Sas address comparation is widely used in libsas. However they are all
opencoded and to avoid the line spill over 80 columns, are mostly split
into multi-lines. Introduce some helpers to prepare some refactor.
Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <[email protected]>
---
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_internal.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_internal.h b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_internal.h
index 8d0ad3abc7b5..171ffad514ca 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_internal.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_internal.h
@@ -111,6 +111,23 @@ static inline void sas_smp_host_handler(struct bsg_job *job,
}
#endif
+static inline bool sas_phy_match_dev_addr(struct domain_device *dev,
+ struct ex_phy *phy)
+{
+ return SAS_ADDR(dev->sas_addr) == SAS_ADDR(phy->attached_sas_addr);
+}
+
+static inline bool sas_phy_match_port_addr(struct asd_sas_port *port,
+ struct ex_phy *phy)
+{
+ return SAS_ADDR(port->sas_addr) == SAS_ADDR(phy->attached_sas_addr);
+}
+
+static inline bool sas_phy_addr_same(struct ex_phy *p1, struct ex_phy *p2)
+{
+ return SAS_ADDR(p1->attached_sas_addr) == SAS_ADDR(p2->attached_sas_addr);
+}
+
static inline void sas_fail_probe(struct domain_device *dev, const char *func, int err)
{
pr_warn("%s: for %s device %016llx returned %d\n",
--
2.31.1
On 2022/9/26 19:44, John Garry wrote:
> On 24/09/2022 08:34, Jason Yan wrote:
>> +static inline bool sas_phy_match_dev_addr(struct domain_device *dev,
>> + struct ex_phy *phy)
>> +{
>> + return SAS_ADDR(dev->sas_addr) == SAS_ADDR(phy->attached_sas_addr);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline bool sas_phy_match_port_addr(struct asd_sas_port *port,
>> + struct ex_phy *phy)
>> +{
>> + return SAS_ADDR(port->sas_addr) == SAS_ADDR(phy->attached_sas_addr);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline bool sas_phy_addr_same(struct ex_phy *p1, struct ex_phy
>> *p2)
>
> nit: please use "match" or "same" consistently in the naming. My
> preference was for "match" to be used.
>
OK.
Thanks,
Jason
> Thanks,
> John
>
>> +{
>> + return SAS_ADDR(p1->attached_sas_addr) ==
>> SAS_ADDR(p2->attached_sas_addr);
>> +}
>> +
>
> .
On 24/09/2022 08:34, Jason Yan wrote:
> +static inline bool sas_phy_match_dev_addr(struct domain_device *dev,
> + struct ex_phy *phy)
> +{
> + return SAS_ADDR(dev->sas_addr) == SAS_ADDR(phy->attached_sas_addr);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool sas_phy_match_port_addr(struct asd_sas_port *port,
> + struct ex_phy *phy)
> +{
> + return SAS_ADDR(port->sas_addr) == SAS_ADDR(phy->attached_sas_addr);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool sas_phy_addr_same(struct ex_phy *p1, struct ex_phy *p2)
nit: please use "match" or "same" consistently in the naming. My
preference was for "match" to be used.
Thanks,
John
> +{
> + return SAS_ADDR(p1->attached_sas_addr) == SAS_ADDR(p2->attached_sas_addr);
> +}
> +