
> +#define ACCL_TYPE(addr) FIELD_GET(GENMASK(19, 16), addr)

Command DB is there so we don't have to make assumptions about the
addresses of resources. As such, I dislike this define.

> +#define VREG_ADDR(addr) FIELD_GET(GENMASK(19, 4), addr)
> +
> +enum {
> + HW_ACCL_CLK = 0x3,
> + HW_ACCL_VREG,
> + HW_ACCL_BUS,

We already define these in the kernel, but with different names:
CMD_DB_HW_ARC, CMD_DB_HW_VRM, CMD_DB_HW_BCM. I see no reason to use
different names for the same thing.

> +};
> +
> /*
> * Here's a high level overview of how all the registers in RPMH work
> * together:
> @@ -557,7 +568,15 @@ static int check_for_req_inflight(struct rsc_drv *drv, struct tcs_group *tcs,
> for_each_set_bit(j, &curr_enabled, MAX_CMDS_PER_TCS) {
> addr = read_tcs_cmd(drv, drv->regs[RSC_DRV_CMD_ADDR], i, j);
> for (k = 0; k < msg->num_cmds; k++) {
> - if (addr == msg->cmds[k].addr)
> + /*
> + * Each RPMh VREG accelerator resource has 3 or 4 contiguous 4-byte
> + * aligned addresses associated with it. Ignore the offset to check
> + * for in-flight VREG requests.
> + */
> + if (ACCL_TYPE(msg->cmds[k].addr) == HW_ACCL_VREG &&
> + VREG_ADDR(msg->cmds[k].addr) == VREG_ADDR(addr))

I'm sure this work, at least for some targets, but I don't fancy
encoding this information here. It feels like a hack.

Furthermore, I really would like TP_printk() of trace_rpmh_send_msg() to
be able to resolve the symbolic names for VRMs as well, and it would
need the same information...

Please consider how we can query command db for the type and/or grouping
information.

Regards,
Bjorn

> + return -EBUSY;
> + else if (addr == msg->cmds[k].addr)
> return -EBUSY;
> }
> }
>
> ---
> base-commit: 943b9f0ab2cfbaea148dd6ac279957eb08b96904
> change-id: 20240117-rpmh-rsc-fixes-6c43c7051828
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Maulik Shah <[email protected]>
>

2024-01-29 06:21:36

by Maulik Shah (mkshah)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] soc: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Enhance check for VREG in-flight request

Hi,

On 1/28/2024 9:13 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 01:56:54PM +0530, Maulik Shah wrote:

>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Elliot Berman <[email protected]>
>
> The s-o-b chain doesn't look right.

I will fix in v3.

>
>> ---
>>
>> +#define ACCL_TYPE(addr) FIELD_GET(GENMASK(19, 16), addr)
>
> Command DB is there so we don't have to make assumptions about the
> addresses of resources. As such, I dislike this define.

sure i will consider querying command db for resource type.

>
>> +#define VREG_ADDR(addr) FIELD_GET(GENMASK(19, 4), addr)
>> +
>> +enum {
>> + HW_ACCL_CLK = 0x3,
>> + HW_ACCL_VREG,
>> + HW_ACCL_BUS,
>
> We already define these in the kernel, but with different names:
> CMD_DB_HW_ARC, CMD_DB_HW_VRM, CMD_DB_HW_BCM. I see no reason to use
> different names for the same thing.
>
>> +};

Right, I missed it, With querying cmd-db would not need this enum.

>> +
>> /*
>> * Here's a high level overview of how all the registers in RPMH work
>> * together:
>> @@ -557,7 +568,15 @@ static int check_for_req_inflight(struct rsc_drv *drv, struct tcs_group *tcs,
>> for_each_set_bit(j, &curr_enabled, MAX_CMDS_PER_TCS) {
>> addr = read_tcs_cmd(drv, drv->regs[RSC_DRV_CMD_ADDR], i, j);
>> for (k = 0; k < msg->num_cmds; k++) {
>> - if (addr == msg->cmds[k].addr)
>> + /*
>> + * Each RPMh VREG accelerator resource has 3 or 4 contiguous 4-byte
>> + * aligned addresses associated with it. Ignore the offset to check
>> + * for in-flight VREG requests.
>> + */
>> + if (ACCL_TYPE(msg->cmds[k].addr) == HW_ACCL_VREG &&
>> + VREG_ADDR(msg->cmds[k].addr) == VREG_ADDR(addr))
>
> I'm sure this work, at least for some targets, but I don't fancy
> encoding this information here. It feels like a hack.
>
> Furthermore, I really would like TP_printk() of trace_rpmh_send_msg() to
> be able to resolve the symbolic names for VRMs as well, and it would
> need the same information...

I can update in separate patch for trace_() to resolve symbolic names.

>
> Please consider how we can query command db for the type and/or grouping
> information.

Sure, i will update in v3 to query command db for the type.

Thanks,
Maulik

2024-01-29 06:28:17

by Maulik Shah (mkshah)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] soc: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Enhance check for VREG in-flight request

Hi,

On 1/19/2024 9:17 PM, Andrew Halaney wrote:

>> Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Elliot Berman <[email protected]>
>
> Just noticed I commented on v1 when v2 was already out, sorry. Copy
> pasting this just to keep it on the latest thread:
>
> Two minor things:
>
> 1. Does this deserve a Fixes: tag?
> 2. The Signed-off-by chain here confuses me, you sent the patch
> so your SOB should be last, but then that makes me believe Elliot
> was the author which I don't think is reflected here (no From:
> line). Please read [0] for a bit more details
>
> [0] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#developer-s-certificate-of-origin-1-1

Yes, this looks good to have patch, will include fixes: tag and will
fix SOB in v3.

Thanks,
Maulik