Hi!
I have mysterious Problem:
90 % of my Ram are used (340 MB), but 0 Byte of my Swap (2GB) is used
and about about 150 MB are swappable.
[matthias-christian@iceowl ~]$ free
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 383868 362176 21692 0 12 208956
-/+ buffers/cache: 153208 230660
Swap: 2097136 0 2097136
[matthias-christian@iceowl ~]$ cat /kernel-2.6.10-rc2-ott/config
[..]
CONFIG_SWAP=y
[..]
CONFIG_X86_BSWAP=y
[..]
[matthias-christian@iceowl ~]$ dmesg
[..]
Adding 2097136k swap on /dev/discs/disc0/part2. Priority:-1 extents:1
[..]
Matthias-Christian Ott
Quoting Matthias-Christian Ott <[email protected]>:
> Hi!
> I have mysterious Problem:
> 90 % of my Ram are used (340 MB), but 0 Byte of my Swap (2GB) is used
> and about about 150 MB are swappable.
>
> [matthias-christian@iceowl ~]$ free
> total used free shared buffers cached
> Mem: 383868 362176 21692 0 12 208956
> -/+ buffers/cache: 153208 230660
^^^^^^
You have ~230M of 380M free.
Nothing mysterious here.
> Swap: 2097136 0 2097136
>
> [matthias-christian@iceowl ~]$ cat /kernel-2.6.10-rc2-ott/config
> [..]
> CONFIG_SWAP=y
> [..]
> CONFIG_X86_BSWAP=y
> [..]
>
> [matthias-christian@iceowl ~]$ dmesg
> [..]
> Adding 2097136k swap on /dev/discs/disc0/part2. Priority:-1 extents:1
> [..]
>
> Matthias-Christian Ott
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
--
Regards Michael Buesch [ http://www.tuxsoft.de.vu ]
Michael Buesch wrote:
>Quoting Matthias-Christian Ott <[email protected]>:
>
>
>>Hi!
>>I have mysterious Problem:
>>90 % of my Ram are used (340 MB), but 0 Byte of my Swap (2GB) is used
>>and about about 150 MB are swappable.
>>
>>[matthias-christian@iceowl ~]$ free
>> total used free shared buffers cached
>>Mem: 383868 362176 21692 0 12 208956
>>-/+ buffers/cache: 153208 230660
>>
>>
> ^^^^^^
>You have ~230M of 380M free.
>Nothing mysterious here.
>
>
>
>>Swap: 2097136 0 2097136
>>
>>[matthias-christian@iceowl ~]$ cat /kernel-2.6.10-rc2-ott/config
>>[..]
>>CONFIG_SWAP=y
>>[..]
>>CONFIG_X86_BSWAP=y
>>[..]
>>
>>[matthias-christian@iceowl ~]$ dmesg
>>[..]
>>Adding 2097136k swap on /dev/discs/disc0/part2. Priority:-1 extents:1
>>[..]
>>
>>Matthias-Christian Ott
>>
>>
>>-
>>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>>the body of a message to [email protected]
>>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Ok maybe I wasn't able to read the /free/ output correctly, but why is
no swap used (more than 60% ram are used)?
Matthias-Christian Ott
On Mon Jan 31, 2005 at 13:44:04 +0100, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
>Michael Buesch wrote:
>
>>Quoting Matthias-Christian Ott <[email protected]>:
>>
>>
>>>Hi!
>>>I have mysterious Problem:
>>>90 % of my Ram are used (340 MB), but 0 Byte of my Swap (2GB) is used
>>>and about about 150 MB are swappable.
>>>
>>>[matthias-christian@iceowl ~]$ free
>>> total used free shared buffers cached
>>>Mem: 383868 362176 21692 0 12 208956
>>>-/+ buffers/cache: 153208 230660
>>>
>>>
>> ^^^^^^
>>You have ~230M of 380M free.
>>Nothing mysterious here.
>>
>>
>Ok maybe I wasn't able to read the /free/ output correctly, but why is
>no swap used (more than 60% ram are used)?
Why would you want to use swap when you still have free RAM? The kernel
isn't using swap because there is no need to.
Benno
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> Michael Buesch wrote:
> >Quoting Matthias-Christian Ott <[email protected]>:
> >>Hi!
> >>I have mysterious Problem:
> >>90 % of my Ram are used (340 MB), but 0 Byte of my Swap (2GB) is used
> >>and about about 150 MB are swappable.
> >>
> >>[matthias-christian@iceowl ~]$ free
> >> total used free shared buffers cached
> >>Mem: 383868 362176 21692 0 12 208956
> >>-/+ buffers/cache: 153208 230660
Note that ~200MB are being used for disk caching.
If your system need to allocate more ram, the disk cache will reduce before
swap is used.
Mark.
- --
Mark Watts
Senior Systems Engineer
QinetiQ Trusted Information Management
Trusted Solutions and Services group
GPG Public Key ID: 455420ED
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB/iVyBn4EFUVUIO0RAmRBAJ46Vk2Z69/i+bMrj1gbSF8obHgEkgCgw8iU
NgRDBYk+YoiRuWZZ2gFT8NE=
=R02H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Jan 31, 2005, at 07:44, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
> Ok maybe I wasn't able to read the /free/ output correctly, but why is
> no
> swap used (more than 60% ram are used)?
Swap is orders of magnitude slower than RAM. Why put things there if you
still have RAM left? The kernel only puts things in swap when it has no
more RAM _and_ has already deleted big chunks of its disk cache.
Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++: a18 C++++>$ UB/L/X/*++++(+)>$ P+++(++++)>$
L++++(+++) E W++(+) N+++(++) o? K? w--- O? M++ V? PS+() PE+(-) Y+
PGP+++ t+(+++) 5 X R? tv-(--) b++++(++) DI+ D+ G e->++++$ h!*()>++$ r
!y?(-)
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 22:50:35 +1100, Benno <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon Jan 31, 2005 at 13:44:04 +0100, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
> >Ok maybe I wasn't able to read the /free/ output correctly, but why is
> >no swap used (more than 60% ram are used)?
>
> Why would you want to use swap when you still have free RAM? The kernel
> isn't using swap because there is no need to.
2004 common VM thread: Why is my swap being used, I still have free RAM?
2005 common VM thread: Why is my swap not being used, I only have some free RAM?
Guess Linux is getting something right -- we can't please anyone!!!
-Rahul
Kyle Moffett wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2005, at 07:44, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
>
>> Ok maybe I wasn't able to read the /free/ output correctly, but why is no
>> swap used (more than 60% ram are used)?
>
>
> Swap is orders of magnitude slower than RAM. Why put things there if you
> still have RAM left? The kernel only puts things in swap when it has no
> more RAM _and_ has already deleted big chunks of its disk cache.
Unless he just booted, I would expect at least a little use of the swap,
something like this, on a machine with 1GB RAM and not much happening.
It's burning in with setiathome, and I played a few mp3s, and it seemed
to feel the need for swap. I see similar on a box with 4GB, it never
comes close to low memory, but still uses a few MB swap.
pixels:davidsen> free
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 1035228 996712 38516 0 175100 67932
-/+ buffers/cache: 553680 481548
Swap: 2048248 11292 2036956
pixels:davidsen> uname -rn
pixels.tmr.com 2.6.10-ac2
Not that this is a bad thing, but I'm surprised at no swap used at all.
--
-bill davidsen ([email protected])
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
last possible moment - but no longer" -me
Hi Bill :)
* Bill Davidsen <[email protected]> dixit:
> >Swap is orders of magnitude slower than RAM. Why put things there if you
> >still have RAM left? The kernel only puts things in swap when it has no
> >more RAM _and_ has already deleted big chunks of its disk cache.
> Unless he just booted, I would expect at least a little use of the swap,
> something like this, on a machine with 1GB RAM and not much happening.
I have 2.4.29 running and uptime is about 24 hours now, and with
1Gig of RAM and a loadavg in the last 15 minutes has been 4, more or
less, and I have 130 megs of free memory and none of my 512 megs swap
is used. And this is very common for me. The only way of using swap
is starting X, mozilla (some pre-firefox version will do) and one of
the many memory leaking apps available for the X Window System. On
console, with the apps I run usually (that includes setiathome too,
and heavy use of the C compiler) I don't hit swap. This is my memory
status right now:
total: used: free: shared: buffers: cached:
Mem: 927006720 796491776 130514944 0 5517312 738082816
Swap: 536862720 0 536862720
MemTotal: 905280 kB
MemFree: 127456 kB
MemShared: 0 kB
Buffers: 5388 kB
Cached: 720784 kB
SwapCached: 0 kB
Active: 7096 kB
Inactive: 719092 kB
HighTotal: 0 kB
HighFree: 0 kB
LowTotal: 905280 kB
LowFree: 127456 kB
SwapTotal: 524280 kB
SwapFree: 524280 kB
Pretty low usage, and still more than 700MB of cached memory
available to avoid using swap.
Ra?l N??ez de Arenas Coronado
--
Linux Registered User 88736
http://www.dervishd.net & http://www.pleyades.net/
It's my PC and I'll cry if I want to...