At the this time we have no idea which patch is responsible, probably in
a day or two we'll have a patch to fix it.
Hans
Hans Reiser <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> At the this time we have no idea which patch is responsible, probably in
> a day or two we'll have a patch to fix it.
>
OK. I assume this performance change is demonstrable in just
2.6.14-rc2+reiser4? Beware that there are other changes in the -mm lineup
which might cause regressions. Notably
mm-try-to-allocate-higher-order-pages-in-rmqueue_bulk.patch
and
per-task-predictive-write-throttling-1.patch
per-task-predictive-write-throttling-1-tweaks.patch
Andrew Morton wrote:
>Hans Reiser <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>At the this time we have no idea which patch is responsible, probably in
>>a day or two we'll have a patch to fix it.
>>
>>
>>
>
>OK. I assume this performance change is demonstrable in just
>2.6.14-rc2+reiser4? Beware that there are other changes in the -mm lineup
>which might cause regressions. Notably
>
> mm-try-to-allocate-higher-order-pages-in-rmqueue_bulk.patch
>
>and
>
> per-task-predictive-write-throttling-1.patch
> per-task-predictive-write-throttling-1-tweaks.patch
>
>
>
>
>
I'll have vs check to make sure it is reiser4 changes causing the
drop. Thanks much for the suggestion we check that.